Skip to content

A Study of Palbociclib (PD-0332991) + Letrozole vs. Letrozole For 1st Line Treatment Of Postmenopausal Women With ER+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer (PALOMA-2)

A RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER, DOUBLE-BLIND PHASE 3 STUDY OF PD-0332991 (ORAL CDK 4/6 INHIBITOR) PLUS LETROZOLE VERSUS PLACEBO PLUS LETROZOLE FOR THE TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH ER (+), HER2 (-) BREAST CANCER WHO HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY PRIOR SYSTEMIC ANTI CANCER TREATMENT FOR ADVANCED DISEASE

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01740427
Enrollment
666
Registered
2012-12-04
Start date
2013-02-22
Completion date
2023-11-09
Last updated
2024-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

breast cancer, postmenopausal women, estrogen-receptor positive, HER2 negative, locoregionally recurrent, metastatic, Palbociclib (PD-0332991), PALOMA-2

Brief summary

The study is designed to compare the clinical benefit following treatment with letrozole in combination with PD-0332991 versus letrozole in combination with placebo in postmenopausal women with ER(+)/HER2(-) advanced breast cancer who have not received prior systemic anti cancer therapies for their advanced/metastatic disease.

Interventions

PD-0332991, 125mg, orally once daily on Day 1 to Day 21 of every 28-day cycle followed by 7 days off treatment

DRUGLetrozole

Letrozole, 2.5mg, orally once daily (continuously)

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo, 125mg, orally once daily on Day 1 to Day 21 of every 28-day cycle followed by 7 days off treatment

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult women with locoregionally recurrent or metastatic disease not amenable to curative therapy. * Confirmed diagnosis of ER positive breast cancer * No prior systemic anti-cancer therapy for advanced ER+ disease. * Postmenopausal women * Measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criterion in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] or bone-only disease * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group \[ECOG\] 0-2 * Adequate organ and marrow function * Patient must agree to provide tumor tissue

