Skip to content

Estimating Apnea Phenotypes From Polysomnography: Oxygen

Estimating Apnea Phenotypes From Routine Polysomnography: Application to Oxygen Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01751971
Acronym
PSGtraits-O2
Enrollment
47
Registered
2012-12-18
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2016-07-31
Last updated
2018-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sleep Apnea

Brief summary

This study seeks to employ advanced methods to estimate the individual factors contributing to sleep apnea from standard recordings made during routine clinical sleep studies. This study focuses on breathing control or loop gain as one of the factors contributing to sleep apnea. Increased levels of oxygen in the air is known to make breathing more stable by lowering loop gain. Here, our goal is to use a new method capable of detecting a reduction in loop gain with oxygen. The investigators also aim to test whether a high loop gain measured at baseline/placebo predicts a greater improvement in sleep apnea with oxygen therapy.

Detailed description

In a single-blinded randomized crossover study, inspired oxygen/air (40%/21%) is delivered on two separate nights. Loop gain is measured from routine polysomnography using a novel mathematical method. A value of loop gain \>1 reflects unstable breathing, and a value less than but approaching 1 denotes a system more prone to oscillate. Loop gain is measured as the changes in ventilatory drive/effort that arises subsequent to changes in ventilation (e.g. due to obstructive apnea). A simple chemoreflex model (gain, time constant, delay) is fit to surrogate ventilation data (derived from airflow) during sleep. The best model is one that best matches the elevated ventilatory drive (measured as ventilation in the absence of airflow obstruction) based on the prior apneic/hypopneic fall in ventilation. Loop gain is calculated from this model. We aim to use loop gain measured on and off oxygen to determine whether a strong response (reduction in apnea severity) can be predicted by a higher loop gain (in the sham arm) using our method. We also assessed whether assessing upper airway anatomy/collapsibility, dilator muscle responsiveness, and the arousal threshold helped to predict responses to treatment.

Interventions

DRUGInspired oxygen (40%)

Supplemental oxygen at 40% inspired via venturi mask (15 L/min). Equivalent to 5 L/min via nasal cannula.

OTHERSham

Medical air with 21% oxygen via venturi mask (15 L/min).

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
American Heart Association
CollaboratorOTHER
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants were not informed whether they were breathing supplemental inspired oxygen or sham (air) on the study night. Technicians and investigators performing the study were not masked in order to carefully ensure delivery of treatment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Apnea/hypopnea index \>20 events per hour * Age 20-79 years

Exclusion criteria

* COPD with desaturation (resting SpO2\<96%) * Use of respiratory stimulants or depressants * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Apnea-hypopnea Index1 nightApnea-hypopnea index (AHI) will be compared between oxygen and sham nights. Hypopneas are based on 30% reduction in airflow (no desaturation or arousal criteria). AHI data are exclusive to non-REM supine sleep. The results presented here are for the AHI at each intervention (per intervention) regardless of the sequence (preferred clinicaltrials.gov format). Please note, however, that the a priori outcome measure was the reduction in AHI with oxygen as a percent of sham values, i.e. (AHI on sham - AHI on oxygen)/(AHI on sham) % (a comparison with greater statistical power), compared between patient subgroups (see Statistical Analysis section). Subgroups were defined a priori as higher (\>=0.7) versus lower loop gain (\<0.7), but tests were also performed in subgroups defined by favorable versus unfavorable pathophysiology.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of EEG Arousals (Events Per Hour)1 nightFrequency of scored EEG arousals per hour of non-REM sleep. Note: Our objective was to describe changes in secondary outcomes within phenotypic subgroups. Overall effects (unselected patients / ignoring phenotypic subgroups) are first presented below, followed by effects in favorable vs. unfavorable subgroups.
Overnight Change in Systolic Blood Pressure1 nightThe change in systolic blood pressure overnight. Two supine oscillometric measurements of blood pressure are made: just prior to lights out (evening), and after lights on (morning).
Overnight Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure1 nightThe change in diastolic blood pressure overnight. Two supine oscillometric measurements of blood pressure are made: just prior to lights out (evening), and after lights on (morning).
Subjective Sleep Quality (Oxygen vs Sham)1 nightBetter(+1)/Same(0)/Worse(-1) on oxygen vs sham, i.e. a relative comparison between arms. When subjects had completed the entire study, they were asked to compare subjectively their sleep quality on the first versus second study.
Subjective Sleepiness/Alertness (Stanford Sleepiness Scale)1 nightAssessed in the morning after the single night of treatment. Minimum score: 1 (alert), maximum score: 7 (not alert).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Oxygen First
Participants participate in inspired oxygen arm (40% oxygen) first, then the air night (21% oxygen) second Inspired oxygen (40%): Supplemental oxygen at approximately 40% e.g. via Pink venturi mask
22
Air First
Participants participate in the air night (sham) first, then the oxygen night second. Sham: Medical air with 21% oxygen e.g. via Pink venturi mask
25
Total47

