Skip to content

Comparison of Small-gauge Vitrectomy and Conventional Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Comparison of Small-gauge and Conventional Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01758757
Enrollment
347
Registered
2013-01-01
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2013-01-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Keywords

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy, Vitrectomy

Brief summary

Surgical outcome of vitreous surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) with conventional 20, 23, and 25-gauge vitrectomy were compared.

Detailed description

The 424 eyes of 347 patients of PDR who underwent vitreous surgery for persistent vitreous hemorrhage or progressive proliferative membrane were evaluated.

Interventions

PROCEDUREVitrectomy

Sponsors

Kyorin University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patients of proliferative diabetic retinopathy who underwent vitreous surgery and followed at least 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* The patients of proliferative diabetic retinopathy who underwent vitreous surgery but did not follow more than 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of retinal breaksOne year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of neovascular glaucomaOne Year

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026