Skip to content

Sandostatin LAR and Axitinib vs Pbo in Pnts With Advanced Well-differentiated Non-pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

A Phase II/III Randomized Double-blind Study of Sandostatin LAR in Combination With Axitinib Versus Sandostatin LAR With Placebo in Patients With Advanced G1-G2 Neuroendocrine Tumours (WHO 2010) of Non-pancreatic Origin

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01744249
Enrollment
256
Registered
2012-12-06
Start date
2011-11-01
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2026-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Cancer, Neuroendocrine Tumors

Keywords

Advanced neuroendocrine tumours of non-pancreatic origin, axitinib

Brief summary

Assess whether therapy with axitinib, a potent angiogenic inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase receptors of VEGF bioavailable by oral administration, is capable of improving PFS in patients with advanced G1-G2 NETs of nonpancreatic origin with progressive disease documented in the 12 months prior to entering the study.

Detailed description

Phase II/III, prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1), double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of axitinib in patients diagnosed with advanced G1-G2 neuroendocrine tumors (WHO 2010) of nonpancreatic origin that have presented documented disease progression in the 12 months prior to entering the study. In the first part of the study (Phase II), 105 patients were enrolled. The second part of the study is the expansion to Phase III, which is expected to include 148 additional patients. Patients will be randomized to receive Sandostatin LAR with axitinib or Sandostatin LAR with placebo until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs. Randomization will be stratified by the time from diagnosis to enrollment in the study (more vs less than or equal to 12 months), the origin of the primary tumor (gastrointestinal tract vs non-gastrointestinal tract \[lung or other sites\]) and ki-67 (\< 5% vs \> 5%).

Interventions

DRUGAxitinib

Orally, 5mg, twice daily, until progression or until unacceptable toxicity, with or without food intake.

Intramuscular, 30mg, single injection every 28 days, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

DRUGPlacebo

orally, twice daily, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, with or without food intake.

Sponsors

Grupo Espanol de Tumores Neuroendocrinos
Lead SponsorOTHER
Pfizer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. G1-G2 neuroendocrine tumor (WHO 2010) of histologically confirmed non-pancreatic origin, functioning and nonfunctioning 2. Metastatic or locally advanced disease not amenable to treatment with curative intent 3. Clinical and/or radiological disease progression documented in the 12 months prior to study entry. 4. Patients should have at least one measurable lesion as defined by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Patients should not have undergone local or regional ablative procedures (embolization, cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, or others) in the 6 months prior to entering the study, unless there are other locations of measurable disease or clear radiological progression after carrying out these procedures (in these cases, local and regional ablation procedures shall be permitted if they have been performed at least 1 month prior to enrollment in the study). 5. Ki-67 \< 20% 6. Prior treatment with somatostatin analogues is allowed 7. Prior treatment with interferon is allowed 8. Prior treatment is allowed with up to 2 antineoplastic systemic treatment lines different from SAs or IFN (systemic treatment is understood as conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy or new drugs for therapeutic targets as mTOR or other, as long as it is not directed against VEGF/VEGFR). Treatment with SAs or IFN does not count as prior lines of antineoplastic treatment. 9. Prior treatment with targeted therapy against VEGF or VEGFR is not allowed. 10. Adequate organ function as defined by the following criteria: * Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1500 cells/mm3, * Platelet count ≥ 75,000 cells/mm3, * Hemoglobin ≥ 9.0 g/dL, * AST y ALT ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), except if liver metastases exist, in which case AST and ALT 5.0 ≤ x ULN is allowed, * Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, * Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN or calculated creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min, * Proteinuria \< 2+ by reactive strip. If the reactive strip is ≥ 2+, a 24-hour urine sample should be collected and the patient may be eligible if urinary protein excretion is \< 2 g every 24 hours. 11. Men or women aged ≥ 18 years. 12. ECOG performance status 0-2 13. Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks 14. At least 4 weeks should pass from the end of the previous systemic treatment with resolution of all treatment-related toxicities to grade ≤ 1 according to NCI CTCAE Version 4.0 or to baseline, except for alopecia or properly treated hypothyroidism. 15. No prior evidence of uncontrolled hypertension should exist, as documented by 2 baseline blood pressure readings taken at least 1 hour apart. Baseline readings of systolic blood pressure should be ≤ 150 mm Hg and baseline readings of diastolic pressure should be ≤ 90 mm Hg. Patients whose hypertension is being controlled with antihypertensive therapy are eligible. 16. Women (or their partners) should be surgically sterilized or postmenopausal, or must agree to use an effective contraceptive method during and for at least 6 months after receiving study treatment. All women of childbearing age should have a negative pregnancy test (serum/urine) within 7 days prior to starting treatment. Men (or their partners) should be surgically sterilized or must agree to use an effective contraceptive method during and for at least 6 months after receiving study treatment. The definition of an effective contraceptive method must comply with local regulations and will be based on the criterion of the principal investigator or a designated associate. Lactating women may not participate in this study. 17. Signed and dated informed consent document stating that the patient has been informed of all the pertinent aspects of the trial prior to recruitment. 18. Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plans (including willingness to take axitinib or placebo according to randomization), laboratory tests, and other study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

