Skip to content

Impact of Adalimumab (Humira®) Therapy on Selected Health Care Resource Utilization and Sick Leave in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis in Clinical Practice

Impact of Adalimumab (Humira®) Therapy on Selected Health Care Resource Utilization and Sick Leave in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis in Clinical Practice

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01754727
Acronym
IDEA
Enrollment
452
Registered
2012-12-21
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2017-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankylosing Spondylitis

Keywords

Ankylosing Spondylitis, Effectiveness, Post-marketing observational study (PMOS), Adalimumab, Humira®

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the proportion of AS patients achieving treatment response to adalimumab therapy.

Detailed description

This post-marketing observational study (PMOS) was performed in a multi-country, multi-center, single-arm format. Data were collected prospectively and retrospectively. Adult patients with diagnosis of AS who were assigned for treatment with adalimumab (Humira®) were eligible for participation. Each patient included in this study was to be observed during his/her adalimumab treatment for a maximum of 12 month period. During this period four follow-up visits were planned for observation of the patient and documentation of data. Ideally, these visits should have been performed approximately 3 (V1), 6 (V2), 9 (V3) and 12 (V4) months after the baseline visit (V0).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Had ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and was eligible to start and/or continue adalimumab therapy according to the local product label and prescription guidelines, * Had been started on adalimumab therapy no more than one (1) month prior to the study enrollment * Had negative result of tuberculosis (TB) screening test or was receiving tuberculosis prophylaxis as per local guidelines * Provided written Authorization to the investigator to use and/or disclose personal and/or health data, or Informed Consent if requested by the Local Regulations

Exclusion criteria

\- Had contraindications for the treatment with adalimumab

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50 at Month 12Month 0 (baseline) and Month 12The BASDAI score was determined using a simple, self-reported questionnaire that consists of 6 questions on disease activity. Each question is scored from 0 to 10 (0 = no symptoms, 10 = very severe symptoms). The BASDAI 50 score captures patients with 50% reduction in the BASDAI score compared to baseline as observed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving At Least 2.0 Score Decrease in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity (ASDAS) Score From BaselineMonth 3, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12The ASDAS tool is a self-administered questionnaire plus an objective laboratory evaluation. The questionnaire covers disease activity, back pain, and peripheral pain/swelling assessed on a visual analogue scale (from 0 (normal) to 10 (extreme pain or disability) cm) and duration of morning stiffness on a numerical rating scale (from 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 representing a duration of 2 hours or longer). The laboratory parameter is a measurement of C-reactive protein (mg/L) (CRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h) (ESR). Data from five variables (disease activity, back pain, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling, and either CRP or ESR values) are combined to yield a score ranging from 0 to no defined upper limit. Higher scores indicate higher disease activity. Clinically important improvement is defined as a change \>= 1.1 units, and major improvement is defined as a change \>= 2.0 units.
Mean Change in the Number of Hospital Inpatient Days12 months prior to month 0 (baseline) and 12 months prior to month 12Difference in the number of hospital inpatient days during 12 months of adalimumab therapy and 12 months preceding the introduction of adalimumab therapy.
Mean Change in the Number of Hospitalizations12 months prior to month 0 (baseline) and 12 months prior to month 12Difference in the number of hospitalizations during 12 months of adalimumab therapy and 12 months preceding the introduction of adalimumab therapy.
Mean Change in the Number of Sick Leave Days12 months prior to month 0 (baseline) and 12 months prior to month 12Difference in the number of sick leave days during 12 months of adalimumab therapy and 12 months preceding the introduction of adalimumab therapy (in employed subjects only)
Percentage of Participants Achieving BASDAI 50Month 3, Month 6 and Month 9The BASDAI score was determined using a simple, self-reported questionnaire that consists of 6 questions on disease activity. Each question is scored from 0 to 10 (0 = no symptoms, 10 = very severe symptoms). The BASDAI 50 score captures patients with 50% reduction in the BASDAI score compared to baseline.
Mean Change in the Number of Outpatient Visits to Each Kind of Health Care Provider12 months prior to month 0 (baseline) and 12 months prior to month 12Difference in the number of outpatient visits to each kind of health care provider which includes general practitioner, rheumatologist, other specialists (ophthalmologist, gastroenterologist, dermatologist, physiatrist), physiotherapist and rheumatology nurse, during 12 months of adalimumab therapy and 12 months preceding the introduction of adalimumab therapy.
Mean Change From Baseline in BASDAI ScoreMonth 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12 and Month 12 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)The BASDAI score was determined using a simple, self-reported questionnaire that consists of 6 questions on disease activity. Each question is scored from 0 to 10 (0 = no symptoms, 10 = very severe symptoms).
Mean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity (ASDAS) ScoreMonth 3, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12The ASDAS tool is a self-administered questionnaire plus an objective laboratory evaluation. The questionnaire covers disease activity, back pain, and peripheral pain/swelling assessed on a visual analogue scale (from 0 (normal) to 10 (extreme pain or disability) cm) and duration of morning stiffness on a numerical rating scale (from 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 representing a duration of 2 hours or longer). The laboratory parameter is a measurement of C-reactive protein (mg/L) (CRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h) (ESR). Data from five variables (disease activity, back pain, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling, and either CRP or ESR values) are combined to yield a score ranging from 0 to no defined upper limit. Higher scores indicate higher disease activity. Remission is defined as ASDAS score \<1.3. Clinically important improvement is defined as a change \>= 1.1 units, and major improvement is defined as a change \>= 2.0 units.
Mean Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) ScoreMonth 3, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12The BASFI is a numeric rating scale that uses self-reported patient evaluations to measure physical function impairment caused by AS. It is a ten questions, each question was scored on a numerical rating scale that ranged from 0 (no functional impairment) to 10 (maximal impairment). The mean of the ten questions was the total BASFI score. A higher score indicates more severe impairment of functioning.
Mean Change in the Number of Sick Leaves12 months prior to month 0 (baseline) and 12 months prior to month 12Difference in the number of sick leaves during 12 months of adalimumab therapy and 12 months preceding the introduction of adalimumab therapy (in employed subjects only).

