Skip to content

Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve From Computed Tomography

Individual-Patient-Data Pooled-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve From Anatomic CT Angiography

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01747317
Acronym
PERFECT
Enrollment
300
Registered
2012-12-11
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2013-04-30
Last updated
2012-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

FFR, fractional flow reserve, CT, Computed Tomography

Brief summary

Fractional Flow Reserve derived from computed tomography(FFRCT) is a novel method for determining the physiologic significance of coronary artery disease (CAD), which will help physicians in clinical decision-making and decrease the medical cost, but its ability to identify patients with ischemia has not been adequately examined to date.

Detailed description

Fractional Flow Reserve derived from computed tomography(FFRCT) is a novel method for determining the physiologic significance of coronary artery disease (CAD), which will help physicians in clinical decision-making and decrease the medical cost, but its ability to identify patients with ischemia has not been adequately examined to date. Available data from registered clinical trials has testified the diagnostic performance of FFRCT, but the diagnostic accuracy among them are not consistent. Thus, the investigators designed a collaborative individual patient-data pooled-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT and find the possible cause for inconsistency

Interventions

DEVICEFFR (PressureWire)

Fractional flow reserve measured during cardiac catheterization--A pressure-monitoring guidewire(PressureWire Certus, St. Jude Medical Systems, Uppsala, Sweden;ComboWire, Volcano Corporation, San Diego, California) will be advanced past the stenosis.

Sponsors

Shanghai 10th People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Coronary computed tomographic angiography(CCTA) with over 50 percent stenosis in a major coronary artery over 2mm diameter * Undergoing clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography with FFR

Exclusion criteria

* A history of CABG surgery * Prior percutaneous coronary intervention with suspected instent restenosis * Suspicion of or recent acute coronary syndrome * Complex congenital heart disease * Prior pacemaker or defibrillator * Prosthetic heart valve * Significant arrhythmia * heart rate \>100 beats/min * systolic blood pressure≤90 mmHg * contraindication to beta blockers, nitroglycerin or adenosine * Serum creatinine level greater than 1.5 mg per dL * Allergy to iodinated contrast * Pregnant state * Body mass index greater than 35 * Evidence of active clinical instability or lifethreatening disease * Canadian Cardiovascular Society class IV angina * nonevaluable CCTA as determined by the CCTA core laboratory * Inability to adhere to study procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic Accuracy of FFRCT1 dayDiagnostic accuracy\[Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV)\]\* of FFRCT to determine presence or absence of at least one hemodynamically (HD)-significant coronary artery stenosis at the subject level using binary outcomes when compared to FFR as the reference standard..\*Sensitivity measures the proportion of actual positives which are correctly identified. Specificity measures the proportion of negatives which are correctly identified;PPV, or precision rate is the proportion of positive test results that are true positives (such as correct diagnoses);NPV is defined as the proportion of subjects with a negative test result who are correctly diagnosed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT at the subject level1 daySensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of FFRCT at the subject level using binary outcomes when compared to FFR as the reference standard.
Diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT at the vessel level1 daySensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of FFRCT for the presence or absence of HD-significant coronary artery stenosis at the vessel level using binary outcomes when compared to FFR as the reference standard.
FFR Numerical Correlation1 dayPer-vessel correlation of the FFRCT numerical value alone with the FFR numerical value measured during cardiac catheterization.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026