Skip to content

Outcome Analysis for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Navigation

Outcome Analysis for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Navigation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01751841
Enrollment
200
Registered
2012-12-18
Start date
2012-05-01
Completion date
2023-10-31
Last updated
2024-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Disc Disease

Brief summary

Prospective/Retrospective data analysis, chart reviews and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive spine surgery

Detailed description

STUDY RATIONALE AND PRIMARY OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS To assess the clinical and radiographic outcome of spinal fusion procedures using Silicate-Substituted Calcium Phosphate (Si-CaP), a newer-generation of synthetic ceramics designed to maximize osteoinduction and osteoconduction. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Study PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Providing compelling evidence for the efficacy of Si-CaP in terms of resulting in satisfactory fusion. SUMMARY OF METHODS A prospectively collected database will be reviewed retrospectively, to retrieve data of 200 patients who have undergone different spinal fusion procedures using Silicate-Substituted Calcium Phosphate (Si-CaP). An average follow up duration of at least 12 months will be considered. Clinical outcomes will be assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Pre-operative scores will be compared to the latest follow-up scores. A board certified Neuro-radiologist will assess the fusion rate. Fusion will be determined by the presence of bony bridging on 2 consecutive sections in at least 2 planes on computed tomographic imaging. SECONDARY ENDPOINTS AND EXPECTED RESULTS The purpose of this study is to evaluate the level of clinical and radiographic improvement in patients implanted with Silicate-Substituted Calcium Phosphate (Si-CaP) as a bone graft substitute material for spinal fusions. More comprehensive long term studies will be able to provide compelling evidence for the efficacy of Si-CaP in terms of resulting in satisfactory fusion. They can more strongly support the previously published data implying that Si-CaP can be utilized as an alternative to autogenous bone graft in spinal arthrodesis procedures.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Patients with different spinal fusion procedures (including axial lumbar interbody fusion, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, extreme lateral interbody fusion, posterior cervical fusion, and anterior discectomy and fusion using Silicate-Substituted Calcium Phosphate as a bone graft substitute.

Exclusion criteria

\- Utilization of any other bone extenders in addition to Si-CaP as a bone graft substitute.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analog scale (VAS)Up to 2 yearsPre-operative pain scores will be compared to the latest follow-up pain scores.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fusion on CT imaging or flexion-extension radiographs.Up to 2 yearsA board certified Neuro-radiologist will assess the fusion rate.Fusion will be determined by the presence of bony bridging on 2 consecutive sections in at least 2 planes on computed tomographic imaging.
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)Up to 2 yearsPre-operative scores will be compared to the latest follow-up scores.
Neck Disability Index (NDI)Up to 2 yearsPre-operative scores will be compared to the latest follow-up scores.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026