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 452 participants were enrolled: 450 were in the main analysis set (MAS) population; 2 were excluded from MAS, as adalimumab treatment was not documented within this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis
Participants with ankylosing spondylitis treated with adalimumab in routine clinical practice.
450
Total450

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdalimumab Treatment was not Documented2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParticipants With Ankylosing Spondylitis
Age, Continuous42.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Gender
Female
141 Participants
Gender
Male
309 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
19 / 450

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50 at Month 12

The BASDAI score was determined using a simple, self-reported questionnaire that consists of 6 questions on disease activity. Each question is scored from 0 to 10 (0 = no symptoms, 10 = very severe symptoms). The BASDAI 50 score captures patients with 50% reduction in the BASDAI score compared to baseline as observed.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline) and Month 12

Population: Analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of adalimumab with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisPercentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50 at Month 1278.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity (ASDAS) Score

The ASDAS tool is a self-administered questionnaire plus an objective laboratory evaluation. The questionnaire covers disease activity, back pain, and peripheral pain/swelling assessed on a visual analogue scale (from 0 (normal) to 10 (extreme pain or disability) cm) and duration of morning stiffness on a numerical rating scale (from 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 representing a duration of 2 hours or longer). The laboratory parameter is a measurement of C-reactive protein (mg/L) (CRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h) (ESR). Data from five variables (disease activity, back pain, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling, and either CRP or ESR values) are combined to yield a score ranging from 0 to no defined upper limit. Higher scores indicate higher disease activity. Remission is defined as ASDAS score \<1.3. Clinically important improvement is defined as a change \>= 1.1 units, and major improvement is defined as a change \>= 2.0 units.

Time frame: Month 3, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12

Population: Analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of adalimumab with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity (ASDAS) ScoreMonth 3 (N=424)-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity (ASDAS) ScoreMonth 6 (N=393)-2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity (ASDAS) ScoreMonth 9 (N=364)-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity (ASDAS) ScoreMonth 12 (N=349)-2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity (ASDAS) ScoreMonth 12 LOCF (N=428)-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in BASDAI Score

The BASDAI score was determined using a simple, self-reported questionnaire that consists of 6 questions on disease activity. Each question is scored from 0 to 10 (0 = no symptoms, 10 = very severe symptoms).

Time frame: Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12 and Month 12 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

Population: Analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of adalimumab with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in BASDAI ScoreMonth 6 (N=395)-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in BASDAI ScoreMonth 9 (N=367)-4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in BASDAI ScoreMonth 3 (N=425)-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in BASDAI ScoreMonth 12 (N=351)-4.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in BASDAI ScoreMonth 12 LOCF (N=429)-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) Score

The BASFI is a numeric rating scale that uses self-reported patient evaluations to measure physical function impairment caused by AS. It is a ten questions, each question was scored on a numerical rating scale that ranged from 0 (no functional impairment) to 10 (maximal impairment). The mean of the ten questions was the total BASFI score. A higher score indicates more severe impairment of functioning.

Time frame: Month 3, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12

Population: Analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of adalimumab with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) ScoreMonth 3 (N=414)-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) ScoreMonth 6 (N=381)-3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) ScoreMonth 9 (N=356)-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) ScoreMonth 12 (N=339)-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) ScoreMonth 12 LOCF (N=422)-3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Secondary

Mean Change in the Number of Hospital Inpatient Days

Difference in the number of hospital inpatient days during 12 months of adalimumab therapy and 12 months preceding the introduction of adalimumab therapy.

Time frame: 12 months prior to month 0 (baseline) and 12 months prior to month 12

Population: Analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of adalimumab with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change in the Number of Hospital Inpatient Days-19.6 DaysStandard Deviation 45
Secondary

Mean Change in the Number of Hospitalizations

Difference in the number of hospitalizations during 12 months of adalimumab therapy and 12 months preceding the introduction of adalimumab therapy.

