Skip to content

Treatment of Pendular Nystagmus With Gabapentin and Memantine in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01744444
Enrollment
10
Registered
2012-12-06
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2025-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pendular Nystagmus Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

Brief summary

Different treatment trials have been published in acquired nystagmus in the last decade; gabapentin and memantine have been found to be efficient in treating pendular nystagmus in Multiple Sclerosis. The effects of treatments are measured on nystagmus velocity, amplitude, frequency and on visual acuity. None of the trials measured a functional visual score or oscillopsia score. The aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of gabapentin and memantine on the mean velocity, amplitude and frequency of pendular nystagmus, as well as on oscillopsia, visual acuity and vision-specific health-related quality of life score, in 10 patients with multiple sclerosis. The primary object is to find out the best variable to evaluate the efficiency of nystagmus treatment and the secondary, to compare the efficiency of both gabapentin and memantine in a common population of patients.

Interventions

DRUGMemantine

Patients will be randomly assigned to start on either memantine or gabapentin. For tolerance reasons, each treatment begins with a progressive increasing dose and stops with a progressive decreasing dose. The duration of the period of last dose (8 to 11 days) will be chosen according to the investigator's availability to organize post-tests.

DRUGGabapentin

Patients will be randomly assigned to start on either memantine or gabapentin. For tolerance reasons, each treatment begins with a progressive increasing dose and stops with a progressive decreasing dose. The duration of the period of last dose (8 to 11 days) will be chosen according to the investigator's availability to organize post-tests.

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients may have a clinically definite, laboratory-supported diagnosis of multiple sclerosis according to the Mac Donald criteria. * All patients may present a chronic acquired pendular nystagmus due to MS, observed over a period of 6 months. * All patients will be informed about the design and purpose of the study, and all will give their informed, written consent to the protocol, which may have been approved by the local ethics committee. * Age: above 18 * Able to understand the instructions * Having a health coverage * Able to sit down for 1 hour * Stable dosage of previous medications (beginning 3 weeks previously and terminating at the end of the trial duration), except for steroids, gabapentin or memantine.

Exclusion criteria

* Ophthalmological * Other ophthalmological disorder that could impair corrected visual acuity (Maculopathy, Retinopathy…) * Neurological * Ongoing seizure * Severe handicap that does not allow sitting down position for 1 hour * Suicidal behavior or risk * Treatment * Under memantine or gabapentin medication (these medications should have been stopped for at least 1 week for gabapentin and 3 weeks for memantine) * Under morphine, N-methyl-D-aspartate such as amantadine, ketamine or dextromethorphan * Steroid medication for a current relapse (beginning 3 weeks previously and terminating at the end of the trial duration) * Known hypersensitivity to memantine or gabapentin * General * Unstable medical state * Patient with a galactose intolerance, a lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption * Moderate renal failure (creatinine clearance \< 50 mL/min on bioassay dated from less than one month) * Recent heart infarction (\<3months) * Unstable congestive heart insufficiency * Unstable arterial hypertension * Leucopenia (\<2500/mm3) * Transaminase increase (\>5 time normal values) * Pregnancy (on questioning) * Tutelage or any legal protection measure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Velocity using eye movement recordingat Day17-21

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Functional score on questioningat Day17-21, Day34-42, Day64-79, Day81-100
Subjective measure of oscillopsiaat Day17-21, Day34-42, Day64-79, Day81-100
Far visual acuityat Day17-21, Day34-42, Day64-79, Day81-100

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026