Skip to content

EF5 in Melanoma Patients

Pilot Study to Characterize the HRHV Axis in the Microenvironment of Melanoma in Patients Undergoing Isolated Limb Infusion or Hypothermic Isolated Limb Perfusion With Melphalan

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01752257
Enrollment
15
Registered
2012-12-19
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2015-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melanoma

Keywords

Melanoma

Brief summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to determine the prevalence of markers of chronic and cycling hypoxia and reactive species stress (oxidative and nitrosative) in the melanoma tumor microenvironment. The study is based around four cornerstone features of the pathologic microenvironment - Hypoxia, Reactive Species (reactive oxygen and nitrogen species), HIF-1 and VEGF, which the investigators term the HRHV axis. Patients with in-transit melanoma (AJCC Stage IIIB or IIIC) (1) will be administered the hypoxia marker drug, EF5, 24 hr prior to isolated limb infusion (ILI) or hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP). Tumor biopsies will be performed just prior to ILI or HILP, at the 30 minute time point during ILI (or 60 minute time point during HILP), AND 24 hours after ILI or HILP. Tissues obtained will be snap frozen and subsequently analyzed for EF5 binding. Immunohistochemical analysis of a cohort of immunohistochemical and urine markers that depict the HRHV axis will also be examined. The association of the markers with the presence of hypoxia, as determined by EF5 positivity, will be determined. Data from this pilot study will be used to establish the prevalence of markers of the HRHV axis in melanoma. This information will be crucial for future human trials in which the HRHV axis is therapeutically targeted.

Interventions

DRUGEF5 Hypoxia

EF5 is a dye used to measure hypoxia

Sponsors

Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Douglas Tyler
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

3.1. Inclusion criteria * Histologically confirmed AJCC Stage IIIB/IIIC/IV extremity melanoma who are undergoing ILI or HILP and have tumor available for biopsy (NOTE: patients with only 1 in-transit lesion are NOT eligible) * Age ≥18 * KPS status ≥ 70 * Bilirubin ≤ 1.5x normal * Creatinine ≤ 1.8 ( -EF5 is primarily excreted via the kidney) * WBC \> 3000/mm3 and platelets \> 100,000/mm3 3.2.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy or breast feeding. A negative serum pregnancy test is required of any women childbearing potential prior to enrollment. Pregnant women are excluded from this study because EF5 is an agent with potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects. Because there is an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with EF5, breastfeeding should be discontinued if the mother is given EF5. * Allergy to IV contrast dye * History of grade III or IV peripheral neuropathy as defined by the NCI CTC (other 2-nitroimidazole compounds are neurotoxic) * Previous history of any malignancy treated with radiotherapy and/or chemohormonal therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spatial comparison between marker proteins and hypoxia.2 yearsWe will describe the distribution of the markers at each of the three time points with boxplots and means (with 80% confidence intervals). The variance of each marker will be partitioned into three parts: variance due to the time (i.e., treatment) effect, variance among patients, and error variance. This calculation can easily be done by fitting a general linear model in which marker is regressed on an n-1 degree of freedom patient effect (where n is the number of patients) and a 2 degree of freedom time effect. The error variance with 2\*(n-1) degrees of freedom is of course equal to the variance of the interaction of patient with time. Obviously, we would hope to find that the variance for the time effect is larger than either of the other two variances.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026