Skip to content

COmparison of Xience PrimE Versus REsolute Integrity in Diabetes or Small Vessel Disease

Study for Investigate the Effectiveness and Safety of Resolute Integrity or Xience Prime in Diabetes or Small Vessels Lesion Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01752127
Acronym
COPERES
Enrollment
600
Registered
2012-12-19
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2012-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary

Keywords

Drug-eluting stent, diabetes, small vessel disease

Brief summary

The newer generation ZES (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, Resolute Integrity) and EES (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Illinois, Xience Prime) were introduced to South Korea. Although these are thought to be superior in effect and stability compared to ZES and EES of previous generation, there are few clinical data regarding the high risk groups of diabetes patients or small vessels lesion. Moreover, looking at the 8.3% of restenosis in Resolute All Comer study (23% diabetes), the investigators could not know the outcome in high risk patients such as diabetes or small vessels lesion. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of Resolute Integrity or Xience Prime in diabetes or small vessels lesion patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREpercutaneous coronary intervention using drug eluting stent

1\. Intracoronary stenting 1. The procedure could be conducted via brachial, radial or femoral approaches. 2. There are no restrictions regarding lesion's length or diameter. For long lesions, overlapping of several stents would be allowed but only allocated type of stents should be used. 3. When several lesions are included in the study of a patient, each lesion may be allocated in different groups. Only if deployment of the allocated stent is not possible, crossing to other stent would be allowed. 4. Direct stenting or bifurcation stenting is allowed. 5. Predilation before stenting, IVUS examination, and administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor would be determined by investigator.

Sponsors

Chonbuk National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \> 18 years 2. Patients requiring stent procedure (visual diameter stenosis ≥ 50%) 3. Stable angina with evidence of myocardial ischemia, acute coronary syndrome(ST segment elevation, non-ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction, and unstable angina) 4. Patients diagnosed of type 2 diabetes or small vessel disease 5. Patients willing to participate in the study through written consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Those hypersensitive to or abstaining from heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel, contrast medium, zotarolimus, or everolimus. 2. Pregnant women or those having future plans for pregnancy. 3. Those having hemorrhagic disease or blood-clotting disorders (including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia), or those rejecting blood transfusion. 4. Those having medical history of digestive and urinary system bleeding during the last 3 months, or who have received major surgery within 2 months. 5. Those with thrombocytopenia (\< 100,000/mm3) or hemoglobin 10.0 g/dL or less. 6. Those planning a surgery that requires the discontinuation of antiplatelet drugs within next 12 months (especially, thienopyridines type). 7. When the remaining survival period is expected to be less than 1 year. 8. Restenosis lesion 9. Left main coronary artery lesion 10. Saphenous vein graft stenosis lesion 11. Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 30% 12. Cardiac shock 13. Those with liver function failure: When liver enzyme level (ALT) is 3 times the normal upper limit. 14. Type I diabetes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
in-segment late lumen loss (mm)at 12month12month

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
major adverse cardiac events(MACE) at 12month12month1\) Occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during 12 months * Cardiac death * Target vessel related myocardial infarction * Ischemia driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) * Ischemia driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) * Definite / probable stent thrombosis by ARC definition
MACE at 24month24month2\) Occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during 24 months * Cardiac death * Target vessel related myocardial infarction * Ischemia driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) * Ischemia driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) * Definite / probable stent thrombosis by ARC definition
procedure success rate1 day (after procedure)Procedure success rate proportion of investigational stent deployed successfully without chage to other stent

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactLae young Jung, fellow
youngjoin@naver.com82-63-250-2204

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026