Skip to content

Family-mismatched/Haploidentical Donors Versus Matched Unrelated Donors

The Comparison of Transplantation From Family-mismatched/Haploidentical Donors With Matched Unrelated Donors in Adult Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01751997
Enrollment
116
Registered
2012-12-18
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2024-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Brief summary

This study will compare the clinical outcomes of transplants from family-mismatched/haploidentical donors (FMT) with transplants from 8/8-matched unrelated donor (MUT), which is a current gold standard donors when lacking of HLA-matched-siblings 1. Primary objectives: Overall survival of FMT may be similar to that of MUT 2. Secondary objectives: i. Comparison of disease-free survival, relapse, non-relapse mortality, immune reconstitution cytomegalovirus infection, and acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease between FMT and MUT. ii. Investigation of possible biomarkers related with above events after transplantation

Detailed description

For patients lacking an HLA-identical sibling, 8/8-matched unrelated donors are currently the gold standard for a donor, since outcomes after HLA-identical sibling have been compared to 8/8-matched unrelated donors. Currently, there are three alternative graft sources, including mismatched unrelated donors, familial mismatch/haploidentical donors, and umbilical cord bloods. Compared with other sources, transplants from familial mismatch/haploidentical donors (FMT) have the benefit of an immediate availability of a donor, particularly for those patients who urgently need transplantation. Initial reports had characterized FMT to a poor engraftment and a high incidence of graft-versus-host disease. However, outcomes of FMT have significantly improved over the past decade in the optimization of conditioning regimen and graft selection to allow a stable engraftment across major HLA barriers, with promising leukemia-free survival in adults with acute leukemia. Despite the encouraging results and potential benefit of FMT, there have been few studies comparing clinical outcomes of FMT with other donor types, particularly in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as a single disease. Since August 2008, we have been continuously performing FMT using unmanipulated donor cells and a less aggressive conditioning regimen in high-risk AML lacking an HLA-identical sibling, 8/8 or 7/8-matched unrelated donors. We reported the feasibility of FMT using our novel reduced-intensity regimen without ex vivo T-cell depletion, showing early results similar to outcomes of transplant from 8/8-matched unrelated donors (MUT). This study will test the hypothesis that overall survival at 3 years after FMT is similar to overall survival after MUT.

Interventions

DRUGTransplants from 8/8-matched Unrelated donors

* Myeloablative conditioning 1. Total body irradiation; 165 cGy, every 12 hours, 8 doses, days -7 to -4 (total 1320 cGy) 2. Cyclophosphamide; 60 mg/kg/day, IV for 30 minutes, days -3 to -2 (total 120 mg/kg) 3. Antithymocyte globulin (ATG); 1.25 mg/kg/day, IV for 6 hours, days -3 to -2, (total 2.5 mg/kg) * Reduced-intensity conditioning; older patients (age \> 55 years) and/or patients with comorbidities 1. Fludarabine; 30 mg/m\^2/day, IV for 1 hour, days -8 to -4 (total 150 mg/m\^2) 2. Busulfex; 3.2 mg/kg/day, IV for 3 hours, days -3 to -2 (total 6.4 mg/kg) 3. Total body irradiation; 200 cGy, every 12 hours 2 doses, days -1 (total 400 cGy) 4. ATG; 1.25 mg/kg/day, IV for 6 hours, days -3 to -2, (total 2.5 mg/kg) * GVHD prophylaxis 1. Tacrolimus; 0.03 mg/kg/day, IV for 24 hours from day -1 (0.12 mg/kg/day, PO, if tolerable) 2. Methotrexate; 5 mg/m\^2/day, IV push, days +1, +3, +6, +11

DRUGTransplants from family-mismatched/haploidentical donors

* Reduced-intensity conditioning 1. Total body irradiation; 200 cGy, every 12 hours, 4 doses, days -9 to -8 (total 800 cGy) 2. Fludarabine; 30 mg/m\^2/day, IV for 1 hour, days -7 to -3 (total 150 mg/m\^2) 3. Busulfex; 3.2 mg/kg/day, IV for 3 hours, days -6 to -5 (total 6.4 mg/kg) 4. ATG; 1.25 mg/kg/day, IV for 6 hours, days -4 to -1 (total 5.0 mg/kg) * GVHD prophylaxis 1. Tacrolimus; 0.03 mg/kg/day, IV for 24 hours from day -1 (0.12 mg/kg/day, PO, if tolerable) 2. Methotrexate; 5 mg/m\^2/day, IV push, days +1, +3, +6, +11

