Skip to content

Hemodynamic Responses During Induction: Comparison of Marsh and Schnider Pharmacokinetic Models

Hemodynamic Responses During Induction: Comparison of Marsh and Schnider Pharmacokinetic Models in Propofol Plasma Target-controlled Infusion

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01759160
Acronym
TCI
Enrollment
60
Registered
2013-01-03
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2013-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

Target control infusion, propofol, cardiac depression, induction of anesthesia, hemodynamics

Brief summary

To compare the hemodynamic changes during anesthesia induction between Marsh and Schnider plasma TCI models. We put forward a hypothesis that, if one TCI model is associated with much more prominent vasodilation effect or cardiac depression, a more sharp decrease in mean arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance , central venous return or stroke volume would be observed.

Detailed description

Current systems of propofol TCI are pre-programmed with the Marsh and Schnider pharmacokinetic models. Rate constants of Marsh are fixed, whereas compartment volumes and clearances are weight proportional. Schnider model has fixed values for VC, V3, k13, and k31, adjusts V2, k12, and k21 for age, and adjusts k10 according to total weight, lean body mass (LBM), and height. One major benefit of the Schnider model is that it adjusts doses and infusion rates according to patient age. This provides a strong argument for using the Schnider model in the elderly and unwell patients which may improve hemodynamic stability and safety. However for the vast majority of young and middle age patients, whether Marsh or Schnider would be a better choice for hemodynamic stability remains unknown. With marsh model, as VC is scaled to body weight, the amount of drug delivered is dependent of body weight. In the Schnider model, as VC at 4.27L is independent of body weight, VC in terms of ml/kg decreases as body weight increases. This and the influence of height and weight on clearance results in heavier patients receiving less propofol on a mg/kg basis whereas those with a lower lean body mass will initially receive about 30% less than delivered by Marsh, but after 30 min, the Schnider model delivers about 15% more. Besides, when Schnider model is used in the morbidly obese, the LBM equation can generate paradoxical values resulting in excessive increases in maintenance infusion rates. Nevertheless, the purpose of this study was to investigate the vast majority of Asian patients whose body weight were in normal range. Only patients with BMI between 18 and 29 were included to minimize the influential factor of body weight in TCI system. To compare the hemodynamic changes during anesthesia induction between Marsh and Schnider plasma TCI models. We put forward a hypothesis that, if one TCI model is associated with much more prominent vasodilation effect or cardiac depression, a more sharp decrease in mean arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance , central venous return or stroke volume would be observed.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMarsh Plasma TCI with high initial target

plasma target-controlled infusion in Marsh model(n=30) with an initial target concentration of 4 μg/ml. Target was then reset and gradually titrated to a sedation level with narcotrend index below 64.

PROCEDURESchnider Plasma TCI with high initial target

plasma target-controlled infusion in Schnider model(n=30) with an initial target concentration of 4 μg/ml. Target was then reset and gradually titrated to a sedation level with narcotrend index below 64.

Sponsors

First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients between the ages of 18 years and 70 years * ASA physical status I and II * surgical procedures requiring general anesthesia with continuous CVP and arterial pressure monitoring.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients younger than 16 y or older than 65 y * Body Mass Index (BMI) \<18 or \>30 * emergency surgery * allergy to any of the drugs used * inability to communicate effectively * severe cardiovascular dysfunction * patient refusal and patients on long-term opioids or sedative medication.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SVI (Stroke Volume Index) Value Change From Baseline Level at the End of the First 25 Minutes.The end of the first 25 minutes after propofol infusionAfter propofol infusion started, according to sedation level, TCI targets were gradually titrated to reach a state of equilibrium at the end of the first 25 minutes. SVI were continuously monitored, at the end of the first 25 minutes, value change from baseline level were calculated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NI (Narcotrend Index) Reduction25 minutes after propofol infusionNarcotrend was utilized to continuously record patients' sedation level during induction, provided as a criteria for Cpt (Plasma Target Concentration) adjustment.
CVP (Central Venous Pressure)25 minutes after inductionCVP was continuously monitored to assess preload condition and served to calculate SVRI (systemic vascular resistance index) every minute during the first 25 minutes of infusion.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The recruitment process started from Dec. 2012, ended in Jan.2013. Study location is The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University.

Pre-assignment details

enrolled participants were excluded when they were found allergic to drugs used during the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Marsh
Plasma TCI in Marsh Model with an initial target of 4 μg/ml, gradually titrated according to sedation level.
30
Schnider
Plasma TCI in Schnider Model with an initial target of 4 μg/ml, gradually titrated according to sedation level.
30
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSchniderMarshTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants30 Participants60 Participants
Age Continuous41.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
40.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
40.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
Region of Enrollment
China
30 participants30 participants60 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants15 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants15 Participants30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

SVI (Stroke Volume Index) Value Change From Baseline Level at the End of the First 25 Minutes.

After propofol infusion started, according to sedation level, TCI targets were gradually titrated to reach a state of equilibrium at the end of the first 25 minutes. SVI were continuously monitored, at the end of the first 25 minutes, value change from baseline level were calculated.

Time frame: The end of the first 25 minutes after propofol infusion

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MarshSVI (Stroke Volume Index) Value Change From Baseline Level at the End of the First 25 Minutes.-31.1 ml/beat/m^2Standard Deviation 9.8
SchniderSVI (Stroke Volume Index) Value Change From Baseline Level at the End of the First 25 Minutes.-31.7 ml/beat/m^2Standard Deviation 9.9
Secondary

CVP (Central Venous Pressure)

CVP was continuously monitored to assess preload condition and served to calculate SVRI (systemic vascular resistance index) every minute during the first 25 minutes of infusion.

Time frame: 25 minutes after induction

Secondary

NI (Narcotrend Index) Reduction

Narcotrend was utilized to continuously record patients' sedation level during induction, provided as a criteria for Cpt (Plasma Target Concentration) adjustment.

Time frame: 25 minutes after propofol infusion

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026