Breast Neoplasms
Conditions
Keywords
breast cancer, postmenopausal women, estrogen-receptor positive, HER2 negative, locoregionally recurrent, metastatic, Palbociclib (PD-0332991), PALOMA-2
Brief summary
The study is designed to compare the clinical benefit following treatment with letrozole in combination with PD-0332991 versus letrozole in combination with placebo in postmenopausal women with ER(+)/HER2(-) advanced breast cancer who have not received prior systemic anti cancer therapies for their advanced/metastatic disease.
Interventions
PD-0332991, 125mg, orally once daily on Day 1 to Day 21 of every 28-day cycle followed by 7 days off treatment
Letrozole, 2.5mg, orally once daily (continuously)
Placebo, 125mg, orally once daily on Day 1 to Day 21 of every 28-day cycle followed by 7 days off treatment
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult women with locoregionally recurrent or metastatic disease not amenable to curative therapy. * Confirmed diagnosis of ER positive breast cancer * No prior systemic anti-cancer therapy for advanced ER+ disease. * Postmenopausal women * Measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criterion in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] or bone-only disease * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group \[ECOG\] 0-2 * Adequate organ and marrow function * Patient must agree to provide tumor tissue
Exclusion criteria
* Confirmed diagnosis of HER2 positive disease * Patients with advanced, symptomatic, visceral spread that are at risk of life threatening complication in the short term * Known uncontrolled or symptomatic CNS metastases * Prior (neo)adjuvant treatment with letrozole or anastrozole with DFI ≤ 12-months from completion of treatment. * Prior treatment with any CDK 4/6 inhibitor.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator | From randomization date to date of first documentation of progression or death (up to approximately 2.5 years) | PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) or death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data include more than 1 date, the first date will be used. PFS (in months) will be calculated as (first event date - randomization date +1)/30.4. Progression is defined using RECIST v1.1, as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Response: Participants With Measurable Disease at Baseline as Assessed by the Investigator | From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years) | The OR is defined as the overall CR or PR according to the RECIST v1.1. ORR is defined as proportion of participants with CR or PR relative to all randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, or who died, progressed/ dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the assessment of ORR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10mm). PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression. |
| Duration of Response (DR) | From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years) | DR is defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date will be used. DR was calculated as \[the date response ended (i.e. date of PD or death) - first CR or PR date + 1)\]/30.4. DR would only be calculated for the subgroup of participants with an objective tumor response. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10mm). PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression. |
| Disease Control (DC)/Clinical Benefit Response (CBR) | From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years) | DC is defined as overall CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) \>=24 weeks according to RECIST version 1.1. Disease Control Rate (DCR) is defined as participants with CR, PR, or SD \>=24 weeks relative to all randomized participants. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor reevaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, a best response of SD\>=24 weeks, or who died, progressed, or dropped out for any reason prior to achieving reaching a CR or PR and a best response of SD\>=24 weeks was counted as non-responders in DCR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10mm). PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression. |
| PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 24 Months) | PFS by biomarker status by Investigator assessment. Progression is defined using RECIST v1.1, as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Positive is defined as H-Score \>=1 and negative as H-Score \<1. H-Score is calculated as the sum of the % of cells at each level of staining intensity (0, 1+, 2+, and 3+) multiplied by the staining intensity value: H-Score = (% at 0)\*0 + (% at 1+)\*1 + (% at 2+)\*2 + (% at 3+)\*3. H-Score values range from 0 to 300. ER stands for estrogen receptor and Rb stands for retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product. |
| Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | Time-matched triplicate ECGs were collected at 0 (predose), 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours on Day 0 and on Cycle1 Day14 | Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and sent to a central laboratory for blinded manual adjudication. The average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR), by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR) and corrected QT interval according to study-specific criteria (QTcS). Time-matched change from baseline values were reported for QTc analysis population. |
| Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | For safety monitoring triplicate ECGs were obtained at 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 1 of Cycle 1, Day 14 of Cycles 1 and Cycle 2, then on Day 1 of Cycles 4, 7, and 10 (ECGs beyond Cycle 10 were performed as clinically indicated) | Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and sent to a central laboratory for blinded manual adjudication. The average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR), by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR) and corrected QT interval according to study-specific criteria (QTcS). Percentage of participants with post-baseline maximum absolute values and maximum increase from baseline were summarized for the safety analysis population. |
| Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) at Steady-State | 0 hour (predose) on Day 14 of cycles 1 and 2 | Summary of plasma palbociclib within-participant mean steady-state trough concentrations. |
| Objective Response as Assessed by the Investigator | From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years) | Objective Response (OR) defined as overall complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST v1.1. Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as proportion of participants with CR or PR relative to all randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, or who died, progressed/ dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in assessment of ORR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10mm). PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression. |
| Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) | From Baseline up to 2.5 years | FACT is a modular approach to assess participant health-related quality of life using a 'core' set of questions (FACT-G) as well as a cancer site-specific module. The FACT-G is a 27-item compilation of general questions divided into 4 domains: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, and Functional Well-Being. The FACT-B consisted of the FACT-G (27-item) and a breast-specific module: a 10-item instrument designed to assess participant concerns relating to breast cancer. For all questions, participants were asked to respond to a five-level scale where 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. FACT-B total score = Physical Well-Being + Social/Family Well-Being + Emotional Well-Being + Functional Well-Being + Breast Cancer Subscale. As each of the items ranges from 0-4, the range of possible scores is 0-144, with 0 being the worst possible score and 144 the best. |
| Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | From date of randomization up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (final analysis till study completion, approximately up to 10.51 years) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life-threatening; required hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE were events that occurred between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Severity was graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 4.0 as Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening and Grade 5 = death related to AE. Discontinuation included permanent, temporary discontinuation and dose reduction due to AEs. |
| Overall Survival (OS): Primary Analysis | From date of randomization until death due to any cause or censored, (assessed up to data cut-off date of 15-Nov-2021, approximately 8.7 years) | OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Participants without survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up were censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Data for this outcome measure was reported at primary analysis. |
| Overall Survival (OS): Final Analysis | From date of randomization until death due to any cause or censored (final analysis till study completion, approximately up to 10.51 years) | OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Participants without survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up were censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Data for this outcome measure was reported at final analysis. |
| Survival Probability at 1 Year, 2 Year and 3 Year | 1, 2 and 3 years after randomization | One, two or three-year survival probability was defined as the probability of survival 1 year, 2 or 3 years after the date of randomization. The survival probability was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the product limit method. |
| Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | From randomization up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (assessed up to analysis date of 15-Nov-2021, approximately 8.7 years) | Laboratory abnormalities included anemia, hemoglobin increased, neutrophils (absolute), platelets, white blood cells, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin (total), creatinine, hypercalcemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia and hyponatremia. Laboratory abnormalities were graded by CTCAE version (v) 4.0 as Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe and Grade 4 = life-threatening. Categories with at least 1 non-zero data values are reported. |
| Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Index | From Baseline up to 2.5 years | The EuroQol EQ-5D is a 6-item instrument designed to assess health status in terms of a single index value or utility score. It contains 5 descriptors of current health state (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) with each dimension having 3 levels of function (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem). The scores on the 5 descriptors are summarized to create a single summary score. An overall utility score is calculated based on these domains, with a range score from 0 (worse health scenario) to a maximum of 1.0 (best health scenario). |
Countries
Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Poland, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 666 participants were randomized at 239 centers in 19 countries.
Pre-assignment details
The study consisted of a screening visit within 28 days before randomization, an active treatment phase, divided in cycles of 28 days each, and a post-treatment follow-up period during which survival and new anti-cancer therapy information was collected every 6 months (±7 days) from the last dose of study treatment.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole Participants received letrozole 2.5 milligram (mg) orally QD (once daily) combined with palbociclib 125 mg QD for 21 days of every-28-day cycle, followed by 7 days off treatment. | 444 |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole Participants received letrozole 2.5 mg orally QD combined with placebo QD for 21 days of every-28-day cycle, followed by 7 days off treatment. | 222 |
| Total | 666 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 32 | 9 |
| Overall Study | Death | 10 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Global Deterioration of Health Status | 28 | 12 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 3 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Objective Progression or Relapse | 286 | 172 |
| Overall Study | Participant Refused Continued Treatment | 27 | 15 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 5 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Site Terminated by Sponsor | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Unspecified reasons | 52 | 8 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Placebo Plus Letrozole | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 61.7 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 | 60.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 | 61.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 444 Participants | 222 Participants | 666 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 16 / 444 | 6 / 222 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 435 / 444 | 209 / 222 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 125 / 444 | 38 / 222 |
Outcome results
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) or death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data include more than 1 date, the first date will be used. PFS (in months) will be calculated as (first event date - randomization date +1)/30.4. Progression is defined using RECIST v1.1, as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions.
