Skip to content

Effects of Physiotherapy in Hemodynamics and Childrens Respiratory Mechanics

Respiratory Mechanics and Hemodynamics in Children With Respiratory Failure: Comparison of Two Techniques of Respiratory Physiotherapy

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01747954
Enrollment
12
Registered
2012-12-12
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2012-12-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Children, Respiratory Insufficiency

Keywords

Respiratory Insufficiency, Physiotherapy Techniques, Respiratory Mechanics

Brief summary

The hypothesis of this study is that respiratory physiotherapy can promote improvement in respiratory mechanics in children with respiratory failure and the bag squeezing maneuver is more effective in improving respiratory mechanics in childrens and does not alter the hemodynamic proved safe

Interventions

OTHERBag Squeezing

To perform the BS technique, we used a Protec® manual inflation bag with a flow of 10 L / min and 100% oxygen. A Commercial Medical® manometer was adapted between the orotracheal tube and the inflation bag to monitor the inflation pressure which was recommendedat 30 cmH2O for all children of the BS group. Initially we instilled at most 0.5 ml saline solution(SS) at 0.9% followed by 10 manual hyperinflation maneuvers interspersed with 10 vibrocompression maneuvers and as a last procedure, we performed an aspiration of the orotracheal tube airways and mouth. Between the aspirations the child was re-connected to the ventilator.

OTHERThoracic vibrocompression

To perform the TVC technique, we applied 10 vibrocompression maneuvers on the chest of the children during the expiratory phase of the respiratory cycle, on each of the lateral decubitus position, totaling 20 maneuvers, followed by aspiration in the dorsal decubitus position. All measurements in both study groups were performed with the child connected to the ventilator. Before starting the maneuver BS or TVC the child received an increase of 20% fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) from what was received previously in MV and after data collection FiO2 returned to baseline values.

Sponsors

Federal University of Uberlandia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 60 Months
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* children aged between one and 60 months * diagnosed with respiratory failure * undergoing mechanical ventilation

Exclusion criteria

* had traumatic brain injury * severe thrombocytopenia (\<20,000 pl/mm³) * hypovolemia and cyanogenic congenital heart defects * pneumothorax, hemothorax and/or pleural effusion without previous drainage

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effects of Bag Squeezing and vibrocompression chest in hemodynamic, resistance and respiratory system complianceone hundred twenty minutesAll variables were assessed prior to the proposed technique (pre-maneuver), immediately after the execution of the technique randomly chosen (post-maneuver), 30, 60 and 120 after the end of the technique randomly chosen. The mean of three readings was used as the representative value for each variable. All children were ventilated with the same mechanical Dixtal® DX3020 Brazil ventilator

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
comparing all variables between the two groupsone hundred twenty minutes

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026