Skip to content

Infiltration of the Vestibulum Vaginae With Botulin Toxin in Patients With Localized Provoked Vulvodynia

Randomized Placebo Controlled Double Blind Study: Efficacy and Safety of Infiltration of the Vestibulum Vaginae With Botulin Toxin in Patients With Localized Provoked Vulvodynia.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01747161
Acronym
VVS-01
Enrollment
5
Registered
2012-12-11
Start date
2013-12-17
Completion date
2018-06-19
Last updated
2018-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Localized Provoked Vulvodynia

Brief summary

In this study we will investigate the efficacy and safety of infiltration of the vestibulum vaginae with botulin toxin in women who were diagnosed with localized provoked vulvodynia. In literature covering this subject we find that the prevalence of this condition is between 10 and 15%. Especially young, sexually active women suffer from this problem and some of them are not capable of having sexual relations with their partner because of this burning pain. The most probable explanation for the physiopathological mechanism is an increase of nerve endings in the epithelium of the vestibulum, with an increase and activation of pain receptors in the vestibular mucosa. It also seems that patients with vestibulodynia have a higher tonus of the pelvic floor muscles, a greater muscle contraction in response to pain and a lower capacity of relaxation. Botulin toxin (Botox) is a neurotoxin that causes a temporary paralysis of the muscle cells. That way it can decrease the increased tension of the pelvic floor muscles Botox also inhibits the pain receptors in the vestibulum. Patients will be recruited through the gynecology consultations. Every patient with localized provoked vulvodynia that has tried previous treatments (pelvic floor muscle therapy, antidepressants, anti-epileptics, local anesthetics) will undergo Q-tip testing. If positive and there are no underlying diseases, the patient will be invited to participate in the study and after oral and written informed consent, will be included in the study population. Every 6 weeks there will be given injections with 50 units of botulin toxin, on 6 different spots in the vestibulum. 50 % of the subjects will receive physiological water instead of Botox (control population). After 3 sessions, we will assess if there is any difference in provoked pain in treated patients vs. placebos through Q-tip testing.

Interventions

DRUGBotulin toxin

50 I.E. Botulin toxin. Injections in 6 spots of the vestibulum vaginae (3 sessions (every 6 weeks))

DRUGphysiological water

3 mL physiological water. Injections in 6 spots of the vestibulum vaginae (3 sessions (every 6 weeks))

Sponsors

University Hospital, Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* +18 years, of sound mind * Dutch speaking * Previously treated for this condition with neuropathic pain medication (antidepressants and anti-epileptics) * in good health

Exclusion criteria

* systemic diseases * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
to evaluate the efficacy and safety of botulin toxin in alleviating dyspareunia associated with localized provoked vulvodynia.every 6 weeks up to week 18Before each session (every 6 weeks) and after the last session the patients will have to fill in a FSFI questionnaire. This way we can evaluate the influence of the therapy on the patients' sexual wellbeing. (efficacy) * Before each sessions and 6 weeks after the last injection, patients will undergo Q-tip testing. This way we can objectively evaluate the pain score over the vestibulum. (efficacy) * Recording of self-reported side-effects

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026