Skip to content

Study of Luspatercept for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) (MK-6143-001)

A Phase 2, Open Label, Ascending Dose Study of ACE-536 for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients With Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01749514
Enrollment
116
Registered
2012-12-13
Start date
2013-01-21
Completion date
2018-10-22
Last updated
2024-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia

Keywords

Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of luspatercept (MK-6143, formerly called ACE-536) on anemia in patients with low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). There is no primary hypothesis in this study.

Interventions

DRUGLuspatercept

Participants receive luspatercept up to 1.75mg/kg subcutaneously (SC) every 3 weeks for up to 5 cycles (each cycle length = 21 days).

Sponsors

Acceleron Pharma, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Documented diagnosis of idiopathic/de novo myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or non-proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), according to WHO criteria (white blood count, 13,000/uL), that meets International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) classification of low or intermediate-1 risk disease as determined by microscopic and standard cytogenetic analyses of the bone marrow and peripheral complete blood count (CBC) obtained during screening * Anemia defined as: * Mean hemoglobin concentration \<10.0 g/dL of 2 measurements (one performed within one day prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 and the other performed 7-28 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, not influenced by red blood cell (RBC) transfusion within 7 days of measurement for non-transfusion dependent patients (defined as having received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1), or Transfusion dependent, defined as having received ≥4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 * Serum erythropoietin levels and prior erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment: * Dose escalation cohorts and expansion cohort 1 patients: Serum erythropoietin level \>500 U/L, OR, if ≤500 U/L, patient is non-responsive, refractory, or intolerant to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), or ESAs are contraindicated or unavailable * Expansion cohort 2 patients: If patient is RS+ (defined as having ≥15% ring sideroblasts in the bone marrow), no prior ESA treatment and serum erythropoietin level ≤ 200 U/L. If a patient is RS- (defined as having \<15% ring sideroblasts in the bone marrow), prior ESA treatment and any serum erythropoietin level is allowed * No alternative treatment options, per applicable MDS guidelines, are available and/or appropriate for the patient, at the discretion of the investigator * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2 (if related to anemia). * Adequate renal (creatinine ≤2 x upper limit of normal \[ULN\]) and hepatic (total bilirubin \<2 x ULN and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \<3 x ULN) function * Adequate transferrin saturation (≥15%), ferritin (≥ 50 µg/L), folate (≥4.5 nmol/L \[≥2.0 µg/L\]) and vitamin B12 (≥148 pmol/L \[≥ 200 pg/mL\]) during screening (supplementation and retest during screening is acceptable) * Females of child bearing potential (defined as sexually mature women who have not undergone hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, or are not naturally postmenopausal ≥24 consecutive months) must have negative urine or blood pregnancy test prior to enrollment and use adequate birth control methods (abstinence, oral contraceptives, barrier method with spermicide, or surgical sterilization) during study participation and for 12 weeks following the last dose of luspatercept. Males must agree to use a latex condom during any sexual contact with females of child-bearing potential while participating in the study and for 12 weeks following the last dose of luspatercept, even if he has undergone a successful vasectomy. Patients must be counseled concerning measures to be used to prevent pregnancy and potential toxicities prior to the first dose of luspatercept * Patients are able to adhere to the study visit schedule, understand and comply with all protocol requirements * Patients understand and are able to provide written informed consent Key

Exclusion criteria

* Prior treatment with azacitidine or decitabine * Treatment within 28 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 with: * Erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) * Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) * Lenalidomide * Iron chelation therapy if initiated within 56 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 * Treatment with another investigational drug or device, or approved therapy for investigational use ≤28 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, or if the half-life of the previous product is known, within 5 times the half-life prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, whichever is longer * Major surgery within 28 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1. Patients must have completely recovered from any previous surgery prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 * Platelet count \<30 x 109/L. * Any active infection requiring parenteral antibiotic therapy within 28 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 or oral antibiotics within 14 days of Cycle 1 Day 1 * History of stroke, deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or arterial embolism within 6 months prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 * Known positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), active infectious hepatitis B (HBV) or active infectious hepatitis C (HCV) * Any malignancy other than MDS which has not been in remission and/or has required systemic therapy including radiation, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy or surgery, within the last year prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 * Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥ 150 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥ 100 mm Hg * Pregnant or lactating females * History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or hypersensitivity to recombinant proteins or excipients in the investigational drug * Any other condition not specifically noted above which, in the judgment of the investigator, would preclude the patient from participating in the study * Transfusion event within 7 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 * Prior treatment with sotatercept (MK-7962, formerly called ACE-011) or luspatercept. * Secondary MDS