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOxygen FirstAir FirstTotal
Age, Continuous56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants10 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants15 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 460 / 45
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 460 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 460 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Apnea-hypopnea Index

Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) will be compared between oxygen and sham nights. Hypopneas are based on 30% reduction in airflow (no desaturation or arousal criteria). AHI data are exclusive to non-REM supine sleep. The results presented here are for the AHI at each intervention (per intervention) regardless of the sequence (preferred clinicaltrials.gov format). Please note, however, that the a priori outcome measure was the reduction in AHI with oxygen as a percent of sham values, i.e. (AHI on sham - AHI on oxygen)/(AHI on sham) % (a comparison with greater statistical power), compared between patient subgroups (see Statistical Analysis section). Subgroups were defined a priori as higher (\>=0.7) versus lower loop gain (\<0.7), but tests were also performed in subgroups defined by favorable versus unfavorable pathophysiology.

Time frame: 1 night

Population: Patients with AHI\>20

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Inspired OxygenApnea-hypopnea IndexPatients with high loop gain (LG1)48.5 events/hourStandard Error 6.4
Inspired OxygenApnea-hypopnea IndexPatients with favorable pathophysiology22.5 events/hourStandard Error 4.3
Inspired OxygenApnea-hypopnea IndexPatients with low loop gain (LG1)35.9 events/hourStandard Error 4.6
Inspired OxygenApnea-hypopnea IndexPatients with unfavorable pathophysiology51.9 events/hourStandard Error 4.1
Inspired OxygenApnea-hypopnea IndexAll patients40.5 events/hourStandard Error 3.8
ShamApnea-hypopnea IndexPatients with unfavorable pathophysiology63.2 events/hourStandard Error 5
ShamApnea-hypopnea IndexAll patients57.9 events/hourStandard Error 3.7
ShamApnea-hypopnea IndexPatients with high loop gain (LG1)74.3 events/hourStandard Error 6.1
ShamApnea-hypopnea IndexPatients with low loop gain (LG1)48.5 events/hourStandard Error 3.4
ShamApnea-hypopnea IndexPatients with favorable pathophysiology49.5 events/hourStandard Error 4.8
Comparison: Primary statistical comparison was the percent reduction in AHI----\[AHI(sham)-AHI(oxygen)\]/AHI(sham) %----between two phenotypic patient subgroups. Patient subgroups were defined by the loop gain (LG1) measured on the sham night as high or low (a priori cutoff LG1=0.7).p-value: 0.495% CI: [-16, 37.1]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Here we aimed to confirm that there was a difference between AHI on oxygen vs sham (overall, i.e. in unselected patients). This test, however was not part of our primary objective.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [10.7, 24.1]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The primary goal of the study was to identify a phenotypic subgroup of patients with sleep apnea that responds preferentially to oxygen (percent reduction in AHI----\[AHI(sham)-AHI(oxygen)\]/AHI(sham) %). We defined patient subgroups (favorable versus unfavorable) based on the four key phenotypic traits (loop gain, collapsibility, arousal threshold, muscle responses) measured on the sham night, with the use of multiple logistic regression and leave-one-out cross validation.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [21, 64.6]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Frequency of EEG Arousals (Events Per Hour)

Frequency of scored EEG arousals per hour of non-REM sleep. Note: Our objective was to describe changes in secondary outcomes within phenotypic subgroups. Overall effects (unselected patients / ignoring phenotypic subgroups) are first presented below, followed by effects in favorable vs. unfavorable subgroups.