Exclusion criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of HER2 positive disease * Patients with advanced, symptomatic, visceral spread that are at risk of life threatening complication in the short term * Known uncontrolled or symptomatic CNS metastases * Prior (neo)adjuvant treatment with letrozole or anastrozole with DFI ≤ 12-months from completion of treatment. * Prior treatment with any CDK 4/6 inhibitor.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom randomization date to date of first documentation of progression or death (up to approximately 2.5 years)PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) or death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data include more than 1 date, the first date will be used. PFS (in months) will be calculated as (first event date - randomization date +1)/30.4. Progression is defined using RECIST v1.1, as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response: Participants With Measurable Disease at Baseline as Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)The OR is defined as the overall CR or PR according to the RECIST v1.1. ORR is defined as proportion of participants with CR or PR relative to all randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, or who died, progressed/ dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the assessment of ORR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10mm). PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression.
Duration of Response (DR)From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)DR is defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date will be used. DR was calculated as \[the date response ended (i.e. date of PD or death) - first CR or PR date + 1)\]/30.4. DR would only be calculated for the subgroup of participants with an objective tumor response. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10mm). PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression.
Disease Control (DC)/Clinical Benefit Response (CBR)From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)DC is defined as overall CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) \>=24 weeks according to RECIST version 1.1. Disease Control Rate (DCR) is defined as participants with CR, PR, or SD \>=24 weeks relative to all randomized participants. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor reevaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, a best response of SD\>=24 weeks, or who died, progressed, or dropped out for any reason prior to achieving reaching a CR or PR and a best response of SD\>=24 weeks was counted as non-responders in DCR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10mm). PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression.
PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 24 Months)PFS by biomarker status by Investigator assessment. Progression is defined using RECIST v1.1, as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Positive is defined as H-Score \>=1 and negative as H-Score \<1. H-Score is calculated as the sum of the % of cells at each level of staining intensity (0, 1+, 2+, and 3+) multiplied by the staining intensity value: H-Score = (% at 0)\*0 + (% at 1+)\*1 + (% at 2+)\*2 + (% at 3+)\*3. H-Score values range from 0 to 300. ER stands for estrogen receptor and Rb stands for retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product.
Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14Time-matched triplicate ECGs were collected at 0 (predose), 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours on Day 0 and on Cycle1 Day14Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and sent to a central laboratory for blinded manual adjudication. The average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR), by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR) and corrected QT interval according to study-specific criteria (QTcS). Time-matched change from baseline values were reported for QTc analysis population.
Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)For safety monitoring triplicate ECGs were obtained at 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 1 of Cycle 1, Day 14 of Cycles 1 and Cycle 2, then on Day 1 of Cycles 4, 7, and 10 (ECGs beyond Cycle 10 were performed as clinically indicated)Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and sent to a central laboratory for blinded manual adjudication. The average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR), by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR) and corrected QT interval according to study-specific criteria (QTcS). Percentage of participants with post-baseline maximum absolute values and maximum increase from baseline were summarized for the safety analysis population.
Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) at Steady-State0 hour (predose) on Day 14 of cycles 1 and 2Summary of plasma palbociclib within-participant mean steady-state trough concentrations.
Objective Response as Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)Objective Response (OR) defined as overall complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST v1.1. Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as proportion of participants with CR or PR relative to all randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, or who died, progressed/ dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in assessment of ORR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10mm). PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression.
Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B)From Baseline up to 2.5 yearsFACT is a modular approach to assess participant health-related quality of life using a 'core' set of questions (FACT-G) as well as a cancer site-specific module. The FACT-G is a 27-item compilation of general questions divided into 4 domains: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, and Functional Well-Being. The FACT-B consisted of the FACT-G (27-item) and a breast-specific module: a 10-item instrument designed to assess participant concerns relating to breast cancer. For all questions, participants were asked to respond to a five-level scale where 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. FACT-B total score = Physical Well-Being + Social/Family Well-Being + Emotional Well-Being + Functional Well-Being + Breast Cancer Subscale. As each of the items ranges from 0-4, the range of possible scores is 0-144, with 0 being the worst possible score and 144 the best.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesFrom date of randomization up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (final analysis till study completion, approximately up to 10.51 years)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life-threatening; required hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE were events that occurred between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Severity was graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 4.0 as Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening and Grade 5 = death related to AE. Discontinuation included permanent, temporary discontinuation and dose reduction due to AEs.
Overall Survival (OS): Primary AnalysisFrom date of randomization until death due to any cause or censored, (assessed up to data cut-off date of 15-Nov-2021, approximately 8.7 years)OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Participants without survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up were censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Data for this outcome measure was reported at primary analysis.
Overall Survival (OS): Final AnalysisFrom date of randomization until death due to any cause or censored (final analysis till study completion, approximately up to 10.51 years)OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Participants without survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up were censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Data for this outcome measure was reported at final analysis.
Survival Probability at 1 Year, 2 Year and 3 Year1, 2 and 3 years after randomizationOne, two or three-year survival probability was defined as the probability of survival 1 year, 2 or 3 years after the date of randomization. The survival probability was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the product limit method.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeFrom randomization up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (assessed up to analysis date of 15-Nov-2021, approximately 8.7 years)Laboratory abnormalities included anemia, hemoglobin increased, neutrophils (absolute), platelets, white blood cells, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin (total), creatinine, hypercalcemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia and hyponatremia. Laboratory abnormalities were graded by CTCAE version (v) 4.0 as Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe and Grade 4 = life-threatening. Categories with at least 1 non-zero data values are reported.
Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) IndexFrom Baseline up to 2.5 yearsThe EuroQol EQ-5D is a 6-item instrument designed to assess health status in terms of a single index value or utility score. It contains 5 descriptors of current health state (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) with each dimension having 3 levels of function (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem). The scores on the 5 descriptors are summarized to create a single summary score. An overall utility score is calculated based on these domains, with a range score from 0 (worse health scenario) to a maximum of 1.0 (best health scenario).

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Poland, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 666 participants were randomized at 239 centers in 19 countries.

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of a screening visit within 28 days before randomization, an active treatment phase, divided in cycles of 28 days each, and a post-treatment follow-up period during which survival and new anti-cancer therapy information was collected every 6 months (±7 days) from the last dose of study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole
Participants received letrozole 2.5 milligram (mg) orally QD (once daily) combined with palbociclib 125 mg QD for 21 days of every-28-day cycle, followed by 7 days off treatment.
444
Placebo Plus Letrozole
Participants received letrozole 2.5 mg orally QD combined with placebo QD for 21 days of every-28-day cycle, followed by 7 days off treatment.
222
Total666

