Skip to content

An Efficacy and Safety Trial of Verubecestat (MK-8931) in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease (P07738)

A Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel-Group, Double Blind Efficacy and Safety Trial of MK-8931 With a Long Term Double-Blind Extension in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease (Protocol No. MK-8931-017-10)(Also Known as SCH 900931, P07738)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01739348
Acronym
EPOCH
Enrollment
2211
Registered
2012-12-03
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2017-04-14
Last updated
2018-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer's Disease

Brief summary

This study consists of two parts, Part I and Part II. The purpose of Part I of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of verubecestat (MK-8931) compared with placebo administered for 78 weeks in the treatment of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). The primary study hypotheses for Part I are that at least one verubecestat dose is superior to placebo at 78 weeks of treatment with respect to change from baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) score and that at least one verubecestat dose is superior to placebo at 78 weeks of treatment with respect to change from baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL) score. The first approximately 400 participants entering Part I of the study are identified as the Safety Cohort. Participants who complete Part I of the study may choose to participate in Part II, which is a long term double-blind extension to assess efficacy and safety of verubecestat administered for up to an additional 260 weeks.

Detailed description

Two substudies are included in Part I of the study: 1) a medical imaging substudy to evaluate changes in brain amyloid protein load using positron emission tomography (PET) and an amyloid tracer (\[18F\]flutemetamol); and 2) a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker substudy to evaluate changes in CSF concentrations of amyloid-β related peptides, total tau, and phosphorylated tau (p-tau). The substudies will be conducted only at designated investigational sites. Participants are not required to take part in a substudy in order to take part in the larger trial.

Interventions

DRUGVerubecestat (Part I and Part II)

Single 12 mg verubecestat tablet once daily, taken orally

Single placebo tablet matching verubecestat treatment once daily, taken orally

DRUGVerubecestat (Part II)

Single 40 mg verubecestat tablet once daily, taken orally

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of probable AD based on both a) the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke/Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria and b) the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for AD * AD is of mild to moderate severity * Clear history of cognitive and functional decline over at least one year that is either a) documented in medical records or b) documented by history from an informant who knows the subject well * Able to read at a 6th grade level or equivalent, and must have a history of academic achievement and/or employment sufficient to exclude mental retardation * If a participant is receiving an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, memantine, medical food/supplement (e.g., vitamin E) and/or herbal medications for AD, the dose must have been stable for at least three months before Screening, and the participant must be willing to remain on the same dose for the duration of the trial. Participants may need to be on AD treatments in accordance with local requirements * Participant must have a reliable and competent trial partner/caregiver who must have a close relationship with the subject Inclusion Criteria for Extension Period (Part II): * Tolerated study drug and completed the initial 78-week period of the trial (Part I) * Participant must have a reliable and competent trial partner who must have a close relationship with the subject

