Skip to content

Optical Imaging Measurement of Intravascular Solution Efficacy Trial

Optical Imaging Measurement of Intravascular Solution Efficacy Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01743872
Acronym
OPTIMISE
Enrollment
23
Registered
2012-12-06
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2022-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Artery Disease

Keywords

Optical Coherence Tomography, Contrast, Dextran, Carbon Dioxide, Imaging, Catheter, Lower Extremity Artery

Brief summary

Iodinated contrast is the current gold standard for infrainguinal angiography imaging in patients without renal insufficiency and has also been used with intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography (iOCT) to improve image quality in human coronary arteries as well as carotid arteries. The current debate in the literature for iOCT medium is between iodinated contrast and dextran and CO2 may offer a superior method of iOCT imaging during lower extremity occlusive disease interventions. The investigators hypothesize that the CO2 medium injection during iOCT data acquisition is feasible and will produce at least the same quality of imaging as that obtained with contrast or dextran without causing the problems of volume overload and renal toxicity seen with the two latter mediums. Primary Outcomes Measured * Quality: Cumulative number of clear image frame (CIF) through the entire 54mm length segment. * Quantitative: Calculations of the area and diameter of each segment will be measured to determine if index of refraction has any effect between the three mediums to be tested. The investigators expect to find little difference between all three iOCT mediums and hope to conclude that CO2 offers a superior side effect profile for iOCT imaging in the lower extremity arterial system.

Detailed description

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects anywhere from 8-12 Million people in the United States. Many of these people go on to develop claudication, rest pain, and tissue loss. During the workup for these disease states many imaging modalities are conducted including Pulse Volume Recording, Duplex Ultrasound, Angiography, and IVUS, but an emerging catheter based imaging has been developed that may supplement the current modalities used. Intravascular optical coherence tomography (iOCT) is based on near-infrared light system. The light reflects off plaque and other objects within vessels and the signals are processed into a series of axial images (A-scans) at different positions along the artery to generate a two-dimensional dataset (B-scans). These images are created at an extremely fine resolution of 10-15 μm, which has allowed iOCT to be used in many research settings including PAD and coronary artery disease. OCT has been approved for clinical use in the coronary territory by the FDA in May 2010. Since then many centers have been using iOCT in the daily clinical practice. However, it's still not widely in the clinical management of patients with PAD. There is hope that the high resolution capabilities of iOCT may help before and after an intervention to predict outcomes or correct errors in stent deployment. The iOCT procedure for lower extremity PAD is fairly straightforward. An introducer is placed into the femoral artery. After which a wire is placed past the lesion of interest and the iOCT catheter is inserted. The catheter is then attached to an automated pullback device. Next an optical medium is needed to displace the erythrocytes. Due to the high resolution of the iOCT this is necessary for a cleaner image to analyze. At the time of injection of the optical medium a sensor triggers the catheter to be withdrawn (distal to proximal) at anywhere from 10-25 mm/sec. The images are captured and processed and arterial plaque can be characterized. The greatest strength of the iOCT catheter is its high resolution images but the problem is that the imaging signal is substantially attenuated by blood. In order to remedy this complication techniques such as proximal balloon occlusion and continuous infusion of a fluid have been used to acquire improved iOCT images. In the continuous infusion methods, different mediums have been injected such as contrast, dextran, and even an oxygen-carrying substitute in hopes of improving decreasing the attenuation by blood. In order the overcome the attenuation of red blood cells during iOCT imaging, we are proposing a novel approach involving CO2 injection to clear the erythrocytes. Currently CO2 is used as medium for digital subtraction angiography in patients with renal insufficiency and was first used in humans by Hawkins in 1982. The other alternative for angiography, iodinated contrast medium, is nephrotoxic and thus is avoided in these patients for fear of exacerbating the patient's acute or chronic problem. Another group where CO2 angiography is employed is history of a contrast allergy. Although this technique is usually used under these circumstances, Kerns et al reports conducting CO2 angiography in as high as 20% of their patients with abdominal and lower extremity studies. In addition to the benefits of patients with allergies and renal insufficiency, CO2 is extremely safe in a variety of arterial and venous applications. It is 20 times as soluble as room air and is expired through the lungs in a first-pass-type effect. The current contraindication to CO2 digital subtraction angiography is that the cerebral arterial circulation should never be exposed to CO2 because of possible neurotoxicity. Relative contraindications include use in the presence of a large arteriovenous shunt, with nitrous oxide anesthesia, and used cautiously in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Dextran has been used in the past in the critical care setting of human as a volume expander with the rare side effects of anaphylaxis and nephrotoxicity. It has also been used in human coronary arteries with iOCT as a blood displacement medium. Finally it has been used with iOCT in a proximal occlusion model. The main complaint in the final study was a burning sensation that lasted \< 10s. Iodinated contrast is the current gold standard for infrainguinal angiography imaging in patients without renal insufficiency and has also been used with iOCT to improve image quality in human coronary arteries as well as carotid arteries. The current debate in the literature for iOCT medium is between iodinated contrast and dextran and CO2 may offer a superior method of iOCT imaging during lower extremity occlusive disease interventions.