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event329
Overall StudyDeath103
Overall StudyGlobal Deterioration of Health Status2812
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up30
Overall StudyObjective Progression or Relapse286172
Overall StudyParticipant Refused Continued Treatment2715
Overall StudyProtocol Violation53
Overall StudySite Terminated by Sponsor10
Overall StudyUnspecified reasons528

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPalbociclib Plus LetrozolePlacebo Plus LetrozoleTotal
Age, Continuous61.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
60.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
61.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
444 Participants222 Participants666 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
16 / 4446 / 222
other
Total, other adverse events
435 / 444209 / 222
serious
Total, serious adverse events
125 / 44438 / 222

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator

PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) or death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data include more than 1 date, the first date will be used. PFS (in months) will be calculated as (first event date - randomization date +1)/30.4. Progression is defined using RECIST v1.1, as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions.

Time frame: From randomization date to date of first documentation of progression or death (up to approximately 2.5 years)

Population: ITT population or full analysis set included all participants who were randomized, with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants received study medication or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleProgression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator24.8 Months
Placebo Plus LetrozoleProgression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator14.5 Months
p-value: <0.00000195% CI: [0.463, 0.718]Stratified Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Index

The EuroQol EQ-5D is a 6-item instrument designed to assess health status in terms of a single index value or utility score. It contains 5 descriptors of current health state (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) with each dimension having 3 levels of function (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem). The scores on the 5 descriptors are summarized to create a single summary score. An overall utility score is calculated based on these domains, with a range score from 0 (worse health scenario) to a maximum of 1.0 (best health scenario).

Time frame: From Baseline up to 2.5 years

Population: Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Analysis Set is a subset of ITT participants, who had both baseline and at least one follow-up PRO assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleChange From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Index0.014 Units on a scale
Placebo Plus LetrozoleChange From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Index-0.010 Units on a scale
p-value: 0.092595% CI: [-0.004, 0.051]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B)

FACT is a modular approach to assess participant health-related quality of life using a 'core' set of questions (FACT-G) as well as a cancer site-specific module. The FACT-G is a 27-item compilation of general questions divided into 4 domains: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, and Functional Well-Being. The FACT-B consisted of the FACT-G (27-item) and a breast-specific module: a 10-item instrument designed to assess participant concerns relating to breast cancer. For all questions, participants were asked to respond to a five-level scale where 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. FACT-B total score = Physical Well-Being + Social/Family Well-Being + Emotional Well-Being + Functional Well-Being + Breast Cancer Subscale. As each of the items ranges from 0-4, the range of possible scores is 0-144, with 0 being the worst possible score and 144 the best.

Time frame: From Baseline up to 2.5 years

Population: Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Analysis Set is a subset of ITT participants, who had both baseline and at least one follow-up PRO assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleChange From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B)-0.106 Units on a scale
Placebo Plus LetrozoleChange From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B)0.219 Units on a scale
p-value: 0.782295% CI: [-2.63, 1.98]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Corrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and sent to a central laboratory for blinded manual adjudication. The average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR), by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR) and corrected QT interval according to study-specific criteria (QTcS). Time-matched change from baseline values were reported for QTc analysis population.

Time frame: Time-matched triplicate ECGs were collected at 0 (predose), 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours on Day 0 and on Cycle1 Day14

Population: QTc analysis set is a subset of as treated (AT) population who were in Group 1; their QTc was used to study the effect of palbociclib on QT interval via serial triplicate ECGs with PK draws; and who had \>= 1 pair of time-matched Day 0 and palbociclib postdose (Cycle1 Day14) measurements.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcF at 0 hour1.10 msec
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcS at 2 hour3.32 msec
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcS at 4 hour2.76 msec
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcF at 2 hour3.68 msec
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcF at 4 hour2.86 msec
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcF at 6 hour4.57 msec
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcF at 8 hour1.21 msec
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcB at 0 hour-0.11 msec
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcB at 2 hour1.46 msec
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcB at 4 hour2.58 msec
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcB at 6 hour4.03 msec
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcB at 8 hour-0.17 msec
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcS at 6 hour4.49 msec
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcS at 8 hour0.94 msec
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcS at 0 hour0.80 msec
Placebo Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcB at 6 hour0.53 msec
Placebo Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcS at 0 hour2.95 msec
Placebo Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcB at 0 hour2.78 msec
Placebo Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcS at 2 hour1.65 msec
Placebo Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcS at 6 hour0.72 msec
Placebo Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcS at 4 hour1.74 msec
Placebo Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcF at 0 hour3.06 msec
Placebo Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcB at 2 hour0.83 msec
Placebo Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcF at 2 hour1.73 msec
Placebo Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcB at 8 hour4.14 msec
Placebo Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcF at 4 hour1.54 msec
Placebo Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcB at 4 hour2.47 msec
Placebo Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcF at 6 hour0.71 msec
Placebo Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcS at 8 hour3.14 msec
Placebo Plus LetrozoleCorrected QT Interval (QTc) Time-Matched Change From Baseline on Cycle 1 Day 14QTcF at 8 hour2.84 msec
Secondary