Time frame: From randomization date to date of first documentation of progression or death (up to approximately 2.5 years)
Population: ITT population or full analysis set included all participants who were randomized, with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study medication or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator | 24.8 Months |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator | 14.5 Months |
Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Index
The EuroQol EQ-5D is a 6-item instrument designed to assess health status in terms of a single index value or utility score. It contains 5 descriptors of current health state (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) with each dimension having 3 levels of function (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem). The scores on the 5 descriptors are summarized to create a single summary score. An overall utility score is calculated based on these domains, with a range score from 0 (worse health scenario) to a maximum of 1.0 (best health scenario).
Time frame: From Baseline up to 2.5 years
Population: Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Analysis Set is a subset of ITT participants, who had both baseline and at least one follow-up PRO assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Index | 0.014 Units on a scale |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Index | -0.010 Units on a scale |
Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B)
FACT is a modular approach to assess participant health-related quality of life using a 'core' set of questions (FACT-G) as well as a cancer site-specific module. The FACT-G is a 27-item compilation of general questions divided into 4 domains: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, and Functional Well-Being. The FACT-B consisted of the FACT-G (27-item) and a breast-specific module: a 10-item instrument designed to assess participant concerns relating to breast cancer. For all questions, participants were asked to respond to a five-level scale where 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. FACT-B total score = Physical Well-Being + Social/Family Well-Being + Emotional Well-Being + Functional Well-Being + Breast Cancer Subscale. As each of the items ranges from 0-4, the range of possible scores is 0-144, with 0 being the worst possible score and 144 the best.
Time frame: From Baseline up to 2.5 years
Population: Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Analysis Set is a subset of ITT participants, who had both baseline and at least one follow-up PRO assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) | -0.106 Units on a scale |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) | 0.219 Units on a scale |
Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and sent to a central laboratory for blinded manual adjudication. The average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR), by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR) and corrected QT interval according to study-specific criteria (QTcS). Time-matched change from baseline values were reported for QTc analysis population.
Time frame: Time-matched triplicate ECGs were collected at 0 (predose), 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours on Day 0 and on Cycle1 Day14
Population: QTc analysis set is a subset of as treated (AT) population who were in Group 1; their QTc was used to study the effect of palbociclib on QT interval via serial triplicate ECGs with PK draws; and who had \>= 1 pair of time-matched Day 0 and palbociclib postdose (Cycle1 Day14) measurements.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcF at 0 hour | 1.10 msec |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcS at 2 hour | 3.32 msec |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcS at 4 hour | 2.76 msec |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcF at 2 hour | 3.68 msec |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcF at 4 hour | 2.86 msec |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcF at 6 hour | 4.57 msec |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcF at 8 hour | 1.21 msec |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcB at 0 hour | -0.11 msec |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcB at 2 hour | 1.46 msec |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcB at 4 hour | 2.58 msec |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcB at 6 hour | 4.03 msec |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcB at 8 hour | -0.17 msec |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcS at 6 hour | 4.49 msec |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcS at 8 hour | 0.94 msec |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcS at 0 hour | 0.80 msec |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcB at 6 hour | 0.53 msec |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcS at 0 hour | 2.95 msec |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcB at 0 hour | 2.78 msec |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcS at 2 hour | 1.65 msec |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcS at 6 hour | 0.72 msec |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcS at 4 hour | 1.74 msec |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcF at 0 hour | 3.06 msec |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcB at 2 hour | 0.83 msec |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcF at 2 hour | 1.73 msec |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcB at 8 hour | 4.14 msec |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcF at 4 hour | 1.54 msec |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcB at 4 hour | 2.47 msec |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcF at 6 hour | 0.71 msec |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcS at 8 hour | 3.14 msec |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14 | QTcF at 8 hour | 2.84 msec |
Disease Control (DC)/Clinical Benefit Response (CBR)
DC is defined as overall CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) \>=24 weeks according to RECIST version 1.1. Disease Control Rate (DCR) is defined as participants with CR, PR, or SD \>=24 weeks relative to all randomized participants. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor reevaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, a best response of SD\>=24 weeks, or who died, progressed, or dropped out for any reason prior to achieving reaching a CR or PR and a best response of SD\>=24 weeks was counted as non-responders in DCR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10mm). PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression.
