Skip to content

Local Anesthetics for Pain Reduction Prior to IV Line Placement

A Comparison of Lidocaine, Buffered Lidocaine, and Bacteriostatic Normal Saline for Local Anesthesia Prior to Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01759459
Enrollment
150
Registered
2013-01-03
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2022-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Local Anesthesia for Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the pain level felt by patients when receiving placement of a peripheral intravenous catheter (IV line) following the administration of a local anesthetic. The local anesthetics tested will be lidocaine, buffered lidocaine, and bacteriostatic normal saline. Lidocaine is commonly used as a premedication for reducing the pain upon insertion of peripheral IV lines. However, due to its acidic nature, the lidocaine itself may cause pain upon administration. To help counter this discomfort, pharmacies can buffer the lidocaine using sodium bicarbonate, which increases the pH to a neutral value, resulting in less pain. Bacteriostatic normal saline has also been used for local anesthesia with peripheral IV placement, particularly in patients with a lidocaine allergy, as it contains benzyl alcohol which acts as a local anesthetic. There are minimal reports from the literature that directly compare patient reported pain of all three agents to one another, although studies do exist that have compared buffered lidocaine versus lidocaine and buffered lidocaine versus bacteriostatic normal saline. To address this comparison gap, the following research questions need to be asked: which anesthetic agent is the superior premedication for reducing the amount of pain upon administration of the local anesthetic itself and for the pain associated with the peripheral insertion of the catheter? The hypothesis of the investigators is that there is not a significant difference in the degree of pain scales between the anesthetic agents to justify the pharmacoeconomic costs associated with compounding buffered lidocaine. The primary outcome measured in this study will be the level of pain reported by the patient upon administration of the local anesthetic and upon insertion of the peripheral intravenous catheter. A secondary outcome includes a pharmacoeconomic analysis that will look specifically at the cost-savings of using one agent over the other and will take into account the daily time allocated to pharmacy technicians and pharmacists for compounding and verifying buffered lidocaine.

Interventions

DRUGLidocaine

The medication will be administered immediately prior to receiving peripheral IV catheter placement

The medication will be administered immediately prior to receiving peripheral IV catheter placement

The medication will be administered immediately prior to receiving peripheral IV catheter placement

Sponsors

Allina Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Males or females \> 18 y.o. * Ability to speak, read, an/or understand English * Ability to communicate a level of pain via the specified pain scale * A written order exists for an intravenous peripheral catheter insertion for the patient

Exclusion criteria

* Lidocaine allergy * Buffered lidocaine allergy * Benzyl alcohol allergy * Non-English speaking * Non-responsive or unable to understand or report pain score (ex. intubated in the ICU) * Inability to place catheter

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Score Following Anesthetic AdministrationDay 1The primary outcome measured in this study will be the level of pain reported, on a scale of 0 to 10, 0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst pain ever felt, by the patient upon administration of the local anesthetic and upon insertion of the peripheral intravenous catheter.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Economic Analysis of Cost of Compounding Buffered Lidocaine Versus Cost of Purchasing Regular Lidocaine and/or Bacteriostatic Normal Saline3 monthsA secondary outcome includes a pharmacoeconomic analysis that will look specifically at the cost-savings of using one agent over the other and will take into account the daily time allocated to pharmacy technicians and pharmacists for compounding and verifying buffered lidocaine. The outcome data was measured and reported in a single value dollar amount per group, tallied over a 3 month period. The dollar amounts were estimated by adding up the costs of drug purchasing, technician compounding time, and pharmacist verifying time. Buffered lidocaine required both drug purchasing and compounding time, where the lidocaine and bacteriostatic normal saline required drug purchasing alone and labor costs were not taken into account.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Score Following Peripheral Catheter InsertionBaseline and day 1The primary outcome measured in this study will be the level of pain reported, on a scale of 0 to 10, 0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst pain ever felt, by the patient upon administration of the local anesthetic and upon insertion of the peripheral intravenous catheter.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lidocaine
1% Lidocaine for injection, 0.50 mL administered one time intradermally in peripheral forearm Lidocaine: The medication will be administered immediately prior to receiving peripheral IV catheter placement
50
Buffered Lidocaine
1% Buffered Lidocaine for injection, 0.50 mL administered one time intradermally in peripheral forearm Buffered lidocaine is compounded by the following process: 2.3 mLs of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate is added to a vial of 1% lidocaine Buffered Lidocaine: The medication will be administered immediately prior to receiving peripheral IV catheter placement
50
Bacteriostatic Normal Saline
Bacteriostatic Normal Saline for injection, 0.50 mL administered one time intradermally in peripheral forearm Bacteriostatic Normal Saline: The medication will be administered immediately prior to receiving peripheral IV catheter placement
50
Total150