Disease Control (DC)/Clinical Benefit Response (CBR)

DC is defined as overall CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) \>=24 weeks according to RECIST version 1.1. Disease Control Rate (DCR) is defined as participants with CR, PR, or SD \>=24 weeks relative to all randomized participants. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor reevaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, a best response of SD\>=24 weeks, or who died, progressed, or dropped out for any reason prior to achieving reaching a CR or PR and a best response of SD\>=24 weeks was counted as non-responders in DCR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10mm). PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression.

Time frame: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)

Population: ITT population or full analysis set included all participants who were randomized, with study medication, regardless of whether participants received study medication or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleDisease Control (DC)/Clinical Benefit Response (CBR)85.8 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleDisease Control (DC)/Clinical Benefit Response (CBR)71.2 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Stratified analysis: Stratified by disease site (visceral, non-visceral) per randomization.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.619, 3.722]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Duration of Response (DR)

DR is defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date will be used. DR was calculated as \[the date response ended (i.e. date of PD or death) - first CR or PR date + 1)\]/30.4. DR would only be calculated for the subgroup of participants with an objective tumor response. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10mm). PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression.

Time frame: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)

Population: Participants who had tumor response with CR or PR during study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleDuration of Response (DR)20.1 Months
Placebo Plus LetrozoleDuration of Response (DR)16.7 Months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade

Laboratory abnormalities included anemia, hemoglobin increased, neutrophils (absolute), platelets, white blood cells, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin (total), creatinine, hypercalcemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia and hyponatremia. Laboratory abnormalities were graded by CTCAE version (v) 4.0 as Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe and Grade 4 = life-threatening. Categories with at least 1 non-zero data values are reported.

Time frame: From randomization up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (assessed up to analysis date of 15-Nov-2021, approximately 8.7 years)

Population: AT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHyperkalemia: Grade 1-2118 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeAlkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1-2174 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHyperkalemia: Grade 36 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradePlatelets: Grade 1-2289 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHyperkalemia: Grade 42 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeAlkaline Phosphatase: Grade 37 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypermagnesemia: Grade 1-271 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeNeutrophils (Absolute): Grade 1-2109 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypermagnesemia: Grade 39 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeAST: Grade 1-2260 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypermagnesemia: Grade 42 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeAnemia: Grade 1-2328 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypernatremia: Grade 1-294 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradePlatelets: Grade 36 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypernatremia: Grade 38 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeAST: Grade 323 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypoalbuminemia: Grade 1-2118 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradePlatelets: Grade 41 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeBilirubin (Total): Grade 1-233 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypocalcemia: Grade 34 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeAnemia: Grade 330 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeBilirubin (Total): Grade 33 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeWhite Blood Cells: Grade 1-2248 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeWhite Blood Cells: Grade 3177 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeWhite Blood Cells: Grade 46 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeNeutrophils (Absolute): Grade 3254 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeALT: Grade 1-2222 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeCreatinine: Grade 1-2418 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypocalcemia: Grade 43 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypoalbuminemia: Grade 32 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHemoglobin Increased: Grade 31 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypocalcemia: Grade 1-2158 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeCreatinine: Grade 38 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypokalemia: Grade 1-2105 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeALT: Grade 316 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypokalemia: Grade 311 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeCreatinine: Grade 42 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypomagnesemia: Grade 1-2127 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeNeutrophils (Absolute): Grade 460 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypomagnesemia: Grade 31 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypercalcemia: Grade 1-2111 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypomagnesemia: Grade 42 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeALT: Grade 41 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHyponatremia: Grade 1-2107 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypercalcemia: Grade 31 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHyponatremia: Grade 311 Participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHemoglobin Increased: Grade 1-214 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypermagnesemia: Grade 40 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeAnemia: Grade 1-290 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeAnemia: Grade 36 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHemoglobin Increased: Grade 1-225 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHemoglobin Increased: Grade 30 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeNeutrophils (Absolute): Grade 1-242 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeNeutrophils (Absolute): Grade 32 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeNeutrophils (Absolute): Grade 41 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradePlatelets: Grade 1-232 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeWhite Blood Cells: Grade 1-257 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeWhite Blood Cells: Grade 30 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeALT: Grade 1-276 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeALT: Grade 30 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeALT: Grade 40 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeAlkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1-295 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeAlkaline Phosphatase: Grade 30 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeAST: Grade 1-282 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeAST: Grade 32 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeBilirubin (Total): Grade 1-211 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeBilirubin (Total): Grade 30 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeCreatinine: Grade 1-2201 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeCreatinine: Grade 30 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeCreatinine: Grade 40 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypercalcemia: Grade 1-254 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypercalcemia: Grade 32 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHyperkalemia: Grade 1-251 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHyperkalemia: Grade 31 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHyperkalemia: Grade 40 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypermagnesemia: Grade 1-226 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypermagnesemia: Grade 36 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypernatremia: Grade 1-235 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypernatremia: Grade 31 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypoalbuminemia: Grade 1-242 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypocalcemia: Grade 1-248 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradePlatelets: Grade 30 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradePlatelets: Grade 40 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeWhite Blood Cells: Grade 40 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypocalcemia: Grade 31 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypoalbuminemia: Grade 30 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypocalcemia: Grade 40 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypokalemia: Grade 1-232 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypokalemia: Grade 32 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypomagnesemia: Grade 1-241 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypomagnesemia: Grade 30 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHypomagnesemia: Grade 40 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHyponatremia: Grade 1-244 Participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities by Maximum Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GradeHyponatremia: Grade 34 Participants
Secondary