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Low Transfusion Burden (LTB) Participants With Modified Erythroid Response (mHI-E)Any consecutive 2 weeks during the study (up to approximately 75 weeks)The mHI-E for LTB participants was defined as a hemoglobin increase of ≥1.5 g/dL from baseline for ≥14 days or rolling 2 weeks (in the absence of red blood cell \[RBC\] transfusions). Hemoglobin measurements within 7 days following RBC transfusion were excluded from analysis. LTB participants were those who received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline. Rolling 2 weeks was defined as any consecutive 2 weeks during the study. The percentage of LTB participants with mHI-E were reported.
Percentage of High Transfusion Burden (HTB) Participants With mHI-EAny consecutive 8 weeks during the study (up to approximately 75 weeks)The mHI-E for HTB participants was defined as a ≥4 units or ≥50% reduction in RBC transfusion burden during any rolling 8-week window compared to baseline. HTB participants were those who required ≥4 units of RBC transfusions within 8 weeks prior to baseline. Rolling 8 weeks was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. The percentage of HTB participants with mHI-E were reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response CriteriaAny consecutive 8 Weeks during the study treatment (up to approximately 75 weeks)Per IWG 2006 response criteria, rate of HI-E is defined as the percentage of participants for whom the mean of all hemoglobin value from baseline during any rolling 8-week increased ≥1.5 g/dL in the absence of transfusion for LTB participants, or a reduction by ≥4 units of RBCs transfusion over any rolling 8-week window for HTB patients. LTB participants were those who received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline. HTB participants were those who required ≥4 units of RBC transfusions within 8 weeks prior to baseline. Rolling 8 weeks was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study.
Rate of Platelet Response (HI-P) Per IWG 2006 CriteriaAny consecutive 8 Weeks during the study treatment (up to approximately 75 weeks)Per IWG 2006 response criteria, HI-P was defined for participants with baseline value ≥20 x 10\^9/L as the platelet increase in any rolling 8 weeks ≥30 x 10\^9 and for participants with baseline value \<20 x 10\^9/L as the platelet increase in any rolling 8 weeks \>20 x 10\^9/L with increase of at least 100%. The rolling 8-week was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. The percentage of participants with HI-P were reported.
Rate of Neutrophil Response (HI-N) Per IWG 2006 CriteriaAny consecutive 8 Weeks during the study treatment (up to approximately 75 weeks)Per IWG 2006 response criteria, HI-N was defined as the neutrophil increase in any rolling 8 weeks is at last 100% and an absolute increase \> 0.5 x 10\^9/L. The rolling 8-week was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. The percentage of participants with HI-N response were reported.
Duration of HI-E Per IWG 2006 Response Criteriaup to approximately 75 weeksPer IWG 2006 response criteria, duration of HI-E response was defined as the time from the first day of the first rolling 8-week interval of showing response to the last day of the last consecutive rolling 8-week interval of showing response. HI-E response for LTB participants was defined as hemoglobin increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL during any rolling 8-week window and for HTB HI-E was defined as RBC transfusion reduction ≥4 units during any rolling 8 weeks. LTB participants were those who received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline. HTB participants were those who required ≥4 units of RBC transfusions within 8 weeks prior to baseline. The rolling 8-week was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study.
Time to HI-E Per IWG 2006 Response CriteriaAny consecutive 8 weeks during the study (up to approximately 75 weeks)Per IWG 2006 response criteria, the time to HI-E response was defined as the first date of the rolling 8-week interval of showing response minus first dose date plus 1. HI-E response for LTB participants was defined as hemoglobin increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL during any rolling 8 weeks window and for HTB HI-E was defined as RBC transfusion reduction ≥4 units during any rolling 8 weeks. LTB participants were those who received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline. HTB participants were those who required ≥4 units of RBC transfusions within 8 weeks prior to baseline. The rolling 8-week was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study.
Mean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113Frequency of RBC transfusion was defined as the total number of RBC transfusions received. Per protocol, the mean change from baseline to Day 113 in frequency of RBC transfusion was reported in the HTB participants (those who required ≥4 units of RBC transfusions within 8 weeks prior to baseline).
Rate of RBC Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)Up to approximately 16 weeksRate of RBC-TI was defined as percentage of participants with ≥2 units of RBC transfusions at baseline who experienced transfusion independence which was defined as ≥8 weeks without a transfusion while on treatment. Per protocol, rate of RBC-TI was reported in HTB participants (those who required ≥4 units of RBC transfusions within 8 weeks prior to baseline).
Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of LuspaterceptCycle 1 Day 1: Predose, Cycle 1: Days 8, 11, 15: Postdose; Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 8, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, and Cycle 5 Days 8, 15: Postdose (each cycle length = 21 days)Blood samples were collected at specified intervals for the determination of Tmax. Tmax was defined as time to the maximum concentration of luspatercept reached. Tmax was based on non-compartmental analysis and a mean Tmax value was presented.
Terminal Half-Life (t ½) of LuspaterceptCycle 1 Day 1: Predose, Cycle 1: Days 8, 11, 15: Postdose; Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 8, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, and Cycle 5 Days 8, 15: Postdose (each cycle length = 21 days)Blood samples were collected at specified intervals for the determination of t½. t½ was defined as the time required to divide the luspatercept plasma concentration by two after reaching pseudo-equilibrium, following a single dose of luspatercept. t½ was based on non-compartmental analysis and a mean t1/2 value was presented.
Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of LuspaterceptCycle 1 Day 1: Predose, Cycle 1: Days 8, 11, 15: Postdose; Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 8, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, and Cycle 5 Days 8, 15: Postdose (each cycle length = 21 days)Blood samples were collected at specified intervals for the determination of Cmax. Cmax was defined as the maximum concentration of luspatercept reached. Cmax was based on non-compartmental analysis and a mean Cmax value was presented.
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve of Luspatercept From Time 0 to Day 21 (AUC0-21)Cycle 1 Day 1: Predose, Cycle 1 Days 8, 11, 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1: Postdose (each cycle length = 21 days)Blood samples were collected at specified intervals for the determination of AUC0-21. AUC0-21 was defined as the area under the concentration-time curve of luspatercept from time zero to Study Day 21. AUC0-21 was based on non-compartmental analysis and a mean AUC0-21 value was presented.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum IronBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum iron concentration. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC)Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine TIBC. The percentage change from baseline in TIBC was reported.
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)Up to approximately 24 weeksAn adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug whether or not it is considered related to the study drug. The number of participants who experienced an AE were reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Soluble Transferrin ReceptorBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine soluble transferrin receptor concentration. The percentage change from baseline in concentration of soluble transferrin receptor was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum FerritinBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum ferritin concentration. The percentage change from baseline in concentration of serum ferritin was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Non-Transferrin Bound Iron (NTBI)Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine concentration of NTBI. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum HepcidinBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine soluble hepcidin concentration. The percentage change from baseline in concentration of soluble hepcidin was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum ErythropoietinBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum erythropoietin concentration. The percentage change from baseline in concentration of serum erythropoietin was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Reticulocyte CountBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine reticulocyte count. The percentage change from baseline in mean reticulocyte count was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Direct Bilirubin LevelBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum direct bilirubin concentration. The percentage change from baseline in mean concentration direct bilirubin was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Bilirubin LevelBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine total bilirubin concentration. The percentage change from baseline in mean concentration total bilirubin was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Lactate Dehydrogenase LevelBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum lactate dehydrogenase level. The percentage change from baseline in mean concentration lactate dehydrogenase level was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Nucleated RBC (nRBC)Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine concentration of nRBC. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum BSAP concentration. The percentage change from baseline in concentration BSAP was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Cross-Linked C-Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX)Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum CTX. The percentage change from baseline in concentration of CTX was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of TransferrinBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine concentration of transferrin. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due To an AEUp to approximately 12 weeksAn adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug whether or not it is considered related to the study drug. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE were reported.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 116 participants were enrolled and received treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)
Participants received luspatercept 0.125mg/kg as a subcutaneous (SC) injection every 3 weeks (Q3W) on Day 1 of each cycle for up to 5 cycles (each cycle length = 21 days).
3
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)
Participants received luspatercept titrated up to 0.25mg/kg via Fibonacci scheme, SC injection Q3W on Day 1 of each cycle for up to 5 cycles (each cycle length = 21 days).
3
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)
Participants received luspatercept titrated up to 0.50mg/kg via Fibonacci scheme, SC injection Q3W on Day 1 of each cycle for up to 5 cycles (each cycle length = 21 days).
3
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)
Participants received luspatercept titrated up to 0.75mg/kg via Fibonacci scheme, SC injection Q3W on Day 1 of each cycle for up to 5 cycles (each cycle length = 21 days).
6
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)
Participants received luspatercept titrated up to 1.00mg/kg via Fibonacci scheme, SC injection Q3W on Day 1 of each cycle for up to 5 cycles (each cycle length = 21 days).
3
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)
Participants received luspatercept titrated up to 1.33mg/kg via Fibonacci scheme, SC injection Q3W on Day 1 of each cycle for up to 5 cycles (each cycle length = 21 days).
6
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)
Participants received luspatercept titrated up to 1.75mg/kg via Fibonacci scheme, SC injection Q3W on Day 1 of each cycle for up to 5 cycles (each cycle length = 21 days).
3
Expansion Cohort
Participants received an initial dose of luspatercept 1.0mg/kg SC on Day 1 of the Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 21 days). For each subsequent cycle (up to 5 cycles), the dose was titrated via Fibonacci scheme up to a maximum dose of 1.75mg/kg based on the safety review team (SRT) recommendations.
89
Total116

