Skip to content

Study Comparing Ticagrelor With Aspirin for Prevention of Vascular Events in Patients Undergoing CABG

A Randomized, Parallel Group, Double-Blind Study of Ticagrelor Compared With Aspirin for Prevention of Vascular Events in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Operation TiCAB- Ticagrelor in CABG

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01755520
Acronym
TiCAB
Enrollment
1893
Registered
2012-12-24
Start date
2013-04-24
Completion date
2018-05-19
Last updated
2018-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome, Coronary Artery Disease, Stable Angina

Keywords

CABG, CAD, antiplatelet drug, Ticagrelor, Aspirin

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study ist to test the hypothesis that ticagrelor is superior to Aspirin (ASA) fort he prevention of major cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients undergoing artery bypass operation. The primary efficiacy MACCE-endpoint is the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, recurent revascularisation, and stroke at twelve month after coronary artery bypass operation.

Detailed description

For stable patients who underwent coronary bypass operation, Aspirin alone currently represents the gold standard of antiplatelet treatment. The CABG substudy of the PLATO-trial (http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0904327) comprising more than 1200 patients has convincingly shown a high significant reduction of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality for patients recieving Aspirin and Ticagrelor as compared to those subjects randomized to Aspirin plus Clopidogrel. Moreover the results of the PLATO CABG substudy showed that benefits of Ticagrelor increase with decreasing Aspirin doses. Therefore Ticagrelor monotherapy (2x 90mg/day) appears to offer the best balance of safety with anticipated improved efficacy over Aspirin (1x 100mg/day) alone, but until now there are no further data available to support this hypothesis. Hence this study (TiCAB) is assigned as a pivotal efficacy and safety study of Ticagrelor in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass operation and to test the hypothesis that ticagrelor is superior to Aspirin for the prevention of major cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in this patient population. The TiCAB trial is designed as a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, phase III, multicenter study, comparing the efficacy and safety of Ticagrelor 90mg administered twice daily with Aspirin 100mg once daily, for the prevention of MACCE within the first year after CABG operation.

Interventions

DRUGTicagrelor

90mg twice daily dose

DRUGAspirin

Aspirin 100mg once daily

DRUGPlacebo - Ticagrelor

Placebo

DRUGPlacebo - Aspirin

Placebo

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients 18 years of age or older 2. Informed, written consent by the patient 3. Indication for CABG surgery: * coronary three vessel disease, or * left main stenosis, or * two vessel disease with impaired left ventricular function (\<50%)

Exclusion criteria

1. Cardiogenic shock, haemodynamic instability 2. Indication for oral anticoagulation or dual antiplatelet therapy that can not be stopped after CABG 3. Need for concomitant non-coronary surgery (e.g. valve replacement) 4. Intolerance of or Allergy to Ticagrelor or ASA or any of their ingredients 5. History of bleeding diathesis within three months prior presentation 6. History of significant gastrointestinal bleeding within six months prior presentation 7. History of intracranial hemorrhage 8. History of moderate to severe liver impairment (Child Pugh B or C) 9. Chronic renal insufficiency requiring dialysis 10. Patient with an increased risk of bradycardic events (e.g. patients without a pacemaker who have sick sinus syndrome, 2nd or 3rd degree AV block or bradycardic-related syncope) 11. Known, clinically important thrombocytopenia (i.e. \<100.000/µl) 12. Known, clinically important anaemia (i.e. \<10mg/dl) 13. Participation in another investigational drug or device study in the last 30 days 14. Pregnancy or lactation (for premenopausal women 2 methods of reliable contraception, one of which must be barrier method, are required); in women with childbearing potential a pregnancy test is mandatory 15. Concomitant oral or intravenous therapy (see examples below) with strong CYP3A inhibitors, CYP3A substrates with narrow therapeutic indices, or strong CYP3A inducers which cannot be stopped for the course of the study * Strong inhibitors: ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, telithromycin, clarithromycin, nefazadone, ritonavir, saquinavir, nelfinavir, indinavir, atazanavir, over 1 litre daily of grapefruit juice. * Substrates with narrow therapeutic index: cyclosporine, quinidine. * Strong inducers: rifampin/rifampicin, phenytoin, carbamazepine. 16. Life expectancy less than 12 months that may result in protocol non-compliance or a risk for being lost to follow-up, active cancer 17. Indication for major surgery (e.g. cancer treatment, carotid surgery, cerebral surgery, major vascular surgery) 18. Previous enrollment or randomization of treatment in the present study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MACCEat 12 months after coronary artery bypass surgeryComposite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major bleeding eventswithin 12 months after coronary arerty bypass surgeryIncidence of major bleeding events
All cause deathat 12 months after coronary artery bypass surgeryAll cause death
Cardiovascular deathat 12 months after coronary artery bypass surgery
Target Lesion Revascularizationat 12 months after coronary artery bypass surgery
Strokeat 12 months after coronary artery bypass surgery
Myocardial Infarctionat 12 months after coronary artery bypass surgery

Countries

Austria, Germany, Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026