Objective Response as Assessed by the Investigator

Objective Response (OR) defined as overall complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST v1.1. Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as proportion of participants with CR or PR relative to all randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, or who died, progressed/ dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in assessment of ORR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10mm). PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression.

Time frame: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)

Population: ITT population or full analysis set included all participants who were randomized, with study medication, regardless of whether participants received study medication or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleObjective Response as Assessed by the Investigator46.4 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleObjective Response as Assessed by the Investigator38.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Stratified analysis: Stratified by disease site (visceral vs non-visceral) per randomization.p-value: 0.022495% CI: [1.008, 2.03]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Objective Response: Participants With Measurable Disease at Baseline as Assessed by the Investigator

The OR is defined as the overall CR or PR according to the RECIST v1.1. ORR is defined as proportion of participants with CR or PR relative to all randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, or who died, progressed/ dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the assessment of ORR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \<10mm). PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression.

Time frame: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)

Population: Participants who had measurable disease at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleObjective Response: Participants With Measurable Disease at Baseline as Assessed by the Investigator60.7 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozoleObjective Response: Participants With Measurable Disease at Baseline as Assessed by the Investigator49.1 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Stratified analysis: Stratified by disease site (visceral vs non-visceral) per randomization.p-value: 0.00995% CI: [1.08, 2.347]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) at Steady-State

Summary of plasma palbociclib within-participant mean steady-state trough concentrations.

Time frame: 0 hour (predose) on Day 14 of cycles 1 and 2

Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set was a subset of AT participants, who were treated with Palbociclib and had at least one measured plasma concentration. Here Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleObserved Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) at Steady-StateCycle 1 Day 1470.1 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 59
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleObserved Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) at Steady-StateCycle 2 Day 1464.2 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 82
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS): Final Analysis

OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Participants without survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up were censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Data for this outcome measure was reported at final analysis.

Time frame: From date of randomization until death due to any cause or censored (final analysis till study completion, approximately up to 10.51 years)

Population: ITT population or full analysis set included all participants who were randomized, with study medication, regardless of whether participants received study medication or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleOverall Survival (OS): Final Analysis53.8 Months
Placebo Plus LetrozoleOverall Survival (OS): Final Analysis49.8 Months
p-value: 0.20870695% CI: [0.755, 1.124]Stratified Log Rank
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS): Primary Analysis

OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Participants without survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up were censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Data for this outcome measure was reported at primary analysis.

