Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of the CADence Device in Detection of Coronary Artery Diseases

Pivotal Study of the CADence Device in Detection of Coronary Artery Diseases

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01743040
Acronym
TURBULENCE
Enrollment
1014
Registered
2012-12-06
Start date
2013-06-14
Completion date
2016-02-10
Last updated
2020-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Coronary Artery Disease, Nuclear Stress Test, CT Angiography, Angiography, CADence

Brief summary

This is a multi-center, prospective, non-randomized, double-blinded trial to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the CADence device in detecting the existence of clinically significant coronary artery disease as determined by either standard or CT angiography.

Detailed description

This is a multi-center, prospective, non-randomized, double-blinded, trial to evaluate the performance of the CADence in detecting the existence of at least one major coronary artery with clinically significant stenosis in a subject is defined as the presence of at least one lesion with ≥ 70% diameter stenosis anywhere in the proximal Left anterior Descending, mid Left anterior Descending, proximal Left Circumflex, mid Left Circumflex , proximal Right Coronary Artery, mid Right Coronary Artery, distal Right Coronary Artery and Obtuse Margin 1, Obtuse Margin 2, and Ramus Intermedius if segment diameter \>2.5 mm or ≥50% diameter stenosis in the Left Main coronary arteries. Consented subjects will be evaluated with the CADence device and then undergo nuclear stress testing followed by either computed tomography or standard coronary angiography. The maximum expected timeframe between CADence and computed tomography Angiography or standard angiography is 6 weeks. This is a double-blinded study. All physicians and subjects will be masked to the diagnostic results of the CADence until completion of CADence, nuclear stress, computed tomography or standard coronary angiogram testing for the subjects. Patient care will not be based on the CADence results. Study participation will conclude after the computed tomography angiography or standard coronary angiography procedure. computed tomograph or standard coronary angiography are considered acceptable clinical reference standards in this study and are gold standards for detection of coronary artery disease. The experimental unit of this study is the subject. Existence of clinically significant coronary artery disease in a subject is defined as the presence of at least one lesion with ≥ 70% diameter stenosis anywhere in the proximal Left anterior Descending, mid Left anterior Descending, proximal Left Circumflex, mid Left Circumflex, proximal Right Coronary Artery, mid Right Coronary Artery, distal Right Coronary Artery and Obtuse Margin 1, Obtuse Margin 2, and Ramus Intermedius if segment diameter \>2.5 mm or ≥50% diameter stenosis in the Left Main coronary arteries. The study required sample size is 826 but may enroll up to 1,300 subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of the CADence are expected to be 80% and 73% respectively. Observed sensitivity and specificity will be compared to nuclear stress literature-based performance standards of 83% and 80% respectively using one sample non-inferiority binomial tests with a non-inferiority margin of 15 percentage points. Sample size requirements are 109 subjects with the presence of at least one lesion with ≥ ≥ 70% diameter stenosis anywhere in the proximal Left anterior Descending, mid Left anterior Descending, proximal Left Circumflex, mid Left Circumflex, proximal Right Coronary Artery, mid Right Coronary Artery, distal Right Coronary Artery and Obtuse Margin 1, Obtuse Margin 2, and Ramus Intermedius if segment diameter \>2.5 mm or ≥50% diameter stenosis in the Left MAIN coronary arteries. to test the sensitivity hypothesis and 268 subjects without the presence of at least one lesion with ≥ 70% diameter stenosis anywhere in the proximal Left anterior Descending, mid Left anterior Descending, proximal Left Circumflex, mid Left Circumflex, proximal Right Coronary Artery, mid Right Coronary Artery, distal Right Coronary Artery and Obtuse Margin 1, Obtuse Margin 2, and Ramus Intermedius if segment diameter \>2.5 mm or ≥50% diameter stenosis in the Left MAIN coronary arteries. to test the specificity hypothesis. It was assumed that 15 percent of enrolled subjects would be found to have the presence of at least one lesion with ≥ 70% diameter stenosis anywhere in the proximal Left anterior Descending, mid Left anterior Descending, proximal Left Circumflex, mid Left Circumflex, proximal Right Coronary Artery, mid Right Coronary Artery, distal Right Coronary Artery and Obtuse Margin 1, Obtuse Margin 2, and Ramus Intermedius if segment diameter \>2.5 mm or ≥50% diameter stenosis in the Left Main coronary arteries. In order to accrue 109 subjects with significant Coronary Artery Disease as defined in the protocol, 826 subjects must be enrolled. Sample sizes provide 85% power with alpha of 0.05 for each statistical test.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCADence

Patients with chest pain and two or more coronary risk factors and who were already indicated for nuclear stress test were enrolled in the study. The CADence was performed prior to nuclear stress test. Patients underwent standard angiogram based upon normal clinical judgement. In all other patients a CT angiogram followed. CADence is a handheld equipped with acoustic sensor technology, a patient booklet, remote algorithm and final report.