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up00000001
Overall StudyNot Reported00000005
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject00000101

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLuspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)TotalExpansion CohortLuspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)
Age, Continuous59.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.8
70.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.1
70.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
71.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
63.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.6
68.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
73.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
64.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants3 Participants105 Participants80 Participants3 Participants5 Participants3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants11 Participants9 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Hemoglobin level8.91 g/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.81
10.30 g/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.98
8.81 g/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.98
8.79 g/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.01
9.53 g/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.06
8.42 g/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.58
8.37 g/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
8.55 g/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.75
8.83 g/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.31
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants3 Participants116 Participants89 Participants3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants3 Participants44 Participants30 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants72 Participants59 Participants1 Participants5 Participants3 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Transfusion Status
HTB
2 Participants2 Participants51 Participants31 Participants1 Participants6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Transfusion Status
LTB
1 Participants1 Participants65 Participants58 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30 / 30 / 30 / 60 / 30 / 60 / 30 / 89
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 32 / 33 / 35 / 63 / 33 / 62 / 362 / 89
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 30 / 30 / 30 / 61 / 33 / 61 / 314 / 89

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of High Transfusion Burden (HTB) Participants With mHI-E

The mHI-E for HTB participants was defined as a ≥4 units or ≥50% reduction in RBC transfusion burden during any rolling 8-week window compared to baseline. HTB participants were those who required ≥4 units of RBC transfusions within 8 weeks prior to baseline. Rolling 8 weeks was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. The percentage of HTB participants with mHI-E were reported.

Time frame: Any consecutive 8 weeks during the study (up to approximately 75 weeks)

Population: All enrolled HTB participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and who required ≥4 units of RBC transfusions within 8 weeks prior to baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Percentage of High Transfusion Burden (HTB) Participants With mHI-E50.0 Percentage of Participants
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Percentage of High Transfusion Burden (HTB) Participants With mHI-E50.0 Percentage of Participants
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Percentage of High Transfusion Burden (HTB) Participants With mHI-E33.3 Percentage of Participants
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Percentage of High Transfusion Burden (HTB) Participants With mHI-E33.3 Percentage of Participants
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Percentage of High Transfusion Burden (HTB) Participants With mHI-E33.3 Percentage of Participants
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Percentage of High Transfusion Burden (HTB) Participants With mHI-E50.0 Percentage of Participants
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Percentage of High Transfusion Burden (HTB) Participants With mHI-E100 Percentage of Participants
Expansion CohortPercentage of High Transfusion Burden (HTB) Participants With mHI-E54.8 Percentage of Participants
Primary

Percentage of Low Transfusion Burden (LTB) Participants With Modified Erythroid Response (mHI-E)

The mHI-E for LTB participants was defined as a hemoglobin increase of ≥1.5 g/dL from baseline for ≥14 days or rolling 2 weeks (in the absence of red blood cell \[RBC\] transfusions). Hemoglobin measurements within 7 days following RBC transfusion were excluded from analysis. LTB participants were those who received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline. Rolling 2 weeks was defined as any consecutive 2 weeks during the study. The percentage of LTB participants with mHI-E were reported.

Time frame: Any consecutive 2 weeks during the study (up to approximately 75 weeks)

Population: All enrolled LTB participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Percentage of Low Transfusion Burden (LTB) Participants With Modified Erythroid Response (mHI-E)0 Percentage of participants
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Percentage of Low Transfusion Burden (LTB) Participants With Modified Erythroid Response (mHI-E)0 Percentage of participants
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Percentage of Low Transfusion Burden (LTB) Participants With Modified Erythroid Response (mHI-E)66.7 Percentage of participants
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Percentage of Low Transfusion Burden (LTB) Participants With Modified Erythroid Response (mHI-E)100 Percentage of participants
Expansion CohortPercentage of Low Transfusion Burden (LTB) Participants With Modified Erythroid Response (mHI-E)69.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve of Luspatercept From Time 0 to Day 21 (AUC0-21)

Blood samples were collected at specified intervals for the determination of AUC0-21. AUC0-21 was defined as the area under the concentration-time curve of luspatercept from time zero to Study Day 21. AUC0-21 was based on non-compartmental analysis and a mean AUC0-21 value was presented.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: Predose, Cycle 1 Days 8, 11, 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1: Postdose (each cycle length = 21 days)

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had sufficient pharmacokinetic samples collected and assayed.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve of Luspatercept From Time 0 to Day 21 (AUC0-21)9.29 day*ug/mGeometric Coefficient of Variation 32.16
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve of Luspatercept From Time 0 to Day 21 (AUC0-21)12.56 day*ug/mGeometric Coefficient of Variation 94.99
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve of Luspatercept From Time 0 to Day 21 (AUC0-21)36.90 day*ug/mGeometric Coefficient of Variation 4.19
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve of Luspatercept From Time 0 to Day 21 (AUC0-21)51.82 day*ug/mGeometric Coefficient of Variation 35.93
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve of Luspatercept From Time 0 to Day 21 (AUC0-21)62.46 day*ug/mGeometric Coefficient of Variation 25.2
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve of Luspatercept From Time 0 to Day 21 (AUC0-21)112.56 day*ug/mGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve of Luspatercept From Time 0 to Day 21 (AUC0-21)137.56 day*ug/mGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1.13
Expansion CohortArea Under the Concentration-Time Curve of Luspatercept From Time 0 to Day 21 (AUC0-21)80.02 day*ug/mGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.77
Secondary

Duration of HI-E Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria

Per IWG 2006 response criteria, duration of HI-E response was defined as the time from the first day of the first rolling 8-week interval of showing response to the last day of the last consecutive rolling 8-week interval of showing response. HI-E response for LTB participants was defined as hemoglobin increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL during any rolling 8-week window and for HTB HI-E was defined as RBC transfusion reduction ≥4 units during any rolling 8 weeks. LTB participants were those who received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline. HTB participants were those who required ≥4 units of RBC transfusions within 8 weeks prior to baseline. The rolling 8-week was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study.