Exclusion criteria

* History of stroke * Evidence of a neurological disorder other than the disease being studied (i.e., probable AD) * History of seizures or epilepsy within the last 5 years before Screening * Evidence of a clinically relevant or unstable psychiatric disorder, excluding major depression in remission * Participant is at imminent risk of self-harm or of harm to others * History of alcoholism or drug dependency/abuse within the last 5 years before Screening * Participant does not have a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan obtained within 12 months of Screening and is unwilling or not eligible to undergo an MRI scan at the Screening Visit. With Sponsor approval, a head computed tomography (CT) scan may be substituted for MRI scan to evaluate eligibility * History of hepatitis or liver disease that has been active within the six months prior to Screening Visit * Recent or ongoing, uncontrolled, clinically significant medical condition within 3 months of the Screening Visit (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, thyroid or endocrine disease, congestive heart failure, angina, cardiac or gastrointestinal disease, dialysis, or abnormal renal function) other than the condition being studied such that participation in the trial would pose a significant medical risk to the subject. Controlled co-morbid conditions are not exclusionary if stable within three months of the Screening Visit * History or current evidence of long QT syndrome, corrected QT (QTc) interval ≥470 milliseconds (for male subjects) or ≥480 milliseconds (for female subjects), or torsades de pointes * History of malignancy occurring within the five years before Screening, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or localized prostate carcinoma; or malignancy which has been treated with potentially curative therapy with no evidence of recurrence for ≥3 year post-therapy * Clinically significant vitamin B12 or folate deficiency in the six months before Screening Visit * Use of any investigational drugs within 30 days (or longer depending on drug) before Screening or participation in studies involving repeated cognitive testing within 30 days before Screening. Participation in an observational study, such as those involving annual cognitive assessments and/or neuroimaging, may be allowed if approved by Sponsor * History of a hypersensitivity reaction to more than three drugs * Has tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) * Close family member (including the caregiver, the spouse or any children) who is among the personnel of the investigational or sponsor staff directly involved with this trial Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
[Part II (Extension Study)] Number of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse EventFrom week 78 (end of treatment in Part I) up to week 260 of Part IIThe number of participants discontinuing from study drug due to an AE in Part II was assessed. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.
[Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) ScoreBaseline and week 78Least squares mean change from baseline at week 78 was assessed for the ADAS-Cog score. ADAS-Cog measures cognition by assessing 11 metrics impaired in Alzheimer's Disease (AD): speech; speech comprehension; word finding; word recall; object/finger naming; orientation; obeying commands; ideational praxis; constructional praxis; word recognition; and remembering instruction. For each metric, scores range from 0 (no impairment) to (depending on the metric) either 5 (8 metrics), 8, 10, or 12 (1 metric each); higher scores indicate more severe impairment. Individual scores sum to a total ADAS-Cog score, ranging from 0-70. Higher total scores indicate greater cognitive impairment and AD severity. Further, increases in AD severity over time would be reflected by increases in ADAS-Cog score.
[Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) ScoreBaseline and week 78Least squares mean change from baseline at week 78 was assessed for the ADCS-ADL score. The ADCS-ADL score measures the performance of activities of daily living, calculated from a 24-question survey. For each of the 24 questions, scores range from 0 (no independence) to (depending on the question) either 2 (1 question), 3 (17 questions), 4 (5 questions), or 5 (1 question), with higher scores indicating greater independence in activity performance. Scores from individual questions are summed into a total ADCS-ADL score, with total scores ranging from 0 to 78. Lower scores indicate less independence in activity performance and, as a result, greater AD severity. Further, increases in AD severity over time would be reflected by decreases in ADCS-ADL score.
[Part II (Extension Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) ScoreBaseline and week 104Mean change from baseline at week 104 was assessed for the ADAS-Cog score. ADAS-Cog measures cognition by assessing 11 metrics impaired in Alzheimer's Disease (AD): speech; speech comprehension; word finding; word recall; object/finger naming; orientation; obeying commands; ideational praxis; constructional praxis; word recognition; and remembering instruction. For each metric, scores range from 0 (no impairment) to (depending on the metric) either 5 (8 metrics), 8, 10, or 12 (1 metric each); higher scores indicate more severe impairment. Individual scores sum to a total ADAS-Cog score, ranging from 0-70. Higher total scores indicate greater cognitive impairment and AD severity. Further, increases in AD severity over time would be reflected by increases in ADAS-Cog score. Per study protocol, the baseline measurement to be used was the baseline measurement obtained in Part I.
[Part II (Extension Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) ScoreBaseline and week 104Mean change from baseline at week 104 was assessed for the ADCS-ADL score. The ADCS-ADL score measures the performance of activities of daily living, calculated from a 24-question survey. For each of the 24 questions, scores range from 0 (no independence) to (depending on the question) either 2 (1 question), 3 (17 questions), 4 (5 questions), or 5 (1 question), with higher scores indicating greater independence in activity performance. Scores from individual questions are summed into a total ADCS-ADL score, with total scores ranging from 0 to 78. Lower scores indicate less independence in activity performance and, as a result, greater AD severity. Further, increases in AD severity over time would be reflected by decreases in ADCS-ADL score. Per study protocol, the baseline measurement to be used was the baseline measurement obtained in Part I.
[Part I (Base Study)] Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse EventUp to week 80 (up to 2 weeks following cessation of study treatment in Part I)The number of participants experiencing an adverse event (AE) in Part I was assessed. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.