Sponsors

Byung-Sik Cho
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with AML aged from 18 to 65 years * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance \< 2 * High risk group for relapse 1. Complete remission (CR) 1 with unfavorable prognostic factor; presenting white blood cell \> 100,000/microliter or prior myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) or MDS/MPN or cytogenetics & molecular features (intermediate and adverse) 2. CR2 or CR3 at transplantation * No HLA-matched sibling and unrelated donor (HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1) * Acceptable organ function defined as serum creatinine \< 2 mg/dl, unless considered due to leukemia and serum bilirubin \< 3 mg/dl, unless considered due to leukemia * Written informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Active uncontrolled infections * Corrected pulmonary diffusion capacity of \<40% * Cardiac ejection fraction of \<35% * ECOG performance status :2, 3, 4 * Active central nervous system involvement of disease * Serological evidence of infection with HIV * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Patient who are not suitable for the trial in accordance with principal investigator's decision

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survivalannually through 3 yearsOverall survival is defined as the time interval between date of enrollment and death from any cause or for surviving patients, to last follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Graft failure56 daysdefined as failure to achieve a neutrophil count greater than 500/mm\^3 for 3 consecutive days at any time after transplantation.
Secondary Graft failure100 daysdefined as the development of an absolute neutrophil count less than 500/mm\^3 after achievement of initial engraftment in the absence of recurrent disease.
Platelet recovery100 days and 180 daysdefined as the first day of a sustained platelet count greater than 20,000/mm\^3 without platelet transfusions in preceding 7 days. The first day of the sustained platelet count will be designated the day of platelet engraftment.
Donor cell engraftment56 daysDonor cell engraftment is defined as donor chimerism greater than or equal 5% on Day 56 after transplantation. Chimerism may be evaluated in whole blood or blood cell fractions, including cluster of differentiation (CD) 3 and CD33 or CD15 fractions. The actual measurement dates may be within +/- 7 days of the above recommended time points.
Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD)every 3 months through 3 yearsThe cumulative incidence of aGVHD (grade II-IV and III-IV) will be determined. The time to onset of aGVHD will be recorded, as well as the maximum grade achieved.
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD)every 3 months through 3 yearsThe cumulative incidence of cGVHD will be determined. Data will be collected directly from providers and chart review according to the recommendations of the NIH Consensus Conference. The NIH global severity scores of mild, moderate, and severe cGVHD will be assessed.
Disease free survivalannually through year 3defined as the time interval from date of enrollment and time to relapse/progression, to death or to last follow-up
Neutrophil recovery56 daysdefined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to 500/mm\^3 for three consecutive measurements on three difference days. The first of the 3 days will be designated the day of neutrophil recovery.
Infectionannually through year 3All grade 2 and 3 infections will be reported. Grade 1 cytomegalovirus infections through Day 56 will also be reported.
WT1 MRD assessmentbefore and 1 month after transplantation, then every 3 months through 3 yearsWT1 MRD assessment
BAALC MRD assessmentbefore and 1 month after transplantation, then every 3 months through 3 yearsBAALC MRD assessment
NGS-based MRD assessmentbefore and 1 month after transplantation, then every 3 months through 3 yearNGS-based MRD assessment
T cells reconstitutionbefore and 2 weeks and 1 month after transplantation, then every 3 months through 1 yearT cell subsets
NK cells reconstitutionbefore and 2 weeks and 1 month after transplantation, then every 3 months through 1 yearNK cell subsets
B cells reconstitutionbefore and 2 weeks and 1 month after transplantation, then every 3 months through 1 yearB cells
Non-relapse mortalityannually through year 3The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality will be estimated at Days 100, 180, and at 1 and 2 years after transplantation. An event for this endpoint is death without evidence of disease progression or recurrence

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026