Skip to content

CP-690,550 Thorough QTc Study

A PHASE 1, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO- AND POSITIVE-CONTROLLED CROSS-OVER STUDY TO DETERMINE THE EFFECT OF SINGLE-DOSE CP-690,550 ON QTC INTERVAL IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01743677
Enrollment
60
Registered
2012-12-06
Start date
2007-10-26
Completion date
2008-02-09
Last updated
2020-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

TQT study, CP-690, 550

Brief summary

ICH E14 recommends that a thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study should be performed to determine whether intensive monitoring of QT interval in target patient populations is required during later stages of development. The current study is designed to ascertain whether CP-690,550 is associated with QTc prolongation.

Detailed description

The current study is designed to ascertain whether CP-690,550 is associated with QTc prolongation

Interventions

DRUGCP-690,550

Single dose 100 mg (5 x 20 mg tablets)

DRUGPlacebo

Single dose placebo tablets (5 tablets)

DRUGMoxifloxacin

Single dose Avelox 400 mg tablet

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy male and/or female subjects between ages of 18 and 55 years, inclusive. * Body Mass Index (BMI) of approximately 18 to 30 kg/m2; and a total body weight \>50 kg (110 lbs).

Exclusion criteria

* Use of tobacco- or nicotine-containing products in excess of equivalent of 5 cigarettes per day. * 12-lead ECG demonstrating QTc \>450 msec or other clinically significant abnormalities at Screening. * History of risk factors for QT prolongation or torsades de pointes. * Pregnant or nursing women; women of childbearing potential unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method of nonhormonal contraception from at least 14 days prior to first dose until completion of follow-up. * Use of prescription or nonprescription drugs, vitamins and dietary supplements within 7 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to first dose of trial medication. * Any clinically significant infections within past 3 months or evidence of infection in past 7 days.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 8 Hours Post-Dose8 hours post-doseTriplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 0.25 Hour Post-Dose0.25 hour post-doseTriplicate 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The time corresponding to the beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as Least Squares (LS) mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 0.5 Hour Post-Dose0.5 hour post-doseTriplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 1 Hour Post-Dose1 hour post-doseTriplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 2 Hours Post-Dose2 hours post-doseTriplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 4 Hours Post-Dose4 hours post-doseTriplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 12 Hours Post-Dose12 hours post-doseTriplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 16 Hours Post-Dose16 hours post-doseTriplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 24 Hours Post-Dose24 hours post-doseTriplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-doseVariation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. Cmax categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of CP-690,5500 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dosePlasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. t1/2 categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-doseVariation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. Tmax categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for CP-690,5500 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of CP-690,5500 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dosePlasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration of drug to decrease by one half.
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between Moxifloxacin Compared to Placebo2 hours post-doseTriplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (moxifloxacin minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours post-doseTriplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Bazett's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] for CP-690,5500 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-doseAUC (0 - ∞)= Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞). It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞).
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for CP-690,5500 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-doseArea under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast).
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] of CP-690,550 by Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) Genotype0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-doseAUC (0 - ∞)= Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞). It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞). Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. AUC (0 - ∞) categorized by genotype into poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-doseArea under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast). Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. AUClast categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.

Countries

Belgium, Singapore

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Entire Study Population
Includes participants randomized to receive any treatment (CP-690,550 100 mg first, moxifloxacin 400 mg first, or placebo first).
60
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEntire Study Population
Age, Continuous32.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
32 / 606 / 6010 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 600 / 600 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 0.25 Hour Post-Dose

Triplicate 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The time corresponding to the beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as Least Squares (LS) mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Time frame: 0.25 hour post-dose

Population: ECG analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 post-dose ECG measurement in at least 1 period of the crossover.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 0.25 Hour Post-Dose416.48 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 0.8823
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 0.25 Hour Post-Dose417.77 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 0.8823
90% CI: [-3.15, 0.56]
Primary

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 0.5 Hour Post-Dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Time frame: 0.5 hour post-dose

Population: ECG analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 post-dose ECG measurement in at least 1 period of the crossover.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 0.5 Hour Post-Dose414.70 msecStandard Error 0.8823
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 0.5 Hour Post-Dose416.12 msecStandard Error 0.8823
90% CI: [-3.28, 0.43]
Primary