Interventions

PROCEDUREContrast Injection

Media #1: IV Contrast (Omnipaque 350) will be continuously injected at a rate range of 2.5-6ml/s for a maximum of 5 seconds. (Volume range of 12.5- 30ml) Intervention protocol will be followed per Cross-Reference Intervention.

PROCEDUREDextran Injection

Media #2: Dextran 40 Solution will be continuously injected at a rate range of 2.5-6ml/s for a maximum of 5 seconds. (Volume range of 12.5- 30ml. Intervention protocol will be followed per Cross-Reference Intervention.

PROCEDURECO2 Injection

Media #3: Carbon Dioxide (CO2) will be injected with large volume hand injection syringe as per the usual protocol. This be done with particular attention to avoid air in the closed system. In addition to supine, there is also an option that the patient's distal limb may be elevated to improve the flow of CO2 during injection. The surgeon will also wait at least 2 minutes between each CO2 injection to allow any potentially trapped CO2 to dissolve. A range of 20-60 ml will be used with each hand injection based on the data from the initial 5-10 pilot patients. Intervention protocol will be followed per Cross-Reference Intervention.

PROCEDUREHeparinized Normal Saline Injection

Media #4: Heparinized Normal Saline (Heparin NS) will be hand injected using 20 mL (2 U/mL) in antegrade fashion.

Sponsors

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age greater than or equal to 18 years * English speaking * Scheduled to undergo an infrainguinal angiogram and/or endovascular procedure as determined by a vascular surgery specialist * Superficial Femoral Artery diseased segment

Exclusion criteria

* Acute or Chronic Renal insufficiency with Cr \>1.5 * Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease * Congestive heart failure (American Heart Association C lass III or IV) * Acute limb ischemia, defined by a significant change in symptoms (one category on the Rutherford scale within the previous 14 days) * Concurrent oral anticoagulant therapy that cannot be safely withheld

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Images1 monthThe metric of image quality was the clear imaging field (CIF), which was defined as a cross section in which ≥270° of the vessel wall architecture was visualized. This has been used previously to quantify adequacy of clearance in OCT image comparison. Two independent observers, blinded to the flush medium used, analyzed all OCT frames in each pullback sequence. Any disagreement \>10% was resolved with a consensus re-evaluation at a later time point by the same reviewers. Each individual cross section was assigned a designation of quality or insufficient quality; thus, a quality image proportion was generated for each run by taking the mean of each observer's determinations

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Superficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush Medium1 month