[Part II (Extension Study)] Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse EventFrom week 78 (end of treatment in Part I) up to week 262 of Part IIThe number of participants experiencing an adverse event (AE) in Part II was assessed. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.
[Part I (Base Study)] Number of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse EventUp to week 78The number of participants discontinuing from study drug due to an AE in Part I was assessed. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
[Part I (Base Study)] Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hippocampal Volume (THV)Baseline and week 78Least squares mean percent change from baseline at week 78 was calculated for Total Hippocampal Volume (THV) as measured by volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (vMRI). Longitudinal analysis of within-participant THV is computed using a change analysis algorithm using tensor-based morphometry. This technique produces one measure of volume change calculated from the registration of serial vMRI scans at the follow-up time point relative to baseline. Negative percent changes from baseline indicate decreases in THV (i.e. increased hippocampal atrophy).
[Part I (Base Study)] Fold Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Total TauBaseline and week 78Least squares mean fold change from baseline at week 78 was calculated for Total Tau concentration in CSF, a measure of brain tau pathology. Per protocol, CSF Total Tau concentration was analyzed as part of a substudy in Part I, with testing occurring only at select trial sites. Least squares mean fold change from baseline \>1 indicates increased Total Tau concentration in the CSF.
[Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Cortical Amyloid Load Assessed by [18F]Flutemetamol PET Standard Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR)Baseline and week 78Least squares mean change from baseline at week 78 was calculated for SUVR, a measure of brain cortical amyloid load. Per protocol, SUVR was analyzed as part of a substudy in Part I, with testing occurring only at select trial sites. Participants receive the PET tracer \[18F\]Flutemetamol (IV). After 90 minutes, participants receive 4 PET scans (5 minutes each in duration). Using these PET scan images, specific brain ROIs (frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes; anterior and posterior cingulate and precuneus) are used to calculate regional SUVRs, defined as the relative ratio of pixel intensities at a specific ROI compared to a reference region (RR; subcortical white matter). These regional SUVRs are then averaged to compute a composite cortical SUVR for each participant. Higher composite cortical SUVR values indicate increased amyloid load, with negative changes in composite cortical SUVR over time indicating decreases in brain amyloid load.
[Part I (Base Study)] Percentage of Participants Achieving Responder StatusWeek 78The percentage of participants achieving responder status at week 78 was assessed. To determine which participants were considered responders, a linear regression was conducted at the participant level, yielding an estimated 78-week rate of change (i.e., a slope) for each participant with respect to ADAS-Cog and ADCS-ADL. To be declared a responder, a participant must have: 1) ADAS-Cog and ADCS-ADL observations at baseline and 78 weeks of treatment; 2) an ADAS-Cog slope \> 4.0 over 78 weeks, and 3) an ADCS-ADL slope \> -6.3 over 78 weeks. A participant failing to meet any of these criteria was designated as a non-responder at Week 78.
[Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) ScoreBaseline and week 78Least squares mean change from baseline at week 78 was assessed for NPI score. NPI is a clinical assessment of psychiatric status, covering 12 domains: delusion; hallucination; agitation/aggression; depression/dysphoria; anxiety; elation/euphoria; apathy/indifference; disinhibition; irritability/lability; aberrant motor behavior; sleep/nighttime behaviors; and appetite/eating disorders. Based on an interview of the participant's caregiver, each domain is assessed for symptom frequency \[range: 1 (occasional) to 4 (very frequent)\] and severity \[range: 1 (mild) to 3 (severe)\]. Domain scores \[range: 0 to 12\] are calculated as the product of the frequency and severity scores (i.e. frequency x severity); if no symptoms are present, domain score is 0. The 12 domain scores sum to a total NPI score \[range: 0 (no symptoms in any domain) to 144\]. Higher scores reflect more severe psychiatric impairment, with increases in impairment reflected by increases in NPI score.
[Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ScoreBaseline and week 78Least squares mean change from baseline at week 78 was assessed for MMSE score. The MMSE is a cognitive assessment of 5 domains including: orientation; attention; memory; language; and constructional praxis. These domains are assessed over the course of 11 total questions related to the participant. Participants are scored based on the number of correct responses; depending on the question, potential scores range from 0 (no correct response) to either 1 (4 questions), 2 (1 question), 3 (3 questions), or 5 (3 questions). Scores from each question are summed to the total MMSE score, with total scores ranging from 0-30. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance. Further, deterioration in cognitive performance would be reflected by decreases in MMSE score.
[Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) ScoreBaseline and week 78Least squares mean change from baseline at week 78 was assessed for CDR-SB score. The CDR-SB score is a clinical rating of global cognitive function, comprised of 6 domains including: memory; orientation; judgment and problem solving; community affairs; home and hobbies; and personal care. For each domain, the degree of impairment is assessed by a semi-structured interview of the participant as well as the participant's caregiver. For each domain, potential scores range from 0 (no impairment) to 3 (severe impairment). Scores from each individual domain are summed to the total CDR-SB score, with total scores ranging from 0-18. Higher scores indicate more severe cognitive impairment. Further, increases in cognitive impairment would be reflected by increases in CDR-SB score.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Part I began by enrolling approximately 50 participants per arm (200 total). Enrollment continued until the first 200 participants reached 13 weeks treatment; total enrollment at that time: \ 400. For these \ 400 participants (Safety Cohort), an interim analysis (IA) was conducted to assess safety. Following IA, enrollment continued (Main Cohort).