Time frame: up to approximately 75 weeks

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept. Per protocol, the participants with response were pooled into low and high dose groups to increase the accuracy of the analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Duration of HI-E Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria78 DaysStandard Deviation 7.8
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Duration of HI-E Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria88 DaysStandard Deviation 22.8
Secondary

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Luspatercept

Blood samples were collected at specified intervals for the determination of Cmax. Cmax was defined as the maximum concentration of luspatercept reached. Cmax was based on non-compartmental analysis and a mean Cmax value was presented.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: Predose, Cycle 1: Days 8, 11, 15: Postdose; Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 8, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, and Cycle 5 Days 8, 15: Postdose (each cycle length = 21 days)

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had sufficient pharmacokinetic samples collected and assayed.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Luspatercept0.64 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.88
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Luspatercept0.96 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 92.99
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Luspatercept2.33 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.16
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Luspatercept3.76 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.29
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Luspatercept4.35 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 12.87
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Luspatercept7.46 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.55
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Luspatercept9.66 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.52
Expansion CohortMaximum Concentration (Cmax) of Luspatercept5.73 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 26.93
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC Transfusions

Frequency of RBC transfusion was defined as the total number of RBC transfusions received. Per protocol, the mean change from baseline to Day 113 in frequency of RBC transfusion was reported in the HTB participants (those who required ≥4 units of RBC transfusions within 8 weeks prior to baseline).

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113

Population: All enrolled HTB participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and who required ≥4 units of RBC transfusions within 8 weeks prior to baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Mean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline2.50 Number of RBC transfusionsStandard Deviation 0.71
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Mean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline to Day 113-0.70 Number of RBC transfusionsStandard Deviation 0.71
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Mean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline2.50 Number of RBC transfusionsStandard Deviation 2.12
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Mean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline to Day 1130.11 Number of RBC transfusionsStandard Deviation 0.69
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Mean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline4.00 Number of RBC transfusionsStandard Deviation 0
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Mean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline to Day 1130.38 Number of RBC transfusionsStandard Deviation 2.08
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Mean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline2.00 Number of RBC transfusionsStandard Deviation 0
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Mean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline to Day 1130.40 Number of RBC transfusionsStandard Deviation 2.12
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Mean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline4.00 Number of RBC transfusionsStandard Deviation 1
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Mean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline to Day 113-0.31 Number of RBC transfusionsStandard Deviation 1.21
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Mean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline2.83 Number of RBC transfusionsStandard Deviation 0.75
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Mean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline to Day 113-0.36 Number of RBC transfusionsStandard Deviation 1.03
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Mean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline to Day 113-2.46 Number of RBC transfusions
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Mean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline3.00 Number of RBC transfusions
Expansion CohortMean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline3.06 Number of RBC transfusionsStandard Deviation 1.34
Expansion CohortMean Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Frequency of RBC TransfusionsBaseline to Day 113-0.85 Number of RBC transfusionsStandard Deviation 1.14
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due To an AE

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug whether or not it is considered related to the study drug. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE were reported.

Time frame: Up to approximately 12 weeks

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due To an AE0 Participants
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due To an AE0 Participants
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due To an AE0 Participants
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due To an AE0 Participants
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due To an AE0 Participants
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due To an AE0 Participants
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due To an AE0 Participants
Expansion CohortNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due To an AE5 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug whether or not it is considered related to the study drug. The number of participants who experienced an AE were reported.

Time frame: Up to approximately 24 weeks

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)1 Participants
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)2 Participants
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)3 Participants
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)5 Participants
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)3 Participants
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)4 Participants
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)2 Participants
Expansion CohortNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)75 Participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Non-Transferrin Bound Iron (NTBI)

Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine concentration of NTBI. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113

Population: No data were collected for the percent change from baseline to day 113 in concentration of NTBI.

Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum BSAP concentration. The percentage change from baseline in concentration BSAP was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for BSAP.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)-6.41 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.698
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)-36.70 Percent changeStandard Deviation 9.43
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)-24.60 Percent changeStandard Deviation 16.413
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)47.48 Percent changeStandard Deviation 42.431
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)14.15 Percent changeStandard Deviation 13.191
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)-6.43 Percent changeStandard Deviation 25.559
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)15.27 Percent change
Expansion CohortPercent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)8.31 Percent changeStandard Deviation 23.8
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Cross-Linked C-Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX)