Time frame: From date of randomization until death due to any cause or censored, (assessed up to data cut-off date of 15-Nov-2021, approximately 8.7 years)

Population: ITT population or full analysis set included all participants who were randomized, with study medication, regardless of whether participants received study medication or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleOverall Survival (OS): Primary Analysis53.9 Months
Placebo Plus LetrozoleOverall Survival (OS): Primary Analysis51.2 Months
p-value: 0.3377595% CI: [0.777, 1.177]Stratified Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and sent to a central laboratory for blinded manual adjudication. The average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR), by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR) and corrected QT interval according to study-specific criteria (QTcS). Percentage of participants with post-baseline maximum absolute values and maximum increase from baseline were summarized for the safety analysis population.

Time frame: For safety monitoring triplicate ECGs were obtained at 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 1 of Cycle 1, Day 14 of Cycles 1 and Cycle 2, then on Day 1 of Cycles 4, 7, and 10 (ECGs beyond Cycle 10 were performed as clinically indicated)

Population: The AT population or safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcF 480-<500 msec1.6 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcS 30<=Change <60 msec6.6 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcF <450 msec85.9 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcS Change>=60 msec0.7 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcF >=500 msec0.2 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcF Change <30 msec91.6 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcS >=500 msec0.5 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcF 30<=Change <60 msec7.9 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcB 30<=Change <60 msec10.2 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcB <450 msec64.9 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcB Change>=60 msec0.9 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcF 450-<480 msec12.2 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcS 450-<480 msec17.9 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcB 450-<480 msec32.2 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcB 480-<500 msec2.3 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcB >=500 msec0.7 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcS 480-<500 msec1.1 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcF Change>=60 msec0.5 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcS Change <30 msec92.7 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcB Change <30 msec88.9 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcS <450 msec80.5 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcB Change <30 msec91.4 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcS <450 msec85.9 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcS 450-<480 msec11.8 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcS 480-<500 msec2.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcS >=500 msec0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcF <450 msec89.5 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcF 450-<480 msec9.5 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcF 480-<500 msec0.9 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcF >=500 msec0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcB <450 msec69.1 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcB >=500 msec0.5 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcS Change <30 msec94.5 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcS 30<=Change <60 msec5.5 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcS Change>=60 msec0 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcF Change <30 msec93.6 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcB 30<=Change <60 msec8.2 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcB Change>=60 msec0.5 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcB 450-<480 msec27.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcB 480-<500 msec3.2 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcF 30<=Change <60 msec6.4 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Corrected QT Interval (QTc)Maximum QTcF Change>=60 msec0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All Causalities

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life-threatening; required hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE were events that occurred between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Severity was graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 4.0 as Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening and Grade 5 = death related to AE. Discontinuation included permanent, temporary discontinuation and dose reduction due to AEs.

Time frame: From date of randomization up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (final analysis till study completion, approximately up to 10.51 years)

Population: AT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication, with treatment assignments designated according to actual study treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesParticipants with AEs99.1 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesParticipants with SAEs28.2 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesParticipants with Grade 3 or 4 AEs83.1 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesParticipants with Grade 5 AEs3.6 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesPermanently discontinued study due to AEs4.1 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesPermanently disc. palbociclib/placebo due to AEs14.4 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesPermanently discontinued letrozole due to AEs9.2 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesTemporarily disc. palbociclib/placebo due to AEs79.7 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesTemporarily discontinued letrozole due to AEs23.0 Percentage of participants
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesWith palbociclib/placebo dose reduction due to AEs41.9 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesWith palbociclib/placebo dose reduction due to AEs2.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesParticipants with AEs96.4 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesPermanently disc. palbociclib/placebo due to AEs6.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesParticipants with SAEs17.1 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesTemporarily discontinued letrozole due to AEs11.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesParticipants with Grade 3 or 4 AEs30.2 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesPermanently discontinued letrozole due to AEs5.9 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesParticipants with Grade 5 AEs2.3 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesTemporarily disc. palbociclib/placebo due to AEs17.1 Percentage of participants
Placebo Plus LetrozolePercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs): All CausalitiesPermanently discontinued study due to AEs2.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

PFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)

PFS by biomarker status by Investigator assessment. Progression is defined using RECIST v1.1, as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Positive is defined as H-Score \>=1 and negative as H-Score \<1. H-Score is calculated as the sum of the % of cells at each level of staining intensity (0, 1+, 2+, and 3+) multiplied by the staining intensity value: H-Score = (% at 0)\*0 + (% at 1+)\*1 + (% at 2+)\*2 + (% at 3+)\*3. H-Score values range from 0 to 300. ER stands for estrogen receptor and Rb stands for retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product.