Pre-assignment details

2211 participants were randomized in Part I, with 2210 receiving treatment. As planned per protocol, no participants were randomized to the Verubecestat 60 mg arm (Arm C) in the Main Cohort. Participants completing Part I were eligible to continue to Part II. The trial was terminated early and did not complete as planned.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II]
\[Part I\] Verubecestat 12 mg once daily for 78 weeks in Study Part I (Base Study). \[Part II\] Participants completing Study Part I and continuing to Study Part II (Extension Study) receive Verubecestat 12 mg once daily for an additional 260 weeks.
703
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II]
\[Part I\] Verubecestat 40 mg once daily for 78 weeks in Study Part I (Base Study). \[Part II\] Participants completing Study Part I and continuing to Study Part II (Extension Study) receive Verubecestat 40 mg once daily for an additional 260 weeks.
700
Arm C. Verubecestat 60mg/40mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II]
\[Part I\] Verubecestat 60 mg once daily until the first IA in Study Part I (Base Study). Following IA, participants in this group were switched to Verubecestat 40 mg once daily, for the remainder of Study Part I (total dosing period: 78 weeks). \[Part II\] Participants completing Study Part I and continuing to Study Part II (Extension Study) receive Verubecestat 40 mg once daily for an additional 260 weeks.
103
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II]
\[Part I\] Placebo once daily for 78 weeks in Study Part I (Base Study). \[Part II\] Participants completing Study Part I and continuing to Study Part II (Extension Study) receive Verubecestat 40 mg once daily for an additional 260 weeks.
705
Total2,211

