Skip to content

Effects of Ranolazine on Coronary Flow Reserve in Symptomatic Diabetic Patients and CAD

Effects of Ranolazine on Coronary Flow Reserve in Symptomatic Patients With Diabetes and Suspected or Known Coronary Artery Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01754259
Acronym
RAND-CFR
Enrollment
47
Registered
2012-12-21
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2017-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Angina, Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes, Type I, Diabetes, Type II

Keywords

type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, exertion angina, suspected CAD, known CAD

Brief summary

Coronary vascular dysfunction is highly prevalent among patients with known or suspected Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)1, increases the severity of inducible myocardial ischemia (beyond the effects of upstream coronary obstruction)2, and identifies patients at high risk for serious adverse events, including cardiac death1, 3-5. Diabetic patients without known CAD with impaired coronary vascular function show a risk of cardiac death comparable to, and possibly higher, than that for non-diabetic patients with known CAD10. In the setting of increased oxygen demand, coronary vasodilator dysfunction can upset the supply-demand relationship and lead to myocardial ischemia, subclinical left ventricular dysfunction (diastolic and systolic), and symptoms. The significance of microvascular coronary dysfunction is increasingly recognized as invasive and non-invasive (PET) methods of quantifying CFR become available. Importantly, current treatment strategies for obstructive CAD, such as percutaneous coronary intervention with angioplasty and stenting, are not helpful in microvascular disease. Similarly, mortality-altering treatments for systolic heart failure, such as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, have not been beneficial in treating diastolic dysfunction.

Detailed description

Ranolazine is a novel anti-anginal agent which inhibits the late sodium current in cardiomyocytes, decreasing sodium and calcium overload. In ischemia, excess of intracellular calcium may impair myocyte relaxation and contribute to ventricular diastolic stiffness, which in turn affects myocardial contractility and perfusion. Ranolazine is FDA-approved for treatment of chronic angina. In three randomized, placebo-controlled trials of patients with stable angina, it was shown to increase exercise time free of angina and ST-segment depression, increase exercise capacity and decrease angina when used in combination with established antianginal agents including diltiazem, amlodipine or atenolol, and reduce the frequency of angina on patients on maximum doses of amlodipine.Similarly, in a large population of patients with acute coronary syndromes, ranolazine also decreased exertional angina symptoms and incidence of arrhythmias, with no effect on mortality. Interestingly, in this same study, it significantly improved hemoglobin A1c and recurrent ischemia in patients with diabetes mellitus, and reduced the incidence of increased hemoglobin A1c in patients without known prior hyperglycemia. Although the anti-ischemic effect of ranolazine is thought to be mediated in part by increased myocardial blood flow,there is currently limited evidence for such an effect on tissue perfusion. A previous study in women without overt CAD did not detect improved myocardial blood flow after treatment with ranolazine. In that study, however, coronary hyperemia was elicited with adenosine (which uncouples blood flow from cardiac work, and reflects predominantly endothelial-independent vasodilation) rather than exercise, which triggers a more complex interplay between metabolic demand, coronary hemodynamics, and vasodilator response. Thus, there is a need for additional investigation of whether the beneficial effects of ranolazine on exertional symptoms are directly related to improved global tissue perfusion. Such evidence would support the use of ranolazine as an anti-ischemic therapy in the challenging population of symptomatic patients with evidence of microvascular dysfunction without obstructive CAD.

Interventions

DRUGRanolazine

Subject will receive labeled bottles containing tablets with ranolazine 500 mg or a matching placebo provided by the sponsor. Each patient will receive both ranolazine and placebo for 4 weeks, but both the investigator and subject are blinded to the order.

DRUGPlacebo

Subject will receive labeled bottles containing tablets with ranolazine 500 mg or a matching placebo provided by the sponsor. Each patient will receive both ranolazine and placebo for 4 weeks, but both the investigator and subject are blinded to the order.

