Skip to content

Testing Resources: Manual and Webinar Guided Treatment vs. Manual Guided Treatment

Meeting the Unique Treatment Needs of Female Gamblers: A Workbook and Webinar Effectiveness Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01743092
Enrollment
59
Registered
2012-12-06
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2016-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pathological Gambling

Keywords

Pathological gambling, treatment, online counselling, webinar, workbook

Brief summary

Research specific to women's gambling treatment needs is limited but suggests a critical need for women sensitive options and reduced barriers to access. This pilot will test the effectiveness of a Tutorial Workbook (TW) both as a self-help tool and used in combination with a webinar. Ontario women(n=48) over the age of 19, with gambling concerns, will be recruited through flyers, on-line and newspaper ads and randomly assigned to one of two groups: (a) TW or (b) TWW (TW plus Webinar). All will complete questionnaires addressing gambling behaviours, personal history and mood states prior to and after the 12 week study. Groups (a) and (b) will also provide feedback on the TW's content and relevance. Group (b) will, in addition, provide feedback on the Webinar Group. TW and TWW will be valuable additions to current treatments, of special importance to reduce barriers for women. The study will contribute to best practices in developing web-based treatments.

Detailed description

Most gambling specific research involves men yet findings are typically generalized to women, a shortcoming addressed in the literature. Women are underrepresented in treatment. A previous study (Boughton and Brewster, 2002) with 365 Ontario women not in treatment, explored barriers and treatment needs. Many respondents indicated that women-only groups and self-help materials would be of value. Using web-based resources to increase treatment options has merit in a growing technological age. This study will introduce two unique forms of treatment, a women friendly tutorial workbook developed specifically to address issues commonly underlying women's gambling and a webinar based group facilitated by a gambling clinician. Group support has been demonstrated to be highly beneficial for women in reducing isolation and shame. The research will assist in developing Best Practices in the problem gambling field, especially for women, a neglected and vulnerable group. There are two questions: 1. First, to what extent is the Tutorial Workbook effective by itself as a treatment option in helping women make changes to their gambling. 2. What extent is the addition of the webinar discussion group option an incremental benefit to the participant in helping women make changes to their gambling. Web based therapy has proven effective in the treatment of addiction and mental health issues but more research is needed to assess its efficacy for problem gambling. Self-help tools have been demonstrated as effective in reducing gambling but no women specific tools are available. Evidence of the effectiveness of the TW and TWW treatment options will reduce barriers for hard to serve populations of women and expand options for clinical programs to meet the needs of women unable to attend face to face programs. The TW attends to the unique issues and treatment/support needs of women with gambling concerns. Ultimately the TW materials, once fully developed, can be made available to the general public as an online tool, used to assist n providing telephone counselling, individually or in a group (Webinar) format or be made available as a self-help paper based utorial workbook.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALWebinar

Some clients will receive a webinar as part of their treatment.

BEHAVIORALTutuorial workbook

A work book about their addiciton

Sponsors

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* pathological gamblers * not currently in formal gambling specific treatment * English proficiency (reading, writing and speech) * access to private computer and phone * sufficient computer skills to engage in webinar * able to fully commit to time demands of weekly participation

Exclusion criteria

* active psychosis * unstable mood disorders * emotion dysregulation * extreme social anxiety * cognitive challenges in reading * not proficient in in English (reading, writing and speech) * suicidal behaviours * current problems with drugs/ alcohol abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceived Stress Scale12 weeksThe questionnaire asks the client about their perceived stress. The Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., and Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 386-396. December 1983) is a scale developed to measure the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful. Psychological stress has been defined as the extent to which persons perceive (appraise) that their demands exceed their ability to cope. The PSS has become one of the most widely used psychological instruments for measuring nonspecific perceived stress. The scale has ten questions asking respondents to circle a number between 0 and 4. (0 the feelings and thoughts during the last month: 0 = Never 1 = Almost Never 2 = Sometimes 3 = Fairly Often 4 = Very Often. The range of possible score is from 0 to 40. Scores around 13 are considered average. Scores of 20 or higher are considered to be indicative of high stress levels.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DASS Depression12 weeksThe Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS 21) is a 21 item self-report questionnaire developed by Lovibond, S.H. & Lovibond, P.F. (1995, Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, 2nd. Ed., Sydney: Psychology Foundation). The range of total scores for each subscale is from 0 to 21. Higher values represent a worse outcome. Depression Normal 0-4 Mild 5-6 Moderate 7-10 Severe 11-13 Extremely Severe 14+ Anxiety Normal 0-3 Mild 4-5 Moderate 6-7 Severe 8-9 Extremely Severe 10+ Stress Normal 0-7 Mild 8-9 Moderate 10-12 Severe 13-16 Extremely Severe 17+

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tutorial Workbook
Tutorial Workbook Group only receives a Tutorial Workbook Group Tutuorial workbook: A work book about their addiciton
33
Tutorial Workbook Group Plus Webinar
Tutorial Workbook Group plus webinar will receive in addition, a webinar as an additional resource. Webinar: Some clients will receive a webinar as part of their treatment. Tutuorial workbook: A work book about their addiciton
26
Total59

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1415

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTutorial WorkbookTutorial Workbook Group Plus WebinarTotal
Age, Continuous51 years56 years53 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
other
11 participants4 participants15 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
white / european
22 participants22 participants44 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
33 participants26 participants59 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants26 Participants59 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 330 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 330 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Perceived Stress Scale

The questionnaire asks the client about their perceived stress. The Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., and Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 386-396. December 1983) is a scale developed to measure the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful. Psychological stress has been defined as the extent to which persons perceive (appraise) that their demands exceed their ability to cope. The PSS has become one of the most widely used psychological instruments for measuring nonspecific perceived stress. The scale has ten questions asking respondents to circle a number between 0 and 4. (0 the feelings and thoughts during the last month: 0 = Never 1 = Almost Never 2 = Sometimes 3 = Fairly Often 4 = Very Often. The range of possible score is from 0 to 40. Scores around 13 are considered average. Scores of 20 or higher are considered to be indicative of high stress levels.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The number of data points in this analysis equals the number who completed the study, minus 2. There were 2 missing data points in this analysis because two people did not complete the questionnaire.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tutorial WorkbookPerceived Stress Scale15.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Tutorial Workbook Group Plus WebinarPerceived Stress Scale14.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Secondary

DASS Depression

The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS 21) is a 21 item self-report questionnaire developed by Lovibond, S.H. & Lovibond, P.F. (1995, Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, 2nd. Ed., Sydney: Psychology Foundation). The range of total scores for each subscale is from 0 to 21. Higher values represent a worse outcome. Depression Normal 0-4 Mild 5-6 Moderate 7-10 Severe 11-13 Extremely Severe 14+ Anxiety Normal 0-3 Mild 4-5 Moderate 6-7 Severe 8-9 Extremely Severe 10+ Stress Normal 0-7 Mild 8-9 Moderate 10-12 Severe 13-16 Extremely Severe 17+

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The number of data points in this analysis equals the number who completed the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tutorial WorkbookDASS Depressiondepression4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Tutorial WorkbookDASS Depressionanxiety3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
Tutorial WorkbookDASS DepressionStress3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Tutorial Workbook Group Plus WebinarDASS Depressiondepression3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Tutorial Workbook Group Plus WebinarDASS Depressionanxiety2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Tutorial Workbook Group Plus WebinarDASS DepressionStress5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026