Skip to content

Exercise in Severely Disabled Patients With MS

Endurance Training in Severely Disabled Patients With MS - a Feasibility Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01752660
Enrollment
12
Registered
2012-12-19
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2013-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Exercise therapy, Aerobic training, Endurance training

Brief summary

In the last decade physical exercise has become an accepted and integrated part of rehabilitation in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, no studies have evaluated whether the most severely disabled patients can tolerate and benefit from exercise therapy. The purpose of this study is therefore to evaluate the feasibility of endurance training in severely disabled patients with MS.

Detailed description

For many years, patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have been advised not to participate in physical exercise. This advice was given in part because some patients were reported to experience symptom instability during exercise as a consequence of increased body temperature. A further argument was that avoiding exercise would preserve energy and thereby result in less fatigue, leaving more energy for activities of daily living. During the last decade, it has been more common to recommend exercise for MS patients, because of its recently proven beneficial effects in these patients. Resistance- and endurance training constitutes the two extremes of basic physical exercise. To gain insight into the effects of exercise it therefore makes sense to understand the extremes. In mild to moderately impaired MS patients endurance training is well tolerated and providing beneficial effects. However, this exercise modality has not yet been tested in severely disabled patients, and it is therefore unclear if endurance training is feasible and beneficial in these patients. The investigators have, therefore, designed a feasibility study evaluating the effects of 4 weeks of endurance training in severely disabled MS patients (Expanded Disability Status Scale score \> 6). Patients are inpatients at one of the national MS hospitals and endurance training is added to the usual care, and compared to usual care only (control group). Exercise frequency is 3 times per week, and intensity is controlled by HR measurements during exercise.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALEndurance training

Standard care during a 4 week inpatient stay at a Danish multiple sclerosis rehabilitation center added 3 weekly sessions of endurance training for the upper extremity.

BEHAVIORALStandard care

Standard care during a 4 week inpatient stay at a Danish multiple sclerosis rehabilitation center.

Sponsors

The Danish MS Society
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Danish MS Hospitals, Haslev and Ry
CollaboratorOTHER
Aarhus University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed informed consent -\>18 years * Primary progressive or secondary progressive MS according to the McDonald criteria * 6.5 ≤ EDSS ≤ 8.0 and pyramidal score between 1 and 4 * Maximal walking distance ≤ 10m

Exclusion criteria

* Patients are excluded if they: * have dementia,alcoholism, or pacemaker treatment * any serious medical comorbidities * are pregnant * have done systematic endurance training (\>1day/week) within the last 3 months. * complete less than 80% of the planned training sessions * medical conditions that exclude performance of a maximal endurance test.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Exercise complianceExercise compliance is registered immediatly after all planned exercise sessions during the 4 week interventionCompliance to exercise is registered and serve as the primary outcome.
Drop out rateNumber of participants who drop out is registered at the post measurement just after the intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peak oxygen consumption1-2 day before the intervention and 1-2days after the 4 week intervention peak oxygen is measuredMeasurement of peak oxygen consumption during a ramp protocol on armergometer.
Box and Block test1-2 day before the intervention and 1-2days after the 4 week intervention the box and block test is performed
Sit to stand test1-2 day before the intervention and 1-2days after the 4 week intervention the sit to stand test is performed
Handgrip test1-2 day before the intervention and 1-2days after the 4 week intervention the handgrip test is performed
Wheel-chair test1-2 day before the intervention and 1-2days after the 4 week intervention the wheel-chair test is performed

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026