Skip to content

Unimalleolar Versus Bimalleolar Fixation in Bi- or Trimalleolar Ankle Fracture

Unimalleolar Versus Bimalleolar Fixation in Bi- or Trimalleolar Ankle Fracture - A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Suspended
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01757951
Enrollment
126
Registered
2012-12-31
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2022-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Trauma

Keywords

Ankle, Fracture, medial malleolus, Osteosynthesis

Brief summary

A one third of all ankle fractures are bi- or trimalleolar. Traditionally these fractures are treated by both medial and lateral osteosynthesis, sometimes accompanied by osteosynthesis of the posterior malleolus. There is significant evidence that fractures of the lateral malleolus can be treated conservatively if the medial side is stable. However, there isn't a single study comparing standard bi- or trimalleolar fixation with only medial side osteosynthesis and postoperative immobilization with a cast.

Interventions

PROCEDUREUnimalleolar fixation

Medial malleolus is fixed first and after that ankle mortise stability is assessed using external-rotation stress test. If talocrural joint is stable after fixation of medial malleolus, the patient is randomized to unimalleolar fixation group and no fixation of the lateral side is performed.

PROCEDUREBimalleolar fixation

Medial malleolus is fixed first and after that ankle mortise stability is assessed using external-rotation stress test. If talocrural joint is stable after fixation of medial malleolus, the patient is randomized to bimalleolar fixation group i.e. additional fixation of the lateral malleolus fracture is performed.

Sponsors

University of Oulu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Weber B bi- or trimalleolar ankle fracture (fracture of the lateral and medial malleolus +/- posterior malleolus sized under 30% of the distal tibia joint line measured from the lateral projection of the standard ankle radiographs) * Age: 16 years or older * Voluntary * Operated within 7 days of the trauma * Able to walk unaided before the current trauma

Exclusion criteria

* Peripheral neuropathy * Pilon fracture * Bilateral ankle fracture * Concomitant tibial fracture * Pathological fracture * Active infection around the ankle * A previous ankle fracture on either side * In trimalleolar fractures, posterior malleolus fracture sized over 30% of the distal tibia joint line measured from the lateral projection of the standard ankle radiographs * Inadequate co-operation * Permanent residence outside the catchment area of the study hospital

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Olerud-Molander Ankle Score2 yearsA validated, condition-specific, patient-reported measure of ankle fracture symptoms. Range from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating better function

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
A 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale for function and pain (VAS)2 yearsRange from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe pain
The RAND 36-Item Health Survey for health-related quality-of-life (RAND-36)2 years8 subscales from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life
The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)2 yearsFAOS, 5 subscales from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better function
Fracture healing2 yearsFracture union is considered complete when the fracture line disappeared and conversely, those fractures with a visible fracture line are deemed non-unions.
Talocrural joint congruenceAt two, four and 12 weeks, and at 2 yearsMedial clear space \< 4 mm and ≤ 1 mm wider than the superior clear space as measured between the lateral border of the medial malleolus and the medial border of the talus at the level of the talar dome.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complications and HarmsAt two, four and 12 weeks, and at 2 yearsTreatment related complications and harms (i.e. wound infection, re-operations, deep vein trombhosis, plaster sore, wound healing problems)

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026