Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy including joint damage progression and safety of Abatacept plus Methotrexate (MTX) to placebo plus MTX.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* MTX inadequate responder * Biologic Naïve * Functional class I, II or III * ≥6 swollen and ≥6 tender joints * C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥2.0mg/dl or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥28 mm/hr * Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody positive * Have erosion
Exclusion criteria
* Any other rheumatic disease * Active angiitis on main organs excluding rheumatoid nodule
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% response rate | 4 months (week 16) |
| Change from baseline in Total Sharp Score (TSS) using the Modified van der Heijde Sharp (vdH-S) method to 6 months (Week 24) | Baseline (Day 1), 6 months (Week 24) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28)-CRP to 4 months (Week16) | Baseline (Day 1), 4 months (Week 16) | — |
| Non-progressors rate for the structural damage | Baseline (Day 1), 6 months (Week 24) | The non-progressors rate is defined as the proportion of subjects meeting the change from baseline in the TSS at 6 months less than or equal to the smallest detectable difference (SDD) and/or the smallest detectable change (SDC) |
| ACR 50 response rates | 4 months (Week16) | — |
| ACR 70 response rates | 4 months (Week16) | — |
| Safety and tolerability will be measured based on clinical Adverse Events, vital signs, and laboratory abnormalities | 12 months (Week52) | — |
Countries
Japan