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 12 Hours Post-Dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Time frame: 12 hours post-dose

Population: ECG analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 post-dose ECG measurement in at least 1 period of the crossover.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 12 Hours Post-Dose411.39 msecStandard Error 0.8823
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 12 Hours Post-Dose410.24 msecStandard Error 0.8823
90% CI: [-0.71, 3]
Primary

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 16 Hours Post-Dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Time frame: 16 hours post-dose

Population: ECG analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 post-dose ECG measurement in at least 1 period of the crossover.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 16 Hours Post-Dose415.87 msecStandard Error 0.8823
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 16 Hours Post-Dose413.72 msecStandard Error 0.8823
90% CI: [0.29, 4]
Primary

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 1 Hour Post-Dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Time frame: 1 hour post-dose

Population: ECG analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 post-dose ECG measurement in at least 1 period of the crossover.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 1 Hour Post-Dose414.69 msecStandard Error 0.8823
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 1 Hour Post-Dose416.98 msecStandard Error 0.8823
90% CI: [-4.15, -0.44]
Primary

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 24 Hours Post-Dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Time frame: 24 hours post-dose

Population: ECG analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 post-dose ECG measurement in at least 1 period of the crossover.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 24 Hours Post-Dose412.53 msecStandard Error 0.8823
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 24 Hours Post-Dose411.18 msecStandard Error 0.8823
90% CI: [-0.5, 3.21]
Primary

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 2 Hours Post-Dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Time frame: 2 hours post-dose

Population: ECG analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 post-dose ECG measurement in at least 1 period of the crossover.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 2 Hours Post-Dose413.70 msecStandard Error 0.8823
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 2 Hours Post-Dose415.05 msecStandard Error 0.8823
90% CI: [-3.21, 0.5]
Primary

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 4 Hours Post-Dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Time frame: 4 hours post-dose

Population: ECG analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 post-dose ECG measurement in at least 1 period of the crossover.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 4 Hours Post-Dose416.83 msecStandard Error 0.8823
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 4 Hours Post-Dose415.76 msecStandard Error 0.8823
90% CI: [-0.78, 2.93]
Primary

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 8 Hours Post-Dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Time frame: 8 hours post-dose

Population: ECG analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 post-dose ECG measurement in at least 1 period of the crossover.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 8 Hours Post-Dose409.25 msecStandard Error 0.8823
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 8 Hours Post-Dose408.39 msecStandard Error 0.8823
90% CI: [-1, 2.71]
Secondary

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] for CP-690,550

AUC (0 - ∞)= Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞). It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞).

Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgArea Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] for CP-690,5502682.6 nanogram*hour/milliliter (ng*hr/mL)Standard Deviation 778.15
Secondary

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] of CP-690,550 by Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) Genotype

AUC (0 - ∞)= Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞). It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞). Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. AUC (0 - ∞) categorized by genotype into poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.

Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Population: PK parameter analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period. Here 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable in each specific category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgArea Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] of CP-690,550 by Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) GenotypeUltra Extensive Metabolizer1677.7 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 637.68
CP-690,550 100 mgArea Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] of CP-690,550 by Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) GenotypePoor Metabolizer3127.5 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 373.18
CP-690,550 100 mgArea Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] of CP-690,550 by Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) GenotypeExtensive Metabolizer2683.5 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 787.75
Secondary

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for CP-690,550

Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast).

Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Population: PK parameter analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgArea Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for CP-690,5502669.7 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 771.02
Secondary

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype

Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast). Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. AUClast categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.

Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Population: PK parameter analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period. Here 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable in each specific category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgArea Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 GenotypeUltra Extensive Metabolizer1673.1 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 636.3
CP-690,550 100 mgArea Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 GenotypePoor Metabolizer3114.3 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 366.68
CP-690,550 100 mgArea Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 GenotypeExtensive Metabolizer2670.2 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 780.41
Secondary

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of CP-690,550

Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Population: PK parameter analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of CP-690,550563.5 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 199.23
Secondary

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype

Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. Cmax categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.

Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Population: PK parameter analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period. Here 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable in each specific category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 GenotypePoor Metabolizer647.4 ng/mLStandard Deviation 281.69
CP-690,550 100 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 GenotypeExtensive Metabolizer565.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 185.62
CP-690,550 100 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 GenotypeUltra Extensive Metabolizer346.9 ng/mLStandard Deviation 214.25
Secondary

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Bazett's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Time frame: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours post-dose

Population: ECG analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 post-dose ECG measurement in at least 1 period of the crossover.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo2 Hours Post-Dose414.54 msecStandard Error 1.1139
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo16 Hours Post-Dose416.44 msecStandard Error 1.1139
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo4 Hours Post-Dose417.26 msecStandard Error 1.1139
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo0.25 Hour Post-Dose416.40 msecStandard Error 1.1139
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo8 Hours Post-Dose412.91 msecStandard Error 1.1139
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo0.5 Hour Post-Dose416.69 msecStandard Error 1.1139
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo12 Hours Post-Dose416.76 msecStandard Error 1.1139
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo24 Hours Post-Dose413.93 msecStandard Error 1.1139
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo1 Hour Post-Dose417.98 msecStandard Error 1.1139
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo24 Hours Post-Dose413.14 msecStandard Error 1.1139
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo1 Hour Post-Dose414.99 msecStandard Error 1.1139
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo8 Hours Post-Dose412.86 msecStandard Error 1.1139
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo0.5 Hour Post-Dose414.91 msecStandard Error 1.1139
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo2 Hours Post-Dose413.46 msecStandard Error 1.1139
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo4 Hours Post-Dose415.10 msecStandard Error 1.1139
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo12 Hours Post-Dose416.27 msecStandard Error 1.1139
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo16 Hours Post-Dose414.33 msecStandard Error 1.1139
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo0.25 Hour Post-Dose416.24 msecStandard Error 1.1139
Comparison: 0.25 hour post-dose90% CI: [-2.11, 2.44]
Comparison: 0.5 hour post-dose90% CI: [-0.49, 4.06]
Comparison: 1 hour post-dose90% CI: [0.71, 5.26]
Comparison: 2 hours post-dose90% CI: [-1.19, 3.36]
Comparison: 4 hours post-dose90% CI: [-0.11, 4.44]
Comparison: 8 hours post-dose90% CI: [-2.22, 2.33]
Comparison: 12 hours post-dose90% CI: [-1.79, 2.76]
Comparison: 16 hours post-dose90% CI: [-0.17, 4.38]
Comparison: 24 hours post-dose90% CI: [-1.49, 3.06]
Secondary

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between Moxifloxacin Compared to Placebo

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (moxifloxacin minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Time frame: 2 hours post-dose

Population: ECG analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 post-dose ECG measurement in at least 1 period of the crossover.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between Moxifloxacin Compared to Placebo426.34 msecStandard Error 0.8823
PlaceboMean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between Moxifloxacin Compared to Placebo415.05 msecStandard Error 0.8823
90% CI: [9.62, 12.96]
Secondary

Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of CP-690,550

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration of drug to decrease by one half.

Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Population: PK parameter analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgPlasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of CP-690,5503.284 hoursStandard Deviation 0.4871
Secondary

Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. t1/2 categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.

Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Population: PK parameter analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period. Here 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable in each specific category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CP-690,550 100 mgPlasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 GenotypePoor Metabolizer3.005 hoursStandard Deviation 0.3566
CP-690,550 100 mgPlasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 GenotypeExtensive Metabolizer3.320 hoursStandard Deviation 0.5006
CP-690,550 100 mgPlasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 GenotypeUltra Extensive Metabolizer3.201 hoursStandard Deviation 0.1821
Secondary

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for CP-690,550

Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Population: PK parameter analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CP-690,550 100 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for CP-690,5501.000 hours
Secondary

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype

Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. Tmax categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.

Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Population: PK parameter analysis set included all randomized and treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period. Here 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable in each specific category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
CP-690,550 100 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 GenotypeUltra Extensive Metabolizer2.000 hours
CP-690,550 100 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 GenotypePoor Metabolizer0.500 hours
CP-690,550 100 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 GenotypeExtensive Metabolizer1.000 hours

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026