Skip to content

Closed Vitrification of Oocytes

Impact of a Closed System in Donor Oocyte Vitrification

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01745536
Enrollment
0
Registered
2012-12-10
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2016-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Keywords

Oocyte vitrification, survival rate, egg banking, ovum donation

Brief summary

This study is aimed to evaluate the use of a closed device for storage of vitrified oocytes.

Detailed description

The Cryotop method for oocyte vitrification is classified as open system, which means that it requires direct contact with liquid nitrogen during the vitrification process. The system has an external straw to protect the samples during storage, but the device is not hermetically sealed. Instead closed systems are devices that are hermetically sealed before vitrification and remain sealed during storage. Open systems have proven highly effective in achieving similar outcomes with vitrified oocytes compared to those achieved with fresh ones. On the contrary, closed systems have failed to be as effective as open ones when used for oocyte vitrification. Although open systems have proven to be highly efficient, where many other methods have failed, they have been related to a theoretical risk of contamination due to direct contact with liquid nitrogen. Though to date there have been no reported cases of transmission of disease after cryo-transfers either for slow freezing or vitrification, some European countries prohibit the use of open systems for vitrification. In this study, we will evaluate the results after the donor oocyte vitrification, using a modification of a current device (Cryotop®), which makes it capable of being hermetically sealed. The current study is a prospective randomized trial aimed to assess the outcome of ovum donation cycles conducted with vitrified oocytes using the closed device versus oocytes vitrified using the traditional open device.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOocytes are vitrified/stored using a closed device

Vitrification will be carried out using a modification of the current device (Cryotop®), thus providing air tight sealing. Closed systems are devices that are hermetically sealed before vitrification and remain sealed during storage.

PROCEDUREOocytes are vitrified/stored using an open device

The vitrification process takes place through direct contact with liquid nitrogen. The system has an external straw to protect the samples during storage, but the device is not hermetically sealed.

Sponsors

Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIA
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Donors: * \< 35 years old * Normal physical and gynecological examinations * No family history of hereditary or chromosomal diseases. * Normal karyotype * Negative screening for sexually transmitted diseases. Oocyte recipients: * Oocyte recipients \< 50 years old * Body mass index \< 30 * \< 2 previous IVF failures * No severe male factor * No recurrent miscarriage * No hidrosalpinx * No myoma * No adenomyosis * No AMH alterations

Exclusion criteria

Donors and recipients not meeting inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival after oocyte vitrification using the closed device Cryotop®>2 hoursSurvival will be evaluated morphologically two hours after warming.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Embryo developmentFrom thawing and until pregnancy outcome (0-9 months)

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026