Skip to content

A Controlled Trial of Topiramate Treatment for Alcohol Dependence in Veterans With PTSD

A Controlled Trial of Topiramate Treatment for Alcohol Dependence in Veterans With PTSD

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01749215
Acronym
TAP2
Enrollment
151
Registered
2012-12-13
Start date
2013-02-28
Completion date
2019-07-31
Last updated
2021-06-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol Dependence, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

Keywords

pharmacotherapy, alcohol dependence, Veterans

Brief summary

The goal of this project is to improve the treatment of veterans with co-occurring alcohol dependence and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The PI and co-investigators will conduct a controlled clinical trial of topiramate for the treatment of these co-occurring disorders.

Detailed description

This project consists of a controlled clinical trial of topiramate treatment to reduce alcohol use and PTSD symptoms in veterans with these co-occurring disorders. This is a prospective randomized double-blind controlled parallel groups clinical trial of topiramate or or placebo up to 300 mg per day, combined with weekly alcohol counseling, over a 12-week treatment period with a week 16 follow-up. The study population consists of 150 male and female veterans between the ages of 18-69 who have concurrent diagnoses of alcohol use disorder and PTSD. Subjects meet with research staff weekly to receive study medication, manualized alcohol counseling, and research assessments. The primary treatment outcome is the percent of days of drinking; the secondary outcome is PTSD symptom severity. Exploratory measures include assessments of impulsivity and decision-making.