Time frame: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 24 Months)

Population: ITT population or full analysis set included all participants who were randomized, with study medication, regardless of whether participants received study medication or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized. Here Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)ER Negative15.6 Months
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)Rb Positive24.2 Months
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)Cyclin D1 Positive24.8 Months
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)Cyclin D1 Negative11.1 Months
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)p16 Positive24.8 Months
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)p16 Negative16.8 Months
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)p16 H-Score<17523.7 Months
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)p16 H-Score>=17524.2 Months
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)Ki67 >20%17.5 Months
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)ER Positive24.9 Months
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)Rb NegativeNA Months
Palbociclib Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)Ki67 <=20%27.6 Months
Placebo Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)Cyclin D1 Positive13.8 Months
Placebo Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)ER Negative5.4 Months
Placebo Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)p16 H-Score<17513.8 Months
Placebo Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)Rb Positive13.7 Months
Placebo Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)Rb Negative18.5 Months
Placebo Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)ER Positive16.3 Months
Placebo Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)p16 H-Score>=1755.6 Months
Placebo Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)Cyclin D1 Negative8.1 Months
Placebo Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)Ki67 <=20%16.8 Months
Placebo Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)p16 Positive13.8 Months
Placebo Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)Ki67 >20%8.4 Months
Placebo Plus LetrozolePFS by Tumor Tissue Biomarkers Status, Including Genes (eg, Copy Numbers of CCND1, CDKN2A), Proteins (eg, Ki67, pRb), and RNA Expression (eg, cdk4, cdk6)p16 Negative13.8 Months
Comparison: Statistical analysis for ER positivep-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.443, 0.737]Unstratified log-rank test
Comparison: Statistical analysis for ER Negativep-value: 0.00395% CI: [0.218, 0.751]Unstratified log-rank test
Comparison: Statistical analysis for Rb Positivep-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.416, 0.68]Unstratified log-rank test
Comparison: Statistical analysis for Rb Negativep-value: 0.323795% CI: [0.308, 1.481]Unstratified log-rank test
Comparison: Statistical analysis for Cyclin D1 Positivep-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.437, 0.705]Unstratified log-rank test
Comparison: Statistical analysis for Cyclin D1 Negativep-value: 0.996495% CI: [0.287, 3.461]Unstratified log-rank test
Comparison: Statistical analysis for p16 Positivep-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.4, 0.67]Unstratified log-rank test
Comparison: Statistical analysis for p16 Negativep-value: 0.322195% CI: [0.392, 1.364]Unstratified log-rank test
Comparison: Statistical analysis for p16 HScore\<175p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.455, 0.742]Unstratified log-rank test
Comparison: Statistical analysis for p16 HScore\>=175p-value: 0.002295% CI: [0.1, 0.65]Unstratified log-rank test
Comparison: Statistical analysis for Ki67 \<=20%p-value: 0.000295% CI: [0.379, 0.742]Unstratified log-rank test
Comparison: Statistical analysis for Ki67 \>20%p-value: 0.000795% CI: [0.409, 0.791]Unstratified log-rank test
Secondary

Survival Probability at 1 Year, 2 Year and 3 Year

One, two or three-year survival probability was defined as the probability of survival 1 year, 2 or 3 years after the date of randomization. The survival probability was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the product limit method.

Time frame: 1, 2 and 3 years after randomization

Population: ITT population or full analysis set included all participants who were randomized, with study medication, regardless of whether participants received study medication or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleSurvival Probability at 1 Year, 2 Year and 3 Year1 year survival probability92.7 Percent probability
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleSurvival Probability at 1 Year, 2 Year and 3 Year2 year survival probability78.4 Percent probability
Palbociclib Plus LetrozoleSurvival Probability at 1 Year, 2 Year and 3 Year3 year survival probability69.8 Percent probability
Placebo Plus LetrozoleSurvival Probability at 1 Year, 2 Year and 3 Year1 year survival probability94.9 Percent probability
Placebo Plus LetrozoleSurvival Probability at 1 Year, 2 Year and 3 Year2 year survival probability82.5 Percent probability
Placebo Plus LetrozoleSurvival Probability at 1 Year, 2 Year and 3 Year3 year survival probability65.0 Percent probability

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026