Time frame: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)
Population: ITT population or full analysis set included all participants who were randomized, with study medication, regardless of whether participants received study medication or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Disease Control (DC)/Clinical Benefit Response (CBR) | 85.8 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Disease Control (DC)/Clinical Benefit Response (CBR) | 71.2 Percentage of participants |
Duration of Response (DR)
DR is defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date will be used. DR was calculated as \[the date response ended (i.e. date of PD or death) - first CR or PR date + 1)\]/30.4. DR would only be calculated for the subgroup of participants with an objective tumor response. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10mm). PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression.
Time frame: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)
Population: Participants who had tumor response with CR or PR during study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Duration of Response (DR) | 20.1 Months |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Duration of Response (DR) | 16.7 Months |
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade
Laboratory abnormalities included anemia, hemoglobin increased, neutrophils (absolute), platelets, white blood cells, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin (total), creatinine, hypercalcemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia and hyponatremia. Laboratory abnormalities were graded by CTCAE version (v) 4.0 as Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe and Grade 4 = life-threatening. Categories with at least 1 non-zero data values are reported.
Time frame: From randomization up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (assessed up to analysis date of 15-Nov-2021, approximately 8.7 years)
Population: AT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hyperkalemia: Grade 1-2 | 118 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1-2 | 174 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hyperkalemia: Grade 3 | 6 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Platelets: Grade 1-2 | 289 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypermagnesemia: Grade 1-2 | 71 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Neutrophils (Absolute): Grade 1-2 | 109 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypermagnesemia: Grade 3 | 9 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | AST: Grade 1-2 | 260 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypermagnesemia: Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Anemia: Grade 1-2 | 328 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypernatremia: Grade 1-2 | 94 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Platelets: Grade 3 | 6 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypernatremia: Grade 3 | 8 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | AST: Grade 3 | 23 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1-2 | 118 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Platelets: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Bilirubin (Total): Grade 1-2 | 33 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypocalcemia: Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Anemia: Grade 3 | 30 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Bilirubin (Total): Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | White Blood Cells: Grade 1-2 | 248 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | White Blood Cells: Grade 3 | 177 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | White Blood Cells: Grade 4 | 6 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Neutrophils (Absolute): Grade 3 | 254 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | ALT: Grade 1-2 | 222 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Creatinine: Grade 1-2 | 418 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypocalcemia: Grade 4 | 3 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hemoglobin Increased: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypocalcemia: Grade 1-2 | 158 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Creatinine: Grade 3 | 8 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypokalemia: Grade 1-2 | 105 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | ALT: Grade 3 | 16 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypokalemia: Grade 3 | 11 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Creatinine: Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypomagnesemia: Grade 1-2 | 127 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Neutrophils (Absolute): Grade 4 | 60 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypomagnesemia: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypercalcemia: Grade 1-2 | 111 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypomagnesemia: Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | ALT: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hyponatremia: Grade 1-2 | 107 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypercalcemia: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hyponatremia: Grade 3 | 11 Participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hemoglobin Increased: Grade 1-2 | 14 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypermagnesemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Anemia: Grade 1-2 | 90 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Anemia: Grade 3 | 6 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hemoglobin Increased: Grade 1-2 | 25 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hemoglobin Increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Neutrophils (Absolute): Grade 1-2 | 42 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Neutrophils (Absolute): Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Neutrophils (Absolute): Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Platelets: Grade 1-2 | 32 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | White Blood Cells: Grade 1-2 | 57 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | White Blood Cells: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | ALT: Grade 1-2 | 76 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | ALT: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | ALT: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1-2 | 95 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | AST: Grade 1-2 | 82 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | AST: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Bilirubin (Total): Grade 1-2 | 11 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Bilirubin (Total): Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Creatinine: Grade 1-2 | 201 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Creatinine: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Creatinine: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypercalcemia: Grade 1-2 | 54 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypercalcemia: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hyperkalemia: Grade 1-2 | 51 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hyperkalemia: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypermagnesemia: Grade 1-2 | 26 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypermagnesemia: Grade 3 | 6 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypernatremia: Grade 1-2 | 35 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypernatremia: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1-2 | 42 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypocalcemia: Grade 1-2 | 48 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Platelets: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Platelets: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | White Blood Cells: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypocalcemia: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypocalcemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypokalemia: Grade 1-2 | 32 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypokalemia: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypomagnesemia: Grade 1-2 | 41 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypomagnesemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hypomagnesemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hyponatremia: Grade 1-2 | 44 Participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade | Hyponatremia: Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
Objective Response as Assessed by the Investigator
Objective Response (OR) defined as overall complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST v1.1. Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as proportion of participants with CR or PR relative to all randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, or who died, progressed/ dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in assessment of ORR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10mm). PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression.