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Part I (Base Study)Adverse Event4152833
Part I (Base Study)Death10728
Part I (Base Study)Lack of Efficacy3807
Part I (Base Study)Lost to Follow-up4244
Part I (Base Study)Non-Compliance with Study Drug3200
Part I (Base Study)Participant Moved4317
Part I (Base Study)Physician Decision10714
Part I (Base Study)Protocol Violation2012
Part I (Base Study)Screen Failure2000
Part I (Base Study)Site Discontinued Study Participation1300
Part I (Base Study)Study Terminated by Sponsor7273086
Part I (Base Study)Trial Partner/Caregiver Withdrew Consent2725218
Part I (Base Study)Withdrawal by Subject2321720
Part II (Extension Study)Adverse Event1011726
Part II (Extension Study)Death3326
Part II (Extension Study)Lack of Efficacy1501
Part II (Extension Study)Lost to Follow-up3401
Part II (Extension Study)Non-Compliance with Study Drug0001
Part II (Extension Study)Participant Moved3303
Part II (Extension Study)Physician Decision711612
Part II (Extension Study)Study Terminated by Sponsor32931534323
Part II (Extension Study)Trial Partner/Caregiver Withdrew Consent1812816
Part II (Extension Study)Withdrawal by Subject5247

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II]TotalArm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II]Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II]Arm C. Verubecestat 60mg/40mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II]
[18F]Flutemetamol Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Standard Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR)0.89 SUVR
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
0.88 SUVR
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
0.88 SUVR
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.11
0.87 SUVR
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.11
Age, Continuous71.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
71.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
72.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
71.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
72.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score21.4 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
21.42 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.49
21.7 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
21.3 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
20.6 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Score63.0 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
62.74 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.93
62.1 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
62.9 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
63.5 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Total Tau Concentration206.7 picograms (pg)/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 90.4
232.2 picograms (pg)/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 137.3
246.2 picograms (pg)/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 192.9
231.5 picograms (pg)/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 113.9
268.6 picograms (pg)/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 136.2
Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score5.4 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
5.43 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.17
5.6 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
5.3 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
5.5 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score20.4 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
20.3 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
20.3 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
20.2 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
20.6 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Score8.7 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
8.64 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
9.2 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
8.2 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
6.9 Score on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants7 Participants3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
118 Participants369 Participants115 Participants125 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants30 Participants7 Participants13 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
4 Participants10 Participants0 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants16 Participants2 Participants8 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
566 Participants1779 Participants578 Participants547 Participants88 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
383 Participants1218 Participants376 Participants403 Participants56 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
320 Participants993 Participants329 Participants297 Participants47 Participants
Total Hippocampal Volume5894.1 Microliters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1231.5
5829.4 Microliters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1162.6
5800.7 Microliters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1069.2
5823.4 Microliters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1189.9
5653.5 Microliters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1148.4

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
9 / 70213 / 7003 / 1036 / 7056 / 3794 / 3654 / 618 / 394
other
Total, other adverse events
408 / 702440 / 70066 / 103337 / 705135 / 379102 / 36537 / 61144 / 394
serious
Total, serious adverse events
134 / 702162 / 70024 / 103121 / 70557 / 37956 / 36522 / 6169 / 394

Outcome results

Primary

[Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Score

Least squares mean change from baseline at week 78 was assessed for the ADCS-ADL score. The ADCS-ADL score measures the performance of activities of daily living, calculated from a 24-question survey. For each of the 24 questions, scores range from 0 (no independence) to (depending on the question) either 2 (1 question), 3 (17 questions), 4 (5 questions), or 5 (1 question), with higher scores indicating greater independence in activity performance. Scores from individual questions are summed into a total ADCS-ADL score, with total scores ranging from 0 to 78. Lower scores indicate less independence in activity performance and, as a result, greater AD severity. Further, increases in AD severity over time would be reflected by decreases in ADCS-ADL score.

