Skip to content

Ultrasound-guided Intermediate Cervical Block Versus Superficial Cervical Block for Carotid Endarterectomy (CERVECHO)

Ultrasound-guided Intermediate Cervical Block Versus Superficial Cervical Block for Carotid : a Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01742845
Acronym
CERVECHO
Enrollment
86
Registered
2012-12-06
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2012-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carotid Atherosclerosis, Regional Anaesthesia Morbidity

Keywords

Ultrasound-guided, regional anaesthesia, Cervical block

Brief summary

The aim of this prospective, randomised, controlled study is to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical block to superficial block for carotid endarterectomy. Patients scheduled for carotide endarterectomy under regional anaesthesia (ropivacaine 4.75 mg/ml) are randomised into 2 groups according to the technique of anaesthesia performed: superficial cervical block (Control group) or, ultrasound guided intermediate cervical block (Echo group). Main outcome is cervical block success, defined by surgery performed under regional anaesthesia without supplemental topical lidocaine. Secondary outcomes are rate of conversion to general anaesthesia, total dose of supplemental topical lidocaine and block-related complications.

Interventions

OTHERUltrasound-guided administration of ropivacaine 4.75 mg/ml
OTHERlandmark based superfical ropivacaine 4.75 mg/ml injection

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patient scheduled for elective carotid artery endarterectomy under regional anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* indication for general anaesthesia * known bleedind diathesis * past medical allergy to local anaesthesic * severe chronic pulmonary disease * contralateral diaphragmatic motion abnormalities * previous cervical ipsilateral surgery * age \< 18 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cervical block successsurgery timecarotid artery endarterectomy performed under regional anaesthesia without supplemental topical lidocaine.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
percentage of conversion to general anaesthesiasurgery timeconversion to general anaesthesia for insufficient analgesia

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
percentage of patient needing intraoperative systemic analgesia or sedationanaesthesia timeif patient related pain in spite of supplemental local anaesthesic. sedation/analgesia let to the discretion of the anesthesist in the operating room
amount of local anaesthesic used to performed the blocksurgery time
regional anaesthesia-related complications7 postoperative daysHorner syndrom, facial paralysis, cough, phrenic paralysis
surgery related complications7 postoperative dayshematoma, stroke, bleeding

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026