Sponsors

AUM Cardiovascular, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects clinically indicated for nuclear stress test and who satisfy all the inclusion and

Exclusion criteria

are eligible for participation. Inclusion criteria: Age 22 years or older Willing and able to give informed consent Clinical indication for nuclear stress test evaluation Chest pain syndrome Two or more coronary artery disease risk factors as defined by: 1. Dyslipidemia: low-density lipoprotein (LDL) \>130 mm/dL or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) \<35 mm/dL or on treatment for dyslipidemia 2. Hypertension: blood pressure \>140 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) systolic, \>90 mmHg diastolic or on blood pressure altering treatment 3. Obesity: body mass index (BMI)\>28 4. Current cigarette smoking 5. Diabetes: Type 1 or 2 6. Family history: coronary disease in a first or second degree relative

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity and Specificity of CADence to Detect Stenosis Relative to SPECT Performance, Using Either CT or Standard Angiogram as the Gold StandardNo more than 3 weeks between CADence, SPECT and standard or CT angiogramThe CADence will be considered to have demonstrated effectiveness in detecting the presence of at least one lesion with ≥ 70% diameter stenosis anywhere in the proximal Left anterior Descending (pLAD), mid Left anterior Descending (mLAD), proximal Left Circumflex (pLCx), mid Left Circumflex (mLCx), proximal Right Coronary Artery (pRCA), mid Right Coronary Artery (mRCA), distal Right Coronary Artery (dRCA) and Obtuse Margin 1 (OM1), Obtuse Margin 2 (OM2), and Ramus Intermedius (RI) if segment diameter \>2.5 mm or ≥50% diameter stenosis in the Left Main coronary arteries if sensitivity and specificity are non-inferior within 15 percentage points to a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 80%, which is the literature-based Objective Performance Criteria (OPC) for nuclear stress tests.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment was held June 14, 2013 through February 10, 2016 at hospitals, clinics and research centers.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study
All patients enrolled in TURBULENCE study
1,011
Total1,011

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up66
Overall StudyPhysician Decision40
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject121

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Continuous59.14 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.65
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Asian
26 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Black or African American
116 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Caucasian
728 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
116 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Native American
7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Other
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
486 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
525 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1,014
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 1,014
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 1,014

Outcome results

Primary

Sensitivity and Specificity of CADence to Detect Stenosis Relative to SPECT Performance, Using Either CT or Standard Angiogram as the Gold Standard

The CADence will be considered to have demonstrated effectiveness in detecting the presence of at least one lesion with ≥ 70% diameter stenosis anywhere in the proximal Left anterior Descending (pLAD), mid Left anterior Descending (mLAD), proximal Left Circumflex (pLCx), mid Left Circumflex (mLCx), proximal Right Coronary Artery (pRCA), mid Right Coronary Artery (mRCA), distal Right Coronary Artery (dRCA) and Obtuse Margin 1 (OM1), Obtuse Margin 2 (OM2), and Ramus Intermedius (RI) if segment diameter \>2.5 mm or ≥50% diameter stenosis in the Left Main coronary arteries if sensitivity and specificity are non-inferior within 15 percentage points to a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 80%, which is the literature-based Objective Performance Criteria (OPC) for nuclear stress tests.

Time frame: No more than 3 weeks between CADence, SPECT and standard or CT angiogram

Population: Per protocol subjects who completed all required testing and had analyzable results. Both Sensitivity and Specificity were assessed in this study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Overall StudySensitivity and Specificity of CADence to Detect Stenosis Relative to SPECT Performance, Using Either CT or Standard Angiogram as the Gold StandardSensitivity78 percent
Overall StudySensitivity and Specificity of CADence to Detect Stenosis Relative to SPECT Performance, Using Either CT or Standard Angiogram as the Gold StandardSpecificity36 percent
Comparison: The goal was to test the Sensitivity and specificity of CADence as compared to SPECT nuclear stress test OPC. Both were measured and reported in this study. The Sensitivity of CADence was 78% (95% CI 76.1-90.8%) while the specificity was 36% (95% CI 32-39%).p-value: 0.012Exact binomial test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026