Time frame: Baseline and week 78

Population: All randomized participants with a baseline and ≥1 within-analysis-window ADCS-ADL observation subsequent to ≥1 dose of study drug (FAS population). Per protocol, the 200 participants enrolled before IA (all arms) and all participants receiving 60mg Verubecestat (Arm C) were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Score-8.4 Score on a Scale
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Score-8.2 Score on a Scale
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Score-8.9 Score on a Scale
p-value: 0.492597.51% CI: [-1.1, 2.1]Longitudinal ANCOVA
p-value: 0.322197.51% CI: [-0.9, 2.3]Longitudinal ANCOVA
Primary

[Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score

Least squares mean change from baseline at week 78 was assessed for the ADAS-Cog score. ADAS-Cog measures cognition by assessing 11 metrics impaired in Alzheimer's Disease (AD): speech; speech comprehension; word finding; word recall; object/finger naming; orientation; obeying commands; ideational praxis; constructional praxis; word recognition; and remembering instruction. For each metric, scores range from 0 (no impairment) to (depending on the metric) either 5 (8 metrics), 8, 10, or 12 (1 metric each); higher scores indicate more severe impairment. Individual scores sum to a total ADAS-Cog score, ranging from 0-70. Higher total scores indicate greater cognitive impairment and AD severity. Further, increases in AD severity over time would be reflected by increases in ADAS-Cog score.

Time frame: Baseline and week 78

Population: All randomized participants with a baseline and ≥1 within-analysis-window ADAS-Cog observation subsequent to ≥1 dose of study drug (FAS population). Per protocol, the 200 participants enrolled before IA (all arms) and all participants receiving 60mg Verubecestat (Arm C) were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score7.9 Score on a Scale
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score8.0 Score on a Scale
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score7.7 Score on a Scale
p-value: 0.628797.51% CI: [-0.9, 1.3]Longitudinal ANCOVA
p-value: 0.462597.51% CI: [-0.8, 1.5]Longitudinal ANCOVA
Primary

[Part I (Base Study)] Number of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event

The number of participants discontinuing from study drug due to an AE in Part I was assessed. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.

Time frame: Up to week 78

Population: Includes all randomized participants in Part I receiving ≥1 dose of trial treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Number of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event57 Participants
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Number of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event64 Participants
Arm C. Verubecestat 60mg/40mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Number of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event12 Participants
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Number of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event42 Participants
Primary

[Part I (Base Study)] Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event

The number of participants experiencing an adverse event (AE) in Part I was assessed. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.

Time frame: Up to week 80 (up to 2 weeks following cessation of study treatment in Part I)

Population: Includes all randomized participants in Part I receiving ≥1 dose of trial treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event630 Participants
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event646 Participants
Arm C. Verubecestat 60mg/40mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event90 Participants
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event579 Participants
Primary

[Part II (Extension Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score

Mean change from baseline at week 104 was assessed for the ADAS-Cog score. ADAS-Cog measures cognition by assessing 11 metrics impaired in Alzheimer's Disease (AD): speech; speech comprehension; word finding; word recall; object/finger naming; orientation; obeying commands; ideational praxis; constructional praxis; word recognition; and remembering instruction. For each metric, scores range from 0 (no impairment) to (depending on the metric) either 5 (8 metrics), 8, 10, or 12 (1 metric each); higher scores indicate more severe impairment. Individual scores sum to a total ADAS-Cog score, ranging from 0-70. Higher total scores indicate greater cognitive impairment and AD severity. Further, increases in AD severity over time would be reflected by increases in ADAS-Cog score. Per study protocol, the baseline measurement to be used was the baseline measurement obtained in Part I.