Time frame: 1 night

Population: Patients with AHI\>20

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Inspired OxygenFrequency of EEG Arousals (Events Per Hour)All patients35.9 events/hrStandard Error 3.4
Inspired OxygenFrequency of EEG Arousals (Events Per Hour)Patients with favorable pathophysiology20.8 events/hrStandard Error 3
Inspired OxygenFrequency of EEG Arousals (Events Per Hour)Patients with unfavorable pathophysiology45.4 events/hrStandard Error 4.1
ShamFrequency of EEG Arousals (Events Per Hour)All patients50.3 events/hrStandard Error 3.7
ShamFrequency of EEG Arousals (Events Per Hour)Patients with favorable pathophysiology39.7 events/hrStandard Error 5.1
ShamFrequency of EEG Arousals (Events Per Hour)Patients with unfavorable pathophysiology57.0 events/hrStandard Error 4.6
Secondary

Overnight Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure

The change in diastolic blood pressure overnight. Two supine oscillometric measurements of blood pressure are made: just prior to lights out (evening), and after lights on (morning).

Time frame: 1 night

Population: Patients with AHI\>20

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Inspired OxygenOvernight Change in Diastolic Blood PressureAll patients0.9 mmHgStandard Error 0.9
Inspired OxygenOvernight Change in Diastolic Blood PressurePatients with favorable pathophysiology-0.7 mmHgStandard Error 1.2
Inspired OxygenOvernight Change in Diastolic Blood PressurePatients with unfavorable pathophysiology2.0 mmHgStandard Error 1.2
ShamOvernight Change in Diastolic Blood PressureAll patients4.1 mmHgStandard Error 1.5
ShamOvernight Change in Diastolic Blood PressurePatients with favorable pathophysiology6.4 mmHgStandard Error 2.3
ShamOvernight Change in Diastolic Blood PressurePatients with unfavorable pathophysiology2.5 mmHgStandard Error 2
Secondary

Overnight Change in Systolic Blood Pressure

The change in systolic blood pressure overnight. Two supine oscillometric measurements of blood pressure are made: just prior to lights out (evening), and after lights on (morning).

Time frame: 1 night

Population: Patients with AHI\>20

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Inspired OxygenOvernight Change in Systolic Blood PressureAll patients-0.8 mmHgStandard Error 1.4
Inspired OxygenOvernight Change in Systolic Blood PressurePatients with favorable pathophysiology-2.8 mmHgStandard Error 1.9
Inspired OxygenOvernight Change in Systolic Blood PressurePatients with unfavorable pathophysiology0.5 mmHgStandard Error 1.9
ShamOvernight Change in Systolic Blood PressureAll patients3.0 mmHgStandard Error 1.9
ShamOvernight Change in Systolic Blood PressurePatients with favorable pathophysiology3.4 mmHgStandard Error 2.9
ShamOvernight Change in Systolic Blood PressurePatients with unfavorable pathophysiology2.8 mmHgStandard Error 2.5
Secondary

Subjective Sleepiness/Alertness (Stanford Sleepiness Scale)

Assessed in the morning after the single night of treatment. Minimum score: 1 (alert), maximum score: 7 (not alert).

Time frame: 1 night

Population: Patients with AHI\>20

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Inspired OxygenSubjective Sleepiness/Alertness (Stanford Sleepiness Scale)All patients2.13 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Inspired OxygenSubjective Sleepiness/Alertness (Stanford Sleepiness Scale)Patients with favorable pathophysiology2.14 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Inspired OxygenSubjective Sleepiness/Alertness (Stanford Sleepiness Scale)Patients with unfavorable pathophysiology2.13 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
ShamSubjective Sleepiness/Alertness (Stanford Sleepiness Scale)All patients2.03 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
ShamSubjective Sleepiness/Alertness (Stanford Sleepiness Scale)Patients with favorable pathophysiology2.11 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
ShamSubjective Sleepiness/Alertness (Stanford Sleepiness Scale)Patients with unfavorable pathophysiology1.99 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Secondary

Subjective Sleep Quality (Oxygen vs Sham)

Better(+1)/Same(0)/Worse(-1) on oxygen vs sham, i.e. a relative comparison between arms. When subjects had completed the entire study, they were asked to compare subjectively their sleep quality on the first versus second study.

Time frame: 1 night

Population: Patients with AHI\>20. One patient, whose treatment and sham nights were separated by an extended duration (due to scheduling), did not provide data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Inspired OxygenSubjective Sleep Quality (Oxygen vs Sham)All patients0.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.13
Inspired OxygenSubjective Sleep Quality (Oxygen vs Sham)Patients with favorable pathophysiology0.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Inspired OxygenSubjective Sleep Quality (Oxygen vs Sham)Patients with unfavorable pathophysiology0.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026