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLidocaineBuffered LidocaineBacteriostatic Normal SalineTotal
Age, Continuous58.3 years56.6 years56 years57.5 years
Baseline pain scores0.09 units on a scale0.03 units on a scale0.15 units on a scale0.09 units on a scale
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants25 Participants29 Participants78 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants25 Participants21 Participants72 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 500 / 500 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 500 / 500 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 500 / 500 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Score Following Anesthetic Administration

The primary outcome measured in this study will be the level of pain reported, on a scale of 0 to 10, 0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst pain ever felt, by the patient upon administration of the local anesthetic and upon insertion of the peripheral intravenous catheter.

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LidocainePain Score Following Anesthetic Administration2.81 units on a scale
Buffered LidocainePain Score Following Anesthetic Administration1.64 units on a scale
Bacteriostatic Normal SalinePain Score Following Anesthetic Administration2.05 units on a scale
Secondary

Economic Analysis of Cost of Compounding Buffered Lidocaine Versus Cost of Purchasing Regular Lidocaine and/or Bacteriostatic Normal Saline

A secondary outcome includes a pharmacoeconomic analysis that will look specifically at the cost-savings of using one agent over the other and will take into account the daily time allocated to pharmacy technicians and pharmacists for compounding and verifying buffered lidocaine. The outcome data was measured and reported in a single value dollar amount per group, tallied over a 3 month period. The dollar amounts were estimated by adding up the costs of drug purchasing, technician compounding time, and pharmacist verifying time. Buffered lidocaine required both drug purchasing and compounding time, where the lidocaine and bacteriostatic normal saline required drug purchasing alone and labor costs were not taken into account.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: An analysis adding up the costs of drug purchasing, technician compounding time, and pharmacist verifying time, within a quarter of a year. Buffered lidocaine required both drug purchasing and compounding time, where the lidocaine and bacteriostatic normal saline required drug purchasing alone and labor costs were not taken into account.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LidocaineEconomic Analysis of Cost of Compounding Buffered Lidocaine Versus Cost of Purchasing Regular Lidocaine and/or Bacteriostatic Normal Saline13400 Dollars
Buffered LidocaineEconomic Analysis of Cost of Compounding Buffered Lidocaine Versus Cost of Purchasing Regular Lidocaine and/or Bacteriostatic Normal Saline9100 Dollars
Bacteriostatic Normal SalineEconomic Analysis of Cost of Compounding Buffered Lidocaine Versus Cost of Purchasing Regular Lidocaine and/or Bacteriostatic Normal Saline4840 Dollars
Other Pre-specified

Pain Score Following Peripheral Catheter Insertion

The primary outcome measured in this study will be the level of pain reported, on a scale of 0 to 10, 0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst pain ever felt, by the patient upon administration of the local anesthetic and upon insertion of the peripheral intravenous catheter.

Time frame: Baseline and day 1

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
LidocainePain Score Following Peripheral Catheter InsertionAverage pain score following medication injection2.58 units on a scale
LidocainePain Score Following Peripheral Catheter InsertionAverage pain score following IV inserti1.81 units on a scale
Buffered LidocainePain Score Following Peripheral Catheter InsertionAverage pain score following medication injection1.6 units on a scale
Buffered LidocainePain Score Following Peripheral Catheter InsertionAverage pain score following IV inserti1.81 units on a scale
Bacteriostatic Normal SalinePain Score Following Peripheral Catheter InsertionAverage pain score following medication injection2.10 units on a scale
Bacteriostatic Normal SalinePain Score Following Peripheral Catheter InsertionAverage pain score following IV inserti3.05 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026