Time frame: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)
Population: ITT population or full analysis set included all participants who were randomized, with study medication, regardless of whether participants received study medication or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Objective Response as Assessed by the Investigator | 46.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Objective Response as Assessed by the Investigator | 38.3 Percentage of participants |
Objective Response: Participants With Measurable Disease at Baseline as Assessed by the Investigator
The OR is defined as the overall CR or PR according to the RECIST v1.1. ORR is defined as proportion of participants with CR or PR relative to all randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, or who died, progressed/ dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the assessment of ORR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10mm). PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression.
Time frame: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)
Population: Participants who had measurable disease at baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Objective Response: Participants With Measurable Disease at Baseline as Assessed by the Investigator | 60.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Objective Response: Participants With Measurable Disease at Baseline as Assessed by the Investigator | 49.1 Percentage of participants |
Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) at Steady-State
Summary of plasma palbociclib within-participant mean steady-state trough concentrations.
Time frame: 0 hour (predose) on Day 14 of cycles 1 and 2
Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set was a subset of AT participants, who were treated with Palbociclib and had at least one measured plasma concentration. Here Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) at Steady-State | Cycle 1 Day 14 | 70.1 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 59 |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) at Steady-State | Cycle 2 Day 14 | 64.2 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 82 |
Overall Survival (OS): Final Analysis
OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Participants without survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up were censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Data for this outcome measure was reported at final analysis.
Time frame: From date of randomization until death due to any cause or censored (final analysis till study completion, approximately up to 10.51 years)
Population: ITT population or full analysis set included all participants who were randomized, with study medication, regardless of whether participants received study medication or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Overall Survival (OS): Final Analysis | 53.8 Months |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Overall Survival (OS): Final Analysis | 49.8 Months |
Overall Survival (OS): Primary Analysis
OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Participants without survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up were censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Data for this outcome measure was reported at primary analysis.
Time frame: From date of randomization until death due to any cause or censored, (assessed up to data cut-off date of 15-Nov-2021, approximately 8.7 years)
Population: ITT population or full analysis set included all participants who were randomized, with study medication, regardless of whether participants received study medication or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Overall Survival (OS): Primary Analysis | 53.9 Months |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Overall Survival (OS): Primary Analysis | 51.2 Months |
Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and sent to a central laboratory for blinded manual adjudication. The average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR), by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR) and corrected QT interval according to study-specific criteria (QTcS). Percentage of participants with post-baseline maximum absolute values and maximum increase from baseline were summarized for the safety analysis population.
Time frame: For safety monitoring triplicate ECGs were obtained at 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 1 of Cycle 1, Day 14 of Cycles 1 and Cycle 2, then on Day 1 of Cycles 4, 7, and 10 (ECGs beyond Cycle 10 were performed as clinically indicated)
Population: The AT population or safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcF 480-<500 msec | 1.6 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcS 30<=Change <60 msec | 6.6 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcF <450 msec | 85.9 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcS Change>=60 msec | 0.7 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcF >=500 msec | 0.2 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcF Change <30 msec | 91.6 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcS >=500 msec | 0.5 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcF 30<=Change <60 msec | 7.9 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcB 30<=Change <60 msec | 10.2 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcB <450 msec | 64.9 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcB Change>=60 msec | 0.9 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcF 450-<480 msec | 12.2 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcS 450-<480 msec | 17.9 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcB 450-<480 msec | 32.2 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcB 480-<500 msec | 2.3 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcB >=500 msec | 0.7 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcS 480-<500 msec | 1.1 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcF Change>=60 msec | 0.5 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcS Change <30 msec | 92.7 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcB Change <30 msec | 88.9 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcS <450 msec | 80.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcB Change <30 msec | 91.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcS <450 msec | 85.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcS 450-<480 msec | 11.8 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcS 480-<500 msec | 2.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcS >=500 msec | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcF <450 msec | 89.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcF 450-<480 msec | 9.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcF 480-<500 msec | 0.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcF >=500 msec | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcB <450 msec | 69.1 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcB >=500 msec | 0.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcS Change <30 msec | 94.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcS 30<=Change <60 msec | 5.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcS Change>=60 msec | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcF Change <30 msec | 93.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcB 30<=Change <60 msec | 8.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcB Change>=60 msec | 0.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcB 450-<480 msec | 27.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcB 480-<500 msec | 3.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcF 30<=Change <60 msec | 6.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc) | Maximum QTcF Change>=60 msec | 0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life-threatening; required hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE were events that occurred between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Severity was graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 4.0 as Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening and Grade 5 = death related to AE. Discontinuation included permanent, temporary discontinuation and dose reduction due to AEs.