Sponsors

Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Intervention model description

Subject will receive labeled bottles containing tablets with ranolazine 500 mg or a matching placebo provided by the sponsor. Each patient will receive both ranolazine and placebo for 4 weeks, but both the investigator and subject are blinded to the order.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus 2. anginal symptoms and/or exertional dyspnea; 3. ability to exercise and achieve an exercise tolerance of at least 3 METS but not higher than 9 METS either on a treadmill or bicycle exercise tolerance test; 4. perfusion sum stress score (SSS) ≤ 6, as assessed by initial PET

Exclusion criteria

1. patients not fulfilling inclusion criteria 2. patients with evidence of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis \>50% 3. patients with evidence of new obstructive CAD not on optimal medical therapy 4. evidence of angiographic disease and/or inducible myocardial ischemia on stress testing planning to undergo revascularization within the following 3 months 5. history of cardiomyopathy (LVEF \<40%) or significant valvular heart disease 6. uncontrolled hypertension (SBP \>180 mm Hg at screening) 7. gait instability, lower extremity amputations preventing exercise 9\. significant liver dysfunction (LFTs \>3x upper limits of normal), including cirrhosis 10. prolonged QT (QTc \>450 and \>470 ms for men and women, respectively) or concomitant use of drugs that prolong QT interval (including methadone and antiarrhythmics such as sotalol, amiodarone, and quinidine) 11. use of drugs that inhibit CYP3A such as ketoconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, clarithromycin, erythromycin, diltiazem, verapamil, nefazodone, nelfinavir, ritonavir, lopinavir, ritonavir, indinavir, and saquinavir 12. use of drugs that induce CYP3A such rifampin, rifabutin, rifapentine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine, and St. John's wort 13. atrial fibrillation / inability to hold breath for ≥ 10 seconds (in patients in whom CTA will be performed) 14. eGFR \< 50 ml/min or end stage renal disease on dialysis 15. allergy to intravenous contrast 16. pregnant or lactating women, or women of childbearing potential not using an acceptable form of birth control (negative pregnancy test also required) 17. inability to fit safely in PET/CT scanner

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Post-exercise Coronary Vasodilator Reserve4 weeksChange (from baseline) in post-exercise coronary vasodilator reserve, as measured by PET imaging at 4 weeks post randomization. Per-patient global coronary flow reserve (CFR) was calculated as the ratio of absolute MBF at stress over rest for the entire left ventricle. Quantitation of MBF was performed by two operators blinded to patient, treatment period and treatment order.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in LV Diastolic Function4 weeksChange (from baseline) in LV diastolic function reflected primarily in mitral annular early diastolic relaxation velocity (E') at 4 weeks post randomization. LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (used to calculate LVEF), left atrial volume, septal and lateral peak early diastolic tissue velocity (e'), septal and lateral peak systolic tissue velocity (s'), and mitral inflow velocity (E) were all measured in accordance with ASE guidelines.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The order of ranolazine and placebo exposure was randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio by the Investigational Drug Service at BWH. During the 28-day treatment periods, ranolazine and matching placebo were administered as 500 mg by mouth twice daily for 1 week and increased to 1000 mg by mouth twice daily for 3 weeks, as tolerated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ranolazine
subject will receive labeled bottles containing tablets with ranolazine 500 mg or a matching placebo provided by the sponsor. Ranolazine: Subject will receive labeled bottles containing tablets with ranolazine 500 mg or a matching placebo provided by the sponsor.
23
Placebo
Subject will receive labeled bottles containing tablets with ranolazine 500 mg or a matching placebo provided by the sponsor. Placebo Pill: Subject will receive labeled bottles containing tablets with ranolazine 500 mg or a matching placebo provided by the sponsor.
24
Total47

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event31
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalRanolazine
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants28 Participants16 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants19 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
6 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
18 Participants34 Participants16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Indian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 Participants47 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants24 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants23 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 230 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 232 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 231 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Post-exercise Coronary Vasodilator Reserve

Change (from baseline) in post-exercise coronary vasodilator reserve, as measured by PET imaging at 4 weeks post randomization. Per-patient global coronary flow reserve (CFR) was calculated as the ratio of absolute MBF at stress over rest for the entire left ventricle. Quantitation of MBF was performed by two operators blinded to patient, treatment period and treatment order.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RanolazineChange in Post-exercise Coronary Vasodilator Reserve-4 % change
PlaceboChange in Post-exercise Coronary Vasodilator Reserve2 % change
Secondary

Change in LV Diastolic Function

Change (from baseline) in LV diastolic function reflected primarily in mitral annular early diastolic relaxation velocity (E') at 4 weeks post randomization. LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (used to calculate LVEF), left atrial volume, septal and lateral peak early diastolic tissue velocity (e'), septal and lateral peak systolic tissue velocity (s'), and mitral inflow velocity (E) were all measured in accordance with ASE guidelines.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RanolazineChange in LV Diastolic Function1 % change
PlaceboChange in LV Diastolic Function-2 % change

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026