Time frame: 12 months prior to month 0 (baseline) and 12 months prior to month 12

Population: Analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of adalimumab with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change in the Number of Hospitalizations-1.9 Number of admissions to hospitalStandard Deviation 4.4
Secondary

Mean Change in the Number of Outpatient Visits to Each Kind of Health Care Provider

Difference in the number of outpatient visits to each kind of health care provider which includes general practitioner, rheumatologist, other specialists (ophthalmologist, gastroenterologist, dermatologist, physiatrist), physiotherapist and rheumatology nurse, during 12 months of adalimumab therapy and 12 months preceding the introduction of adalimumab therapy.

Time frame: 12 months prior to month 0 (baseline) and 12 months prior to month 12

Population: Analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of adalimumab with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change in the Number of Outpatient Visits to Each Kind of Health Care ProviderOverall (N=403)-12.1 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 23.1
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change in the Number of Outpatient Visits to Each Kind of Health Care ProviderGeneral practitioner (N=354)-4.3 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 8.7
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change in the Number of Outpatient Visits to Each Kind of Health Care ProviderRheumatologists (N=399)-4.4 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 8.3
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change in the Number of Outpatient Visits to Each Kind of Health Care ProviderOphthalmologist (N=313)-1.1 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 4.3
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change in the Number of Outpatient Visits to Each Kind of Health Care ProviderGastroenterologist (N=309)-0.6 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 3.1
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change in the Number of Outpatient Visits to Each Kind of Health Care ProviderDermatologist (N=311)-0.4 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 2.5
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change in the Number of Outpatient Visits to Each Kind of Health Care ProviderPhysiatrist (N=310)-0.5 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 1.9
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change in the Number of Outpatient Visits to Each Kind of Health Care ProviderPhysiotherapist (N=315)-1.9 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 10.6
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change in the Number of Outpatient Visits to Each Kind of Health Care ProviderRheumatology nurse (N=315)-0.5 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 7.5
Secondary

Mean Change in the Number of Sick Leave Days

Difference in the number of sick leave days during 12 months of adalimumab therapy and 12 months preceding the introduction of adalimumab therapy (in employed subjects only)

Time frame: 12 months prior to month 0 (baseline) and 12 months prior to month 12

Population: Analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of adalimumab with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change in the Number of Sick Leave Days-27.3 DaysStandard Deviation 66.3
Secondary

Mean Change in the Number of Sick Leaves

Difference in the number of sick leaves during 12 months of adalimumab therapy and 12 months preceding the introduction of adalimumab therapy (in employed subjects only).

Time frame: 12 months prior to month 0 (baseline) and 12 months prior to month 12

Population: Analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of adalimumab with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisMean Change in the Number of Sick Leaves-2.1 Number of sick leavesStandard Deviation 5.3
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving At Least 2.0 Score Decrease in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity (ASDAS) Score From Baseline

The ASDAS tool is a self-administered questionnaire plus an objective laboratory evaluation. The questionnaire covers disease activity, back pain, and peripheral pain/swelling assessed on a visual analogue scale (from 0 (normal) to 10 (extreme pain or disability) cm) and duration of morning stiffness on a numerical rating scale (from 0 to 10, with 0 being none and 10 representing a duration of 2 hours or longer). The laboratory parameter is a measurement of C-reactive protein (mg/L) (CRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h) (ESR). Data from five variables (disease activity, back pain, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling, and either CRP or ESR values) are combined to yield a score ranging from 0 to no defined upper limit. Higher scores indicate higher disease activity. Clinically important improvement is defined as a change \>= 1.1 units, and major improvement is defined as a change \>= 2.0 units.

Time frame: Month 3, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12

Population: Analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of adalimumab with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisPercentage of Participants Achieving At Least 2.0 Score Decrease in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity (ASDAS) Score From BaselineMonth 3 (N=424)44.3 percentage of participants
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisPercentage of Participants Achieving At Least 2.0 Score Decrease in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity (ASDAS) Score From BaselineMonth 6 (N=393)54.5 percentage of participants
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisPercentage of Participants Achieving At Least 2.0 Score Decrease in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity (ASDAS) Score From BaselineMonth 9 (N=364)63.5 percentage of participants
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisPercentage of Participants Achieving At Least 2.0 Score Decrease in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity (ASDAS) Score From BaselineMonth 12 (N=349)64.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving BASDAI 50

The BASDAI score was determined using a simple, self-reported questionnaire that consists of 6 questions on disease activity. Each question is scored from 0 to 10 (0 = no symptoms, 10 = very severe symptoms). The BASDAI 50 score captures patients with 50% reduction in the BASDAI score compared to baseline.

Time frame: Month 3, Month 6 and Month 9

Population: Analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of adalimumab with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisPercentage of Participants Achieving BASDAI 50Month 6 (N=395)68.1 percentage of participants
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisPercentage of Participants Achieving BASDAI 50Month 9 (N=367)76.0 percentage of participants
Participants With Ankylosing SpondylitisPercentage of Participants Achieving BASDAI 50Month 3 (N=425)52.5 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026