Interventions

DRUGTopiramate

Experimental study drug

DRUGplacebo

Placebo comparator

BEHAVIORALMedical Management

Brief alcohol counseling

Sponsors

United States Department of Defense
CollaboratorFED
San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center
CollaboratorFED
Northern California Institute of Research and Education
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female veterans 2. Ages18 to 69 (inclusive) 3. Current DSM-IV diagnosis of PTSD 4. Current (past month) DSM-IV diagnosis of an Alcohol Dependence 5. Level of drinking must meet criteria for at-risk or heavy drinking by NIAAA threshold (NIAAA 2007): at least 15 standard drinks per week on average over the 4 weeks prior to study entry for men and at least 8 standard drinks per week on average for women. 6. Subjects must express a desire to reduce alcohol consumption with the possible long-term goal of abstinence. 7. Female subjects must have a negative urine pregnancy test and must be either postmenopausal for at least one year, or practicing an effective method of birth control (e.g., surgically sterile, spermicide with barrier, male partner sterilization; or abstinent and agrees to continue abstinence or to use an acceptable method of contraception, as listed above, should sexual activity commence) 8. Subjects must have a Breath Alcohol Concentration (BAC) of \< 0.02% when signing informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, dementia, or other psychiatric disorders judged to be unstable. 2. Subjects known to have clinically significant unstable medical conditions, including but not limited to: * Clinically significant renal disease and/or impaired renal function as defined by clinically significant elevation of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) or creatinine or an estimated creatinine clearance of \< 60 mL/min * AST and/or ALT \>5 times the upper limit of the normal range and/or an increased serum bilirubin \>2 times the upper limit of normal. * Seizure disorders 3. History of glaucoma. 4. History of kidney stones. 5. Concurrent participation in another treatment study. 6. Female patients who are pregnant or lactating. 7. Current Topiramate use or use within the past 4 weeks. 8. Current medications for alcohol dependence (disulfiram, naltrexone, or acamprosate) or use in the past week. 9. Needing acute medical detoxification from alcohol based on a score of 12 or more on the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol Scale (CIWA-AD); 10. Subjects who are legally mandated to participate in an alcohol treatment program. 11. Subjects who have had a suicide attempt in the past 6 months or suicidal ideation in the 90 days prior to enrollment. 12. Subjects who have previously been treated with topiramate for any reason and discontinued treatment due to an adverse event or due to a hypersensitivity reaction to topiramate, 13. Subjects with seizure disorders that require anticonvulsant medications 14. Subjects currently being treated with another anticonvulsant. 15. Subjects who in the opinion of the investigator should not be enrolled in the study because of the precautions, warnings or contraindications outlined in the topiramate package insert.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Percentage of Heavy Drinking Days Over the 12 Weeks of Study Treatment as Assessed by the Timeline Followback (TFLB)Baseline to Week 12Timeline Followback (TLFB) data was recorded using a calendar, with participants providing retrospective reports of daily drinking over the past week(s). The percent of heavy drinking days per week was calculated from the calendar data. The change in percentage of heavy drinking days was calculated by subtracting Week 0 (baseline) data from Week 12. Negative scores indicate improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in PTSD Symptom Severity as Assessed by the PTSD Checklist (PCL)Baseline to Week 12The PCL is a 17-item self-report measure reflecting DSM-IV symptoms of PTSD. A total symptom severity score (range = 17-85) can be obtained by summing the scores from each of the 17 items that have response options ranging from 1 Not at all to 5 Extremely. It was calculated by subtracting the data collected at Week 0 (baseline) from data collected at Week 12. Negative scores indicate improvement.
Change in Impulsivity as Assessed by Delay Discounting (DD)Baseline to Week 12DD measures impulsivity by evaluating discount rates for delayed rewards. On a computer screen, the participant is shown hypothetical dollar amounts that could be received immediately, while a hypothetical $100 reward is displayed continuously. The delay duration is the waiting period for the $100 delayed reward. The computer randomly presents each immediate reward dollar amount, one at a time and participants are asked to choose between each immediate reward or the delayed $100. The same procedure will be repeated for each of the delay periods. Delay discounting quantifies the devaluation of rewards over time, which allows for an index of overall discounting rate (k). Higher k values indicate greater discounting and therefore greater impulsivity. DD score change was measured by subtracting Week 0 (baseline) scores from Week 12 scores, with negative scores representing improvement.
Change in Risk-taking Behavior as Assessed by the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART)Baseline to Week 12BART is a computerized measure of risk taking behavior that displays a computer-generated balloon on a computer monitor. Participants gradually pump (inflate) the balloon. Each pump adds 5 cents to a temporary bank. After each pump, participants have 2 options, 1) continue to pump the balloon and risk bursting it, losing all the money from that balloon, or 2) saving the accumulated money to a permanent bank. Whenever a balloon bursts or the participant chooses to bank money, they start with a new balloon. Participants respond to 30 balloons, each having a different bursting point. With each pump, participants weigh the potential gain of collecting more money against the risk of losing all money accumulated with that balloon. Greater number of pumps indicates greater risk taking. Change was calculated by subtracting Week 12 scores from Week 0 (baseline), with negative scores representing improvement and positive scores representing worsening risk taking.
Change in Decision-making Behavior as Assessed by the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT)Baseline to Week 12The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is a computerized assessment that evaluates decision-making by tracking the selection of advantageous or disadvantageous electronic cards from four decks. Subjects are presented the 4 decks of cards on a computer screen and are told that they can win money by picking cards from the most advantageous deck. After each deck selection, subjects are provided feedback as to whether their selection resulted in a win or a loss and the dollar amount of the win/loss. Data indicate change from baseline in mean number of cards selected from advantageous decks minus number of cards selected from disadvantageous decks as a function of drug condition. Change measured by substracting Week 0 (baseline) scores from Week 12 scores. Higher numbers indicate better decision making regarding advantageous cards.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Topiramate
Topiramate capsules daily - up to 300 mg Topiramate: Experimental study drug Medical Management: Brief alcohol counseling
72
Placebo
Placebo capsules daily - up to 300 mg placebo: Placebo comparator Medical Management: Brief alcohol counseling
79
Total151

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalTopiramate
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants17 Participants9 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
71 Participants134 Participants63 Participants
Age, Continuous52.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
51.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
51.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants31 Participants17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
65 Participants120 Participants55 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
29 Participants51 Participants22 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
12 Participants22 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
29 Participants62 Participants33 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
79 participants151 participants72 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
70 Participants132 Participants62 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 721 / 79
other
Total, other adverse events
70 / 7279 / 79
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 729 / 79

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Percentage of Heavy Drinking Days Over the 12 Weeks of Study Treatment as Assessed by the Timeline Followback (TFLB)

Timeline Followback (TLFB) data was recorded using a calendar, with participants providing retrospective reports of daily drinking over the past week(s). The percent of heavy drinking days per week was calculated from the calendar data. The change in percentage of heavy drinking days was calculated by subtracting Week 0 (baseline) data from Week 12. Negative scores indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TopiramateChange in Percentage of Heavy Drinking Days Over the 12 Weeks of Study Treatment as Assessed by the Timeline Followback (TFLB)-36.2 percent heavy drinking daysStandard Deviation 0.41
PlaceboChange in Percentage of Heavy Drinking Days Over the 12 Weeks of Study Treatment as Assessed by the Timeline Followback (TFLB)-25.1 percent heavy drinking daysStandard Deviation 0.36
Secondary