Time frame: Baseline and week 104

Population: All randomized participants continuing to Part II, with a baseline and ≥1 within-analysis-window ADAS-Cog observation subsequent to ≥1 dose of study drug (FAS population), having an ADAS-Cog observation at week 104. Per protocol, the 200 participants enrolled before IA (all arms) and all participants receiving 60mg Verubecestat were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II][Part II (Extension Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score10.1 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part II (Extension Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score8.5 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II][Part II (Extension Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score9.6 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Primary

[Part II (Extension Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Score

Mean change from baseline at week 104 was assessed for the ADCS-ADL score. The ADCS-ADL score measures the performance of activities of daily living, calculated from a 24-question survey. For each of the 24 questions, scores range from 0 (no independence) to (depending on the question) either 2 (1 question), 3 (17 questions), 4 (5 questions), or 5 (1 question), with higher scores indicating greater independence in activity performance. Scores from individual questions are summed into a total ADCS-ADL score, with total scores ranging from 0 to 78. Lower scores indicate less independence in activity performance and, as a result, greater AD severity. Further, increases in AD severity over time would be reflected by decreases in ADCS-ADL score. Per study protocol, the baseline measurement to be used was the baseline measurement obtained in Part I.

Time frame: Baseline and week 104

Population: All randomized participants continuing to Part II, with a baseline and ≥1 within-analysis-window ADCS-ADL observation subsequent to ≥1 dose of study drug (FAS population), having an ADCS-ADL observation at week 104. Per protocol, the 200 participants enrolled before IA (all arms) and all participants receiving 60mg Verubecestat were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II][Part II (Extension Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Score-10.7 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 13.7
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part II (Extension Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Score-9.2 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.7
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II][Part II (Extension Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Score-9.3 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12
Primary

[Part II (Extension Study)] Number of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event

The number of participants discontinuing from study drug due to an AE in Part II was assessed. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.

Time frame: From week 78 (end of treatment in Part I) up to week 260 of Part II

Population: Includes all randomized participants continuing to Part II, receiving ≥1 dose of trial treatment in Part II. For included participants, the data reflect treatment discontinuations occurring in Part II only.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II][Part II (Extension Study)] Number of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event10 Participants
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part II (Extension Study)] Number of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event9 Participants
Arm C. Verubecestat 60mg/40mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part II (Extension Study)] Number of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event6 Participants
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II][Part II (Extension Study)] Number of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event29 Participants
Primary

[Part II (Extension Study)] Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event

The number of participants experiencing an adverse event (AE) in Part II was assessed. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.

Time frame: From week 78 (end of treatment in Part I) up to week 262 of Part II

Population: Includes all randomized participants continuing to Part II, receiving ≥1 dose of trial treatment in Part II. For included participants, the data reflect AEs occurring in Part II only.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II][Part II (Extension Study)] Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event240 Participants
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part II (Extension Study)] Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event230 Participants
Arm C. Verubecestat 60mg/40mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part II (Extension Study)] Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event51 Participants
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II][Part II (Extension Study)] Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event264 Participants
Secondary

[Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score

Least squares mean change from baseline at week 78 was assessed for CDR-SB score. The CDR-SB score is a clinical rating of global cognitive function, comprised of 6 domains including: memory; orientation; judgment and problem solving; community affairs; home and hobbies; and personal care. For each domain, the degree of impairment is assessed by a semi-structured interview of the participant as well as the participant's caregiver. For each domain, potential scores range from 0 (no impairment) to 3 (severe impairment). Scores from each individual domain are summed to the total CDR-SB score, with total scores ranging from 0-18. Higher scores indicate more severe cognitive impairment. Further, increases in cognitive impairment would be reflected by increases in CDR-SB score.

Time frame: Baseline and week 78

Population: All randomized participants with a baseline and ≥1 within-analysis-window CDR-SB observation subsequent to ≥1 dose of study drug (FAS population). Per protocol, the 200 participants enrolled before IA (all arms) and all participants receiving 60mg Verubecestat (Arm C) were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score2.1 Score on a Scale
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score2.1 Score on a Scale
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score2.1 Score on a Scale
p-value: 0.842697.51% CI: [-0.4, 0.3]Longitudinal ANCOVA
p-value: 0.826497.51% CI: [-0.3, 0.4]Longitudinal ANCOVA
Secondary

[Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Cortical Amyloid Load Assessed by [18F]Flutemetamol PET Standard Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR)