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum CTX. The percentage change from baseline in concentration of CTX was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for CTX.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Cross-Linked C-Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX)-4.42 Percent change
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Cross-Linked C-Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX)16.26 Percent change
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Cross-Linked C-Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX)26.37 Percent changeStandard Deviation 24.669
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Cross-Linked C-Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX)15.94 Percent changeStandard Deviation 35.018
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Cross-Linked C-Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX)13.04 Percent changeStandard Deviation 62.513
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Cross-Linked C-Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX)-70.97 Percent change
Expansion CohortPercent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Cross-Linked C-Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX)22.66 Percent changeStandard Deviation 51.177
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Erythropoietin

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum erythropoietin concentration. The percentage change from baseline in concentration of serum erythropoietin was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for serum erythropoietin.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Erythropoietin144.48 Percent changeStandard Deviation 232.336
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Erythropoietin110.51 Percent changeStandard Deviation 85.751
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Erythropoietin122.85 Percent changeStandard Deviation 163.5
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Erythropoietin1.81 Percent changeStandard Deviation 48.208
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Erythropoietin749.10 Percent changeStandard Deviation 902
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Erythropoietin146.49 Percent changeStandard Deviation 160.087
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Erythropoietin29.07 Percent changeStandard Deviation 80.426
Expansion CohortPercent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Erythropoietin238.85 Percent changeStandard Deviation 974.226
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Ferritin

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum ferritin concentration. The percentage change from baseline in concentration of serum ferritin was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for serum ferritin.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Ferritin-19.55 Percent changeStandard Deviation 32.845
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Ferritin58.63 Percent changeStandard Deviation 24.342
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Ferritin74.31 Percent changeStandard Deviation 160.308
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Ferritin1.16 Percent changeStandard Deviation 23.487
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Ferritin19.38 Percent changeStandard Deviation 25.666
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Ferritin8.56 Percent changeStandard Deviation 41.532
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Ferritin-16.07 Percent changeStandard Deviation 27.172
Expansion CohortPercent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Ferritin-1.51 Percent changeStandard Deviation 46.269
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Hepcidin

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine soluble hepcidin concentration. The percentage change from baseline in concentration of soluble hepcidin was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for serum hepcidin.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Hepcidin-42.40 Percent changeStandard Deviation 5.907
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Hepcidin6.56 Percent changeStandard Deviation 35.74
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Hepcidin-14.55 Percent changeStandard Deviation 39.855
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Hepcidin-15.62 Percent changeStandard Deviation 20.814
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Hepcidin-5.54 Percent changeStandard Deviation 49.144
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Hepcidin65.41 Percent changeStandard Deviation 179.249
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Hepcidin-64.51 Percent change
Expansion CohortPercent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Hepcidin30.15 Percent changeStandard Deviation 143.118
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Serum Iron

Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum iron concentration. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113

Population: No data were collected for the percent change from baseline to day 113 in concentration of serum iron.

Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Soluble Transferrin Receptor

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine soluble transferrin receptor concentration. The percentage change from baseline in concentration of soluble transferrin receptor was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for soluble transferrin receptor.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Soluble Transferrin Receptor60.88 Percent changeStandard Deviation 76.427
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Soluble Transferrin Receptor-31.46 Percent changeStandard Deviation 5.135
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Soluble Transferrin Receptor-4.62 Percent changeStandard Deviation 6.527
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Soluble Transferrin Receptor36.35 Percent changeStandard Deviation 21.718
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Soluble Transferrin Receptor-17.11 Percent changeStandard Deviation 32.861
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Soluble Transferrin Receptor19.25 Percent changeStandard Deviation 7.793
Expansion CohortPercent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Soluble Transferrin Receptor35.35 Percent changeStandard Deviation 44.228
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Concentration of Transferrin

Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine concentration of transferrin. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113

Population: No data were collected for the percent change from baseline to day 113 in concentration of transferrin.

Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Direct Bilirubin Level

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum direct bilirubin concentration. The percentage change from baseline in mean concentration direct bilirubin was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for direct bilirubin.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Direct Bilirubin Level-18.45 Percent changeStandard Deviation 6.569
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Direct Bilirubin Level12.38 Percent changeStandard Deviation 38.465
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Direct Bilirubin Level2.33 Percent change
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Direct Bilirubin Level7.22 Percent changeStandard Deviation 20.592
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Direct Bilirubin Level-5.00 Percent change
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Direct Bilirubin Level-7.41 Percent changeStandard Deviation 12.83
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Direct Bilirubin Level6.78 Percent change
Expansion CohortPercent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Direct Bilirubin Level-0.50 Percent changeStandard Deviation 27.541
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Lactate Dehydrogenase Level

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum lactate dehydrogenase level. The percentage change from baseline in mean concentration lactate dehydrogenase level was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for lactate dehydrogenase.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Lactate Dehydrogenase Level13.09 Percent changeStandard Deviation 28.85
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Lactate Dehydrogenase Level-10.28 Percent changeStandard Deviation 6.589
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Lactate Dehydrogenase Level0.03 Percent changeStandard Deviation 32.694
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Lactate Dehydrogenase Level2.76 Percent changeStandard Deviation 7.848
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Lactate Dehydrogenase Level-15.20 Percent changeStandard Deviation 25.355
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Lactate Dehydrogenase Level-2.52 Percent changeStandard Deviation 18.669
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Lactate Dehydrogenase Level-11.91 Percent changeStandard Deviation 35.318
Expansion CohortPercent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Lactate Dehydrogenase Level20.58 Percent changeStandard Deviation 46.589
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Nucleated RBC (nRBC)

Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine concentration of nRBC. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113

Population: No data were collected for the percent change from baseline to day 113 in concentration of nRBC.

Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Reticulocyte Count

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine reticulocyte count. The percentage change from baseline in mean reticulocyte count was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for reticulocyte count.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Reticulocyte Count110.82 Percent changeStandard Deviation 127.489
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Reticulocyte Count8.10 Percent change
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Reticulocyte Count79.77 Percent changeStandard Deviation 45.816
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Reticulocyte Count28.29 Percent changeStandard Deviation 28.434
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Reticulocyte Count76.16 Percent changeStandard Deviation 54.003
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Reticulocyte Count0.45 Percent changeStandard Deviation 19.77
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Reticulocyte Count84.06 Percent changeStandard Deviation 108.298
Expansion CohortPercent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Reticulocyte Count41.37 Percent changeStandard Deviation 73.445
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Bilirubin Level

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine total bilirubin concentration. The percentage change from baseline in mean concentration total bilirubin was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for total bilirubin.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Bilirubin Level-25.41 Percent changeStandard Deviation 5.596
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Bilirubin Level4.32 Percent changeStandard Deviation 26.094
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Bilirubin Level47.43 Percent changeStandard Deviation 51.076
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Bilirubin Level4.02 Percent changeStandard Deviation 10.439
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Bilirubin Level-25.08 Percent changeStandard Deviation 17.24
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Bilirubin Level-25.84 Percent changeStandard Deviation 19.893
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Bilirubin Level10.68 Percent changeStandard Deviation 20.258
Expansion CohortPercent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Bilirubin Level13.26 Percent changeStandard Deviation 37.239
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC)

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine TIBC. The percentage change from baseline in TIBC was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 113

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for TIBC.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC)-1.49 Percent changeStandard Deviation 8.94
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC)1.61 Percent changeStandard Deviation 1.392
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC)-6.70 Percent changeStandard Deviation 6.05
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC)10.91 Percent changeStandard Deviation 11.806
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC)7.46 Percent changeStandard Deviation 11.727
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC)-12.27 Percent changeStandard Deviation 22.144
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Percent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC)-4.16 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.435
Expansion CohortPercent Change From Baseline to Day 113 in Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC)-2.40 Percent changeStandard Deviation 9.916
Secondary

Rate of Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria

Per IWG 2006 response criteria, rate of HI-E is defined as the percentage of participants for whom the mean of all hemoglobin value from baseline during any rolling 8-week increased ≥1.5 g/dL in the absence of transfusion for LTB participants, or a reduction by ≥4 units of RBCs transfusion over any rolling 8-week window for HTB patients. LTB participants were those who received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline. HTB participants were those who required ≥4 units of RBC transfusions within 8 weeks prior to baseline. Rolling 8 weeks was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study.

Time frame: Any consecutive 8 Weeks during the study treatment (up to approximately 75 weeks)

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Rate of Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria33.3 Percentage of participants
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Rate of Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria0 Percentage of participants
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Rate of Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria33.3 Percentage of participants
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Rate of Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria33.3 Percentage of participants
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Rate of Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria33.3 Percentage of participants
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Rate of Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria50.0 Percentage of participants
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Rate of Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria100 Percentage of participants
Expansion CohortRate of Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria53.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Rate of Neutrophil Response (HI-N) Per IWG 2006 Criteria

Per IWG 2006 response criteria, HI-N was defined as the neutrophil increase in any rolling 8 weeks is at last 100% and an absolute increase \> 0.5 x 10\^9/L. The rolling 8-week was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. The percentage of participants with HI-N response were reported.

Time frame: Any consecutive 8 Weeks during the study treatment (up to approximately 75 weeks)

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had baseline neutrophil count \<1.0×10\^9/L.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Rate of Neutrophil Response (HI-N) Per IWG 2006 Criteria0 Percentage of Participants
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Rate of Neutrophil Response (HI-N) Per IWG 2006 Criteria100 Percentage of Participants
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Rate of Neutrophil Response (HI-N) Per IWG 2006 Criteria0 Percentage of Participants
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Rate of Neutrophil Response (HI-N) Per IWG 2006 Criteria66.7 Percentage of Participants
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Rate of Neutrophil Response (HI-N) Per IWG 2006 Criteria100 Percentage of Participants
Expansion CohortRate of Neutrophil Response (HI-N) Per IWG 2006 Criteria25.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Rate of Platelet Response (HI-P) Per IWG 2006 Criteria

Per IWG 2006 response criteria, HI-P was defined for participants with baseline value ≥20 x 10\^9/L as the platelet increase in any rolling 8 weeks ≥30 x 10\^9 and for participants with baseline value \<20 x 10\^9/L as the platelet increase in any rolling 8 weeks \>20 x 10\^9/L with increase of at least 100%. The rolling 8-week was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. The percentage of participants with HI-P were reported.

