Skip to content

iFuse Implant System® Minimally Invasive Arthrodesis

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Post-market Clinical Follow-up Trial Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of the iFuse Implant System® Versus Conservative Management for Patients With Chronic, Disabling SI Joint Pain.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01741025
Acronym
iMIA
Enrollment
103
Registered
2012-12-04
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2017-09-24
Last updated
2017-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sacroiliac Joint Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes when patients with chronic sacroiliac joint pain undergo either SI joint fusion with the iFuse Implant System or undergo conservative management of the SI joint

Detailed description

This study is a multicenter randomized controlled, post-market clinical follow-up clinical trial of the iFuse Implant System for SI joint fusion vs. conservative management. Subjects assigned to conservative management may cross over to iFuse after a minimum of 6 months of conservative treatment. Conservative management does not include interventional procedures such as prolotherapy, steroid injections and/or RF ablation.

Interventions

Placement of iFuse implant system via surgery

Medications for pain, physical therapy, cognitive behavour therapy

Sponsors

SI-BONE, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 21-70 at time of screening 2. Patient has lower back pain for \>6 months or \>18 months for pregnancy induced lower back pain 3. Diagnosis of the SI joint as the primary lower back pain generator based on ALL of the following: a. Patient has pain at or close to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) with possible radiation into buttocks, posterior thigh or groin and can point with a single finger to the location of pain (Fortin Finger Test), and b. Patient has at least 3 of 5 physical examination maneuvers specific for SI joint pain, and c. Patient has improvement in lower back pain NRS of at least 50% of the pre injection NRS score after fluoroscopic controlled injection of local anesthetic into affected SI joint(s) (including previous documented test \<6 months ago) 4. Baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of at least 30% 5. Baseline lower back pain score of at least 50 on 0-100 point VAS 6. Patient has signed study-specific informed consent form 7. Patient has the necessary mental capacity to participate and is physically able to comply with study protocol requirements

Exclusion criteria

1. Severe lower back pain due to other causes, such as lumbar disc degeneration, lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spondylolisthesis, lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar facet degeneration, and lumbar vertebral body fracture 2. Sacroiliac pathology caused by auto-immune disease (e.g. ankylosing spondylitis) and/or neoplasia (e.g. benign or malignant tumor) and/or crystal arthropathy 3. History of recent (\<1 year) fracture of the pelvis with documented malunion, non-union of sacrum or ilium or any type of internal fixation of the pelvic ring. 4. Spine surgery during the past 12 months. 5. Previously diagnosed or suspected osteoporosis (defined as prior T-score \<-2.5 or history of osteoporotic fracture) 6. Documented osteomalacia or other metabolic bone disease 7. Any condition or anatomy that makes treatment with the iFuse Implant System infeasible 8. Known allergy to titanium or titanium alloys 9. Use of medications known to have detrimental effects on bone quality and soft-tissue healing 10. Prominent neurologic condition that would interfere with physical therapy 11. Current systemic infection or local infection at the SI joint 12. Currently pregnant or planning pregnancy in the next year 13. Known or suspected drug or alcohol abuse 14. Diagnosed psychiatric disease (e.g., schizophrenia, major depression, personality disorders) that could interfere with study participation 15. Patient is participating in an investigational study or has been involved in an investigational study within 3 months of surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The change in lower back pain as rated by the study subject using a 0-100 visual analog scale (VAS) at 6 months after initiation of treatment6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline in lower back pain (VAS)1, 3, 12 and 24 months
Change from baseline in leg pain (VAS1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in disability due to back pain (ODI3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in quality of life (EQ-5D3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in ambulatory and work status1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in objective functional test (ASLR3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Change in walking distance3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Patient satisfaction and self-rating of disease state3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Serious adverse eventsduring 24 months
Device breakage, loosening and migration12 months
Change in depression score (Zung Depression Scale3, 6, 12 and 24 months

Other

MeasureTime frame
Surgical re-interventions of target SI joint(s)over 24 months

Countries

Belgium, Germany, Italy, Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026