1\. Subjects must be evaluated with regard to the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of Axitinib in Terms of PFS (Investigator Assessment)From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to approximately 25 monthsCalculated from the date of random assignment until the date of first progressive disease or death, whichever occurs first. Progression of the disease was assessed by investigators using tumor imaging computed tomography scans and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 PFS was analysed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Patients alive with no event at data cut off were censored on their last tumor assessment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response Rate (ORR) (Investigator Assessment)From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to approximately 25 monthsMeasured changes in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions measured in mm according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Assessed by investigators. Patients are categorized depending on the percentage of tumor redution: Complete response (CR): dissapearance of all lesions Partial response (PR): reduction \> 30% in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions Stable disease (SD): Tumor size betwee 30% reduction and 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions Progressive disease (PD): increase \> 20% in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions ORR comprise all patients who achieved at least a CR or PR at any timepoint during follow-up.
Biochemical Response (5-OH-indoleacetic Acid and Chromogranin A)From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to approximately 25 monthsmeasurable in mL/ 24h and ng/ml respectively, through blood and urine test in patients with baseline elevation of CgA or 5-HIAA levels. This endpoint measures the negativization of these two tumor biomarkers.
Safety and Tolerability of Axitinib (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [NCI-CTCAE], Version 4.0)From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to approximately 25 monthsAll adverse events and serious adverse events will be monitored with regular monitoring of hematology and blood chemistry parameters and regular physical examinations. Adverse events will be evaluated continuously throughout the study. Safety and tolerability will be assessed according to the National Institute of Health/National Cancer Institute (NIH/NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 (CTCAE v4)
Efficacy of Axitinib in Terms of PFS (Central Blinded Assessment)From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to approximately 25 monthsCalculated from the date of random assignment until the date of first progressive disease or death, whichever occurs first. Progression of the disease was assessed by central blinded reviewers using tumor imaging by computed tomography scans and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 PFS was analysed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Patients alive with no event at data cut off were censored on their last tumor assessment
Objective Response Rate (ORR) (Central Blinded Assessment)From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to approximately 25 monthsMeasured changes in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions measured in mm according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Assessed by central blinded reviewers. Patients are categorized depending on the percentage of tumor redution: Complete response (CR): dissapearance of all lesions Partial response (PR): reduction \> 30% in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions Stable disease (SD): Tumor size betwee 30% reduction and 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions Progressive disease (PD): increase \> 20% in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions ORR comprise all patients who achieved at least a CR or PR at any timepoint during follow-up.

Countries

Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRRocio Garcia Carbonero, MD

Hospital 12 de Octubre

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients enrolled and randomized

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
5-HIAA levels
> 1 x ULN
10 Participants
5-HIAA levels
> 2 x ULN
51 Participants
5-HIAA levels
Not determined
40 Participants
5-HIAA levels
≤ ULN
20 Participants
Age, Continuous60 years
Carcinoid syndrome
Absent
101 Participants
Carcinoid syndrome
Present
35 Participants
Chromogranin A (CGA) levels
> 1 x ULN
30 Participants
Chromogranin A (CGA) levels
> 2 x ULN
78 Participants
Chromogranin A (CGA) levels
Not determined
23 Participants
Chromogranin A (CGA) levels
≤ upper limit normal (ULN)
37 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS)
Score 0
163 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS)
Score 1
49 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS)
Score 2
1 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS)
Unknown
1 Participants
Ki-67
ki-67 0-2
43 Participants
Ki-67
ki-67 >10 - 20
19 Participants
Ki-67
ki-67 >2-5
45 Participants
Ki-67
ki-67 >5 - 10
27 Participants
Ki-67
Not specified
3 Participants
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels
> 1 x ULN
24 Participants
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels
Not determined
12 Participants
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels
≤ ULN
180 Participants
Metastatic sites
Bone
Affected
33 Participants
Metastatic sites
Bone
Not Affected
97 Participants
Metastatic sites
Liver
Affected
225 Participants
Metastatic sites
Liver
Not Affected
15 Participants
Metastatic sites
Lung
Affected
17 Participants
Metastatic sites
Lung
Not Affected
109 Participants
Metastatic sites
Lymph nodes
Affected
66 Participants
Metastatic sites
Lymph nodes
Not Affected
61 Participants
Number of Organs Affected
1 location
41 Participants
Number of Organs Affected
2 locations
48 Participants
Number of Organs Affected
≥3 locations
42 Participants
Number of prior lines of systemic treatment
0 line
61 Participants
Number of prior lines of systemic treatment
1 line
84 Participants
Number of prior lines of systemic treatment
≥2
29 Participants
Primary tumour location
Colorectal
24 Participants
Primary tumour location
Gastric
3 Participants
Primary tumour location
Lung
38 Participants
Primary tumour location
Other locations
10 Participants
Primary tumour location
Small intestine
60 Participants
Primary tumour location
Unknown primary
16 Participants
Prior systemic treatments
Chemotherapy
Administered
33 Participants
Prior systemic treatments
Chemotherapy
NOT administered
223 Participants
Prior systemic treatments
Everolimus
Administered
14 Participants
Prior systemic treatments
Everolimus
NOT administered
225 Participants
Prior systemic treatments
Radioligand therapy (RLT)
Administered
12 Participants
Prior systemic treatments
Radioligand therapy (RLT)
NOT administered
126 Participants
Prior systemic treatments
Somatostatin analogs (SSA)
Administered
58 Participants
Prior systemic treatments
Somatostatin analogs (SSA)
NOT administered
73 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
67 Participants
Time from initial cancer diagnosis to study entry
≤ 12 months
105 Participants
Time from initial cancer diagnosis to study entry
> 12 months
79 Participants
Tumor grade (WHO)
Grade 1
78 Participants
Tumor grade (WHO)
Grade 2
94 Participants
Tumor grade (WHO)
Unknown
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
68 / 12548 / 130
other
Total, other adverse events
121 / 125124 / 130
serious
Total, serious adverse events
48 / 12530 / 130

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 29, 2026