Time frame: Any consecutive 8 Weeks during the study treatment (up to approximately 75 weeks)

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had baseline platelet count \<100x10\^9/L.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Rate of Platelet Response (HI-P) Per IWG 2006 Criteria0 Percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 0
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Rate of Platelet Response (HI-P) Per IWG 2006 Criteria0 Percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 0
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Rate of Platelet Response (HI-P) Per IWG 2006 Criteria0 Percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 0
Expansion CohortRate of Platelet Response (HI-P) Per IWG 2006 Criteria23.5 Percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 6.8
Secondary

Rate of RBC Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)

Rate of RBC-TI was defined as percentage of participants with ≥2 units of RBC transfusions at baseline who experienced transfusion independence which was defined as ≥8 weeks without a transfusion while on treatment. Per protocol, rate of RBC-TI was reported in HTB participants (those who required ≥4 units of RBC transfusions within 8 weeks prior to baseline).

Time frame: Up to approximately 16 weeks

Population: All enrolled HTB participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had ≥2 units of RBC transfusions at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Rate of RBC Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)50.0 Percentage of participants
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Rate of RBC Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)0.0 Percentage of participants
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Rate of RBC Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)0.0 Percentage of participants
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Rate of RBC Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)66.7 Percentage of participants
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Rate of RBC Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)0 Percentage of participants
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Rate of RBC Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)33.3 Percentage of participants
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Rate of RBC Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)100 Percentage of participants
Expansion CohortRate of RBC Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)43.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Terminal Half-Life (t ½) of Luspatercept

Blood samples were collected at specified intervals for the determination of t½. t½ was defined as the time required to divide the luspatercept plasma concentration by two after reaching pseudo-equilibrium, following a single dose of luspatercept. t½ was based on non-compartmental analysis and a mean t1/2 value was presented.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: Predose, Cycle 1: Days 8, 11, 15: Postdose; Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 8, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, and Cycle 5 Days 8, 15: Postdose (each cycle length = 21 days)

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had sufficient pharmacokinetic samples collected and assayed.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Terminal Half-Life (t ½) of Luspatercept23.78 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22.29
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Terminal Half-Life (t ½) of Luspatercept9.15 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 44.83
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Terminal Half-Life (t ½) of Luspatercept15.14 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 5.94
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Terminal Half-Life (t ½) of Luspatercept14.45 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.02
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Terminal Half-Life (t ½) of Luspatercept13.75 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.37
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Terminal Half-Life (t ½) of Luspatercept14.76 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 24.43
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Terminal Half-Life (t ½) of Luspatercept26.56 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 9.19
Expansion CohortTerminal Half-Life (t ½) of Luspatercept14.74 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 44.35
Secondary

Time to HI-E Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria

Per IWG 2006 response criteria, the time to HI-E response was defined as the first date of the rolling 8-week interval of showing response minus first dose date plus 1. HI-E response for LTB participants was defined as hemoglobin increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL during any rolling 8 weeks window and for HTB HI-E was defined as RBC transfusion reduction ≥4 units during any rolling 8 weeks. LTB participants were those who received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline. HTB participants were those who required ≥4 units of RBC transfusions within 8 weeks prior to baseline. The rolling 8-week was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study.

Time frame: Any consecutive 8 weeks during the study (up to approximately 75 weeks)

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept. Per protocol, the participants with response were pooled into low and high dose groups to increase the accuracy of the analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Time to HI-E Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria35 DaysStandard Deviation 48.1
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Time to HI-E Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria17 DaysStandard Deviation 18.3
Secondary

Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Luspatercept

Blood samples were collected at specified intervals for the determination of Tmax. Tmax was defined as time to the maximum concentration of luspatercept reached. Tmax was based on non-compartmental analysis and a mean Tmax value was presented.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: Predose, Cycle 1: Days 8, 11, 15: Postdose; Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 8, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, and Cycle 5 Days 8, 15: Postdose (each cycle length = 21 days)

Population: All participants who have received at least one dose of luspatercept and had sufficient pharmacokinetic samples collected and assayed.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept 0.125mg/kg (Cohort 1)Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Luspatercept9.93 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 35.73
Luspatercept 0.25mg/kg (Cohort 2)Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Luspatercept7.23 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.68
Luspatercept 0.50mg/kg (Cohort 3)Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Luspatercept10.16 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39.56
Luspatercept 0.75mg/kg (Cohort 4)Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Luspatercept7.16 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 5.46
Luspatercept 1.00mg/kg (Cohort 5)Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Luspatercept7.23 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.68
Luspatercept 1.33mg/kg (Cohort 6)Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Luspatercept8.47 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31.58
Luspatercept 1.75mg/kg (Cohort 7)Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Luspatercept6.65 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 8.92
Expansion CohortTime to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Luspatercept7.77 DaysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.76

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026