Skip to content

Neck Mobs and Impingement

The Addition of Cervical Unilateral Posterior Anterior Mobilization (UPA) in the Treatment of Patients With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01744002
Enrollment
68
Registered
2012-12-06
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2013-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Shoulder and Neck

Keywords

Shoulder, Impingement syndrome, Neck

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to investigate whether treatment directed at the neck and shoulder is more beneficial than treatment directed solely at the shoulder; for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. (The hypothesis is that patients who receive neck mobilization will improve at a more significant rate than those who do not receive neck mobilization)

Detailed description

All treatment will be provided by licensed physical therapist within the United States. The clinicians affiliated with this study have experience in data collection and have participated in a recent trial that was sponsored by Walsh University. At baseline, after consent for the study, patients will be randomized into two groups: 1) shoulder treatment and active mobilization to the neck and 2) shoulder treatment and placebo mobilization to the neck. Baseline data will be collected including all self-report measures. Both groups will receive shoulder treatment with an emphasis on 1) range of motion activities, 2) joint mobilization, 3) rotator cuff strengthening and 4) a home exercise program that consists of shoulder strengthening exercises. The active neck group will receive UPA's to the cervical spine; applied as 3 X 30 seconds, to each comparable (stiff or painful) segment. The physical therapist will place their hands on the neck of the patient for the placebo group but will not perform the oscillations that are characteristic of mobilization. All patients will receive a home program designed to increase range of motion and strength. None of the home program focused exercises will be targeted to the neck. The shoulder exercises will be tailored to each specific patient and will not be standardized. Patients will be treated for the duration of their care using the same foci (1) range of motion activities, 2) joint mobilization, 3) rotator cuff strengthening and 4) a home exercise program that consists of shoulder strengthening exercises). The length of the treatment will be determined by the progress of the patient and by the attending therapist.

Interventions

OTHERShoulder treatment and neck mobilization

This group will receive shoulder treatment with an emphasis on 1) range of motion activities, 2) joint mobilization, 3) rotator cuff strengthening and 4) a home exercise program that consists of shoulder strengthening exercises; and joint mobilizations to the neck.

OTHERControl

This group will receive shoulder treatment with an emphasis on 1) range of motion activities, 2) joint mobilization, 3) rotator cuff strengthening and 4) a home exercise program that consists of shoulder strengthening exercises.

Sponsors

Walsh University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients, age 18 and older, with shoulder impingement syndrome, who attend care at a physical therapy outpatient setting, will be screened for eligibility for the study by the treating physical therapists. For patients to meet inclusion requirements, they require the following: 1. Report pain or dysfunction with elevated (overhead) arm activities, Demonstrate pain during active shoulder movements 2. Demonstrate a positive Neer or Hawkins Kennedy Test 3. Report an onset that is non-traumatic 4. Report an onset within the last 12 months 5. Demonstrate a painful arc of movement during forward elevation of the arm from 60° to 120°

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quick Disabilities of Shoulder and Hand Questionaire (QuickDASH)participants will be followed for the duration of the treatment which is on average 4 weeksThe QuickDASH is a shortened version of the DASH Outcome Measure. Instead of 30 items, the QuickDASH uses 11 items to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. The tool has been validated and has similar psychometric properties to the DASH

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)participants will be followed for the duration of the treatment which is on average 4 weeksThe NPRS will be used to capture the patient's level of pain. Patients will be asked to indicate the intensity of current, best, and worst levels of pain over the past 24 hours, using an 11-point scale ranging from 0 no pain to 10 worst pain imaginable. The average of the 3 ratings will be used to represent the patient's level of pain over the previous 24 hours.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)participants will be followed for the duration of the treatment which is on average 4 weeksThe PASS is the symptom state in which the patients feel that their current well-being is acceptable. The question is dichotomous (yes or no)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026