Skip to content

The Role of Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients With Refractory Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01758627
Enrollment
7
Registered
2013-01-01
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2015-10-08
Last updated
2019-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease, Refractory Heart Failure

Keywords

Peritoneal dialysis,, chronic kidney disease,, refractory heart failure

Brief summary

In patients with advanced heart failure (HF), systemic congestion is the main indication for hospitalization. Recent evidence has highlighted the role of fluid retention in the pathogenesis of renal dysfunction and subsequent diuretic resistance. Previous kidney disease, diuretic resistance, and progression of renal dysfunction often coexist in patients with HF and persistent volume overload. This clinical presentation represents the most extreme feature of the cardio-renal syndrome. However, available therapeutic options for this ominous condition are scarce and limited. Indeed, there are no data from randomized control trials using pharmacological interventions that support the beneficial effect on survival. Interestingly, intermittent ultrafiltration has recently emerged as an alternative therapeutic option for reducing volume overload in patients with refractory HF. Current literature suggests that it has potential advantages over standard medical treatment particularly in acute stages of HF. Among ultrafiltration methods, peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been preferred as an additional resource for the treatment of advanced congestive heart failure (CHF) compared with hemodialysis because it can provide a more physiological and continuous ultrafiltration. In fact, several studies showed that use of PD improved clinical functional class and hemodynamic parameters and reduced hospitalization rates in patients with CHF. Nevertheless, most studies were limited by retrospective analyses of small sample size, prospective observational design with no control group, or inclusion of patients with end-stage renal failure. Therefore, well-designed prospective randomized controlled studies are mandatory to confirm the effects of PD in these patients.

Interventions

DRUGPeritoneal dialysis (PD)

PD exchanges will be customized depending on patient fluid status. At least one daily exchange of icodextrin PD solution will be provided to PD group.

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. At least two non-planned admissions for acute heart failure (AHF), the last episode being in the past 6 months 2. New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III/IV and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40% 3. Persistent congestion despite optimal loop diuretic therapy 4. Presence of renal dysfunction \[estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2\] documented at least once in the last 6 months

Exclusion criteria

1. \< 20 years of age 2. Pregnancy 3. Unsuitable for PD (patients with major abdominal wall defects) 4. Allergic to starch or other contraindication to icodextrin (5) End-stage renal disease (eGFR \< 10 ml/min/1.73 m2) requring dialysis treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Changes of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classat 0 (±1 week), 12 (±1 week), and 24 (±1 week) weeks)

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026