Skip to content

Comparison Study of Conventional POEM and Hybrid POEM for Esophageal Achalasia

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia: Randomized Comparison of Water-Jet Assisted Versus Conventional Dissection Technique

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01742494
Enrollment
100
Registered
2012-12-05
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2012-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Achalasia

Keywords

Esophageal Achalasia,, Peroral endoscopic myotomy,, Water-jet assisted

Brief summary

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has recently been introduced as promising alternative to laparoscopic Heller myotomy for patients with idiopathic achalasia. Several technical modifications have been proposed but have not yet been tested in randomized trials.

Detailed description

Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of water-jet assisted POEM (WJ) versus the conventional technique (C). Interventions: Patients with achalasia diagnosed by symptoms, endoscopy and barium swallow eligible for POEM were randomized to either the use of Erbe Hybrid knife (WJ group) or the conventional technique using injection and triangle tip knife interchangeably (C group). Main outcome measurements: Procedure time in both groups; secondary outcomes were clinical efficacy and safety (bleeding complications, pneumothorax or pleural effusion requiring intervention)

Interventions

PROCEDUREWater-jet POEM

Water-jet assisted POEM procedure was performed

POEM were performed by the use of conventional technique using injection and triangle tip knife.

Sponsors

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* With an Eckardt symptom score ≥ 4 * The diagnosis of achalasia was made on the basis of the absence of peristalsis and on impaired relaxation of the LES on established methods (barium swallow, manometry, esophagogastroduodenoscopy) * Informed patient consent was obtained

Exclusion criteria

* Severe cardiopulmonary disease or other serious disease leading to unacceptable surgical risk * Pseudoachalasia * Megaesophagus (diameter of \> 7 cm)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Procedure time in both groupsduring POEM procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
clinical efficacy and safetyduring hospital stay and up to 1 yearbleeding complications, pneumothorax or pleural effusion requiring intervention

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Therapeutic successEvery 3 months after innitial intervention via telephone questionnaires during follow-up up to 1 yeara reduction in the Eckardt score to ≤3

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactPing-Hong Zhou, M.D, PhD
zhou1968@yahoo.cn86-13681971063

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026