Skip to content

Prospective Study of the Influence of the Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls of the Pain on the Efficacy of Milnacipran in Fibromyalgia Therapy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01747044
Enrollment
48
Registered
2012-12-11
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2014-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromylagia

Keywords

Fibromyalgia, Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls, Milnacipran

Brief summary

Fibromyalgia affects 0.7 to 3.3% of the adult population and 7-10 times more women than men. In France, the prevalence is 1.6% according to a French study conducted in 2009 and published in 2011 by Serge Perrot et al. The definition of fibromyalgia was recently amended with particular consideration of cognitive and somatic symptoms, factors not involved in the initial criteria of the ACR classification. Several factors are in favor of a malfunction of the central modulation of pain and poorer performance noxious inhibitory controls descendants (DNIC: diffuse noxious inhibitory controls) have been demonstrated. In fibromyalgia patients, the DNIC (diffuse noxious inhibitory controls) are altered with less pain inhibition than controls. Dysfunction of the central pain modulation is widely described in the literature and contributes to pain complained of fibromyalgia. According to the Recommendations of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2006, antidepressants have a genuine analgesic efficacy in controlled studies. Milnacipran is an antidepressant known and used in major depressive disorder according to its marketing authorization but is also part of the molecules used in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia according to the recommendations of the EULAR. A review included five double-blind studies on 4,000 participants who took 100 mg or 200 mg milnacipran or placebo over a period of 8 weeks to 24 weeks. A moderate response was obtained for 40% of participants treated for each dose of milnacipran on the criteria of at least 30% pain relief Impression and global change. Substantial improvement with milnacipran compared to placebo has been shown. To date, the link between the weakening of DNIC in fibromyalgia and effectiveness of drug treatment has not been shown. This study aims to assess the degree of impairment of DNIC in fibromyalgia patients may be predictive of the efficacy of milnacipran.

Detailed description

Visit 1 Inclusion of the patient, Clinical examination, Evaluation of pain, basal Pain and cognitive tests Visit 2 (can be coupled with Visit 1 if necessary) Randomisation of the patient and allocation of the treatment for 1 month. Phone contact Visit 2 +7 days, + 15 days, +21 days Follow-up of the compliance of the treatment and collection of adverse events. Visit 3 (follow up at 1 month) Evaluation of pain, Pain and cognitive tests End of study

Interventions

DRUGMilnacipran

100mg/day

DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Dr. Gisèle PICKERING (MCU, PH) Center of clinical pharmacology/CIC Inserm-501 - Main investigator
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Dr Pascale PICARD/ Dr Noémie Delage / Dr Fabienne RIAUX - Center of evaluation and treatment of the pain - Investigator
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Dr Gilles DUCHEIX/ Center of clinical pharmacology/CIC Inserm-501 - Investigator
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Dr Christian DUALE/ Center of clinical pharmacology/CIC Inserm-501 - Investigator
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient of more than 18 years old, * Patient with fibromyalgia

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with a contraindication to the administration of the milnacipran, * Patient with a concomitant spontaneous pain not attributable of fibromyalgia, * Patient with medical and/or surgical histories judged by the investigator not compatible with the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain scores on the verbal numeric scaleat T0 and T0+1 month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
sensitivity and pain thresholds to a mechanical stimulusat T0 and T0+1 month
sensitivity and pain thresholds to a thermal stimulusat T0 and T0+1 month
scores on cognitive testsat T0 and T0+1 month
Adverse events recordat T0 and T0+1 month

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactPatrick LACARIN
placarin@chu-clermontferrand.fr04 73 75 11 95

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026