Time frame: From date of randomization up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (final analysis till study completion, approximately up to 10.51 years)
Population: AT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Participants with AEs | 99.1 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Participants with SAEs | 28.2 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Participants with Grade 3 or 4 AEs | 83.1 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Participants with Grade 5 AEs | 3.6 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Permanently discontinued study due to AEs | 4.1 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Permanently disc. palbociclib/placebo due to AEs | 14.4 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Permanently discontinued letrozole due to AEs | 9.2 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Temporarily disc. palbociclib/placebo due to AEs | 79.7 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Temporarily discontinued letrozole due to AEs | 23.0 Percentage of participants |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | With palbociclib/placebo dose reduction due to AEs | 41.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | With palbociclib/placebo dose reduction due to AEs | 2.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Participants with AEs | 96.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Permanently disc. palbociclib/placebo due to AEs | 6.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Participants with SAEs | 17.1 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Temporarily discontinued letrozole due to AEs | 11.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Participants with Grade 3 or 4 AEs | 30.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Permanently discontinued letrozole due to AEs | 5.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Participants with Grade 5 AEs | 2.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Temporarily disc. palbociclib/placebo due to AEs | 17.1 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities | Permanently discontinued study due to AEs | 2.3 Percentage of participants |
PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)
PFS by biomarker status by Investigator assessment. Progression is defined using RECIST v1.1, as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Positive is defined as H-Score \>=1 and negative as H-Score \<1. H-Score is calculated as the sum of the % of cells at each level of staining intensity (0, 1+, 2+, and 3+) multiplied by the staining intensity value: H-Score = (% at 0)\*0 + (% at 1+)\*1 + (% at 2+)\*2 + (% at 3+)\*3. H-Score values range from 0 to 300. ER stands for estrogen receptor and Rb stands for retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product.
Time frame: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 24 Months)
Population: ITT population or full analysis set included all participants who were randomized, with study medication, regardless of whether participants received study medication or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized. Here Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | ER Negative | 15.6 Months |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | Rb Positive | 24.2 Months |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | Cyclin D1 Positive | 24.8 Months |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | Cyclin D1 Negative | 11.1 Months |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | p16 Positive | 24.8 Months |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | p16 Negative | 16.8 Months |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | p16 H-Score<175 | 23.7 Months |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | p16 H-Score>=175 | 24.2 Months |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | Ki67 >20% | 17.5 Months |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | ER Positive | 24.9 Months |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | Rb Negative | NA Months |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | Ki67 <=20% | 27.6 Months |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | Cyclin D1 Positive | 13.8 Months |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | ER Negative | 5.4 Months |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | p16 H-Score<175 | 13.8 Months |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | Rb Positive | 13.7 Months |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | Rb Negative | 18.5 Months |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | ER Positive | 16.3 Months |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | p16 H-Score>=175 | 5.6 Months |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | Cyclin D1 Negative | 8.1 Months |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | Ki67 <=20% | 16.8 Months |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | p16 Positive | 13.8 Months |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | Ki67 >20% | 8.4 Months |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6) | p16 Negative | 13.8 Months |
Survival Probability at 1 Year, 2 Year and 3 Year
One, two or three-year survival probability was defined as the probability of survival 1 year, 2 or 3 years after the date of randomization. The survival probability was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the product limit method.
Time frame: 1, 2 and 3 years after randomization
Population: ITT population or full analysis set included all participants who were randomized, with study medication, regardless of whether participants received study medication or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Survival Probability at 1 Year, 2 Year and 3 Year | 1 year survival probability | 92.7 Percent probability |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Survival Probability at 1 Year, 2 Year and 3 Year | 2 year survival probability | 78.4 Percent probability |
| Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | Survival Probability at 1 Year, 2 Year and 3 Year | 3 year survival probability | 69.8 Percent probability |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Survival Probability at 1 Year, 2 Year and 3 Year | 1 year survival probability | 94.9 Percent probability |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Survival Probability at 1 Year, 2 Year and 3 Year | 2 year survival probability | 82.5 Percent probability |
| Placebo Plus Letrozole | Survival Probability at 1 Year, 2 Year and 3 Year | 3 year survival probability | 65.0 Percent probability |