Least squares mean change from baseline at week 78 was calculated for SUVR, a measure of brain cortical amyloid load. Per protocol, SUVR was analyzed as part of a substudy in Part I, with testing occurring only at select trial sites. Participants receive the PET tracer \[18F\]Flutemetamol (IV). After 90 minutes, participants receive 4 PET scans (5 minutes each in duration). Using these PET scan images, specific brain ROIs (frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes; anterior and posterior cingulate and precuneus) are used to calculate regional SUVRs, defined as the relative ratio of pixel intensities at a specific ROI compared to a reference region (RR; subcortical white matter). These regional SUVRs are then averaged to compute a composite cortical SUVR for each participant. Higher composite cortical SUVR values indicate increased amyloid load, with negative changes in composite cortical SUVR over time indicating decreases in brain amyloid load.

Time frame: Baseline and week 78

Population: All randomized participants with a baseline and ≥1 within-analysis-window SUVR observation subsequent to ≥1 dose of study drug (FAS population). Per protocol, the 200 participants enrolled prior to IA (all arms) and all participants receiving 60mg Verubecestat did not receive SUVR testing and were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Cortical Amyloid Load Assessed by [18F]Flutemetamol PET Standard Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR)-0.02 SUVR
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Cortical Amyloid Load Assessed by [18F]Flutemetamol PET Standard Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR)-0.04 SUVR
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Cortical Amyloid Load Assessed by [18F]Flutemetamol PET Standard Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR)0.00 SUVR
p-value: 0.006695% CI: [-0.05, 0]Longitudinal ANCOVA
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.06, -0.02]Longitudinal ANCOVA
Secondary

[Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score

Least squares mean change from baseline at week 78 was assessed for MMSE score. The MMSE is a cognitive assessment of 5 domains including: orientation; attention; memory; language; and constructional praxis. These domains are assessed over the course of 11 total questions related to the participant. Participants are scored based on the number of correct responses; depending on the question, potential scores range from 0 (no correct response) to either 1 (4 questions), 2 (1 question), 3 (3 questions), or 5 (3 questions). Scores from each question are summed to the total MMSE score, with total scores ranging from 0-30. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance. Further, deterioration in cognitive performance would be reflected by decreases in MMSE score.

Time frame: Baseline and week 78

Population: All randomized participants with a baseline and ≥1 within-analysis-window MMSE observation subsequent to ≥1 dose of study drug (FAS population). Per protocol, the 200 participants enrolled prior to IA (all arms) and all participants receiving 60mg Verubecestat (Arm C) were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score-3.9 Score on a Scale
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score-3.6 Score on a Scale
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score-4.1 Score on a Scale
p-value: 0.472195% CI: [-0.3, 0.7]Longitudinal ANCOVA
p-value: 0.059995% CI: [0, 1]Longitudinal ANCOVA
Secondary

[Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Score

Least squares mean change from baseline at week 78 was assessed for NPI score. NPI is a clinical assessment of psychiatric status, covering 12 domains: delusion; hallucination; agitation/aggression; depression/dysphoria; anxiety; elation/euphoria; apathy/indifference; disinhibition; irritability/lability; aberrant motor behavior; sleep/nighttime behaviors; and appetite/eating disorders. Based on an interview of the participant's caregiver, each domain is assessed for symptom frequency \[range: 1 (occasional) to 4 (very frequent)\] and severity \[range: 1 (mild) to 3 (severe)\]. Domain scores \[range: 0 to 12\] are calculated as the product of the frequency and severity scores (i.e. frequency x severity); if no symptoms are present, domain score is 0. The 12 domain scores sum to a total NPI score \[range: 0 (no symptoms in any domain) to 144\]. Higher scores reflect more severe psychiatric impairment, with increases in impairment reflected by increases in NPI score.

Time frame: Baseline and week 78

Population: All randomized participants with a baseline and ≥1 within-analysis-window NPI observation subsequent to ≥1 dose