Change in Decision-making Behavior as Assessed by the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT)

The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is a computerized assessment that evaluates decision-making by tracking the selection of advantageous or disadvantageous electronic cards from four decks. Subjects are presented the 4 decks of cards on a computer screen and are told that they can win money by picking cards from the most advantageous deck. After each deck selection, subjects are provided feedback as to whether their selection resulted in a win or a loss and the dollar amount of the win/loss. Data indicate change from baseline in mean number of cards selected from advantageous decks minus number of cards selected from disadvantageous decks as a function of drug condition. Change measured by substracting Week 0 (baseline) scores from Week 12 scores. Higher numbers indicate better decision making regarding advantageous cards.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: Data were only collected for N=31 for the Topiramate arm and N=34 for the Placebo arm, as reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TopiramateChange in Decision-making Behavior as Assessed by the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT)2.03 test cardsStandard Deviation 13.8
PlaceboChange in Decision-making Behavior as Assessed by the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT)2.80 test cardsStandard Deviation 14.54
Secondary

Change in Impulsivity as Assessed by Delay Discounting (DD)

DD measures impulsivity by evaluating discount rates for delayed rewards. On a computer screen, the participant is shown hypothetical dollar amounts that could be received immediately, while a hypothetical $100 reward is displayed continuously. The delay duration is the waiting period for the $100 delayed reward. The computer randomly presents each immediate reward dollar amount, one at a time and participants are asked to choose between each immediate reward or the delayed $100. The same procedure will be repeated for each of the delay periods. Delay discounting quantifies the devaluation of rewards over time, which allows for an index of overall discounting rate (k). Higher k values indicate greater discounting and therefore greater impulsivity. DD score change was measured by subtracting Week 0 (baseline) scores from Week 12 scores, with negative scores representing improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: Data were only collected for N=22 for the Topiramate arm and N=16 for the Placebo arm, as reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TopiramateChange in Impulsivity as Assessed by Delay Discounting (DD)-0.020 K-valueStandard Deviation 0.34
PlaceboChange in Impulsivity as Assessed by Delay Discounting (DD)0.058 K-valueStandard Deviation 0.17
Secondary

Change in PTSD Symptom Severity as Assessed by the PTSD Checklist (PCL)

The PCL is a 17-item self-report measure reflecting DSM-IV symptoms of PTSD. A total symptom severity score (range = 17-85) can be obtained by summing the scores from each of the 17 items that have response options ranging from 1 Not at all to 5 Extremely. It was calculated by subtracting the data collected at Week 0 (baseline) from data collected at Week 12. Negative scores indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: Data were only collected for N=42 for the Topiramate arm and N=49 for the Placebo arm, as reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TopiramateChange in PTSD Symptom Severity as Assessed by the PTSD Checklist (PCL)-15.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.8
PlaceboChange in PTSD Symptom Severity as Assessed by the PTSD Checklist (PCL)-15.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
Secondary

Change in Risk-taking Behavior as Assessed by the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART)

BART is a computerized measure of risk taking behavior that displays a computer-generated balloon on a computer monitor. Participants gradually pump (inflate) the balloon. Each pump adds 5 cents to a temporary bank. After each pump, participants have 2 options, 1) continue to pump the balloon and risk bursting it, losing all the money from that balloon, or 2) saving the accumulated money to a permanent bank. Whenever a balloon bursts or the participant chooses to bank money, they start with a new balloon. Participants respond to 30 balloons, each having a different bursting point. With each pump, participants weigh the potential gain of collecting more money against the risk of losing all money accumulated with that balloon. Greater number of pumps indicates greater risk taking. Change was calculated by subtracting Week 12 scores from Week 0 (baseline), with negative scores representing improvement and positive scores representing worsening risk taking.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: Data were only collected for N=43 for the Topiramate arm and N=46 for the Placebo arm, as reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TopiramateChange in Risk-taking Behavior as Assessed by the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART)26.7 Total pumpsStandard Deviation 205.4
PlaceboChange in Risk-taking Behavior as Assessed by the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART)13.4 Total pumpsStandard Deviation 199

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026