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were eligible for the study if they were undergoing elective diagnostic angiography for femoropopliteal occlusive disease as indicated by preoperative segmental pressure recordings in an accredited vascular laboratory.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
iOCT
Arterial access will performed by the operating surgeon. An aortic and infrainguinal angiogram using the standard method of intravenous iodinated contrast under digital subtraction fluoroscopy will be conducted in the usual manner according to the vascular surgeon. A 54 mm section of Superficial Femoral Artery will be chosen for study imaging. An intervention sheath or injection catheter will be placed just proximal to the area of interest. An 0.014 wire will be passed distal to the area of interest. The patient will then undergo OCT of this 54mm section with each of the three mediums below using a continuous flushing method through injection catheter. All OCT imaging will be collected at a rate of 25mm/sec. In the event of a subsequent procedure, OCT imaging will again be performed
23
Total23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristiciOCT
Age, Continuous68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Blood Pressure
Diastolic BP
70 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Blood Pressure
Systolic BP
140 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24
Diabetes13 Participants
Heart Rate68 beats/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Hyperlipidemia18 Participants
Lumen Diameter3.99 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.99
Pre-Intervention Serum Creatinine1.03 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.25
Region of Enrollment
United States
23 participants
Rutherford Category 1-39 Participants
Rutherford Category 4-513 Participants
Rutherford Class Unknown1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants
Smoking History (>20 Years)20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 230 / 230 / 230 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 230 / 230 / 230 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 230 / 230 / 230 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Quality of Images

The metric of image quality was the clear imaging field (CIF), which was defined as a cross section in which ≥270° of the vessel wall architecture was visualized. This has been used previously to quantify adequacy of clearance in OCT image comparison. Two independent observers, blinded to the flush medium used, analyzed all OCT frames in each pullback sequence. Any disagreement \>10% was resolved with a consensus re-evaluation at a later time point by the same reviewers. Each individual cross section was assigned a designation of quality or insufficient quality; thus, a quality image proportion was generated for each run by taking the mean of each observer's determinations

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Contrast InjectionQuality of Images.702 Clear imaging field (CIF) proportionStandard Deviation 0.305
Dextran InjectionQuality of Images.872 Clear imaging field (CIF) proportionStandard Deviation 0.12
CO2 InjectionQuality of Images.10 Clear imaging field (CIF) proportionStandard Deviation 0.104
Heparinized SalineQuality of Images.743 Clear imaging field (CIF) proportionStandard Deviation 0.248
Secondary

Superficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush Medium

Time frame: 1 month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Contrast InjectionSuperficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush MediumFibrotic, %57.9 percentage of plaque composition
Contrast InjectionSuperficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush MediumNormal, %24.4 percentage of plaque composition
Contrast InjectionSuperficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush MediumCalcific, %6.9 percentage of plaque composition
Contrast InjectionSuperficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush MediumLipid, %9.1 percentage of plaque composition
Dextran InjectionSuperficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush MediumCalcific, %5.5 percentage of plaque composition
Dextran InjectionSuperficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush MediumFibrotic, %62.1 percentage of plaque composition
Dextran InjectionSuperficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush MediumLipid, %6.3 percentage of plaque composition
Dextran InjectionSuperficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush MediumNormal, %25.6 percentage of plaque composition
CO2 InjectionSuperficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush MediumCalcific, %5.4 percentage of plaque composition
CO2 InjectionSuperficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush MediumLipid, %6.5 percentage of plaque composition
CO2 InjectionSuperficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush MediumFibrotic, %63.0 percentage of plaque composition
CO2 InjectionSuperficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush MediumNormal, %22.9 percentage of plaque composition
Heparinized SalineSuperficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush MediumFibrotic, %61.0 percentage of plaque composition
Heparinized SalineSuperficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush MediumLipid, %7.3 percentage of plaque composition
Heparinized SalineSuperficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush MediumNormal, %24.3 percentage of plaque composition
Heparinized SalineSuperficial Femoral Artery Plaque Composition by Flush MediumCalcific, %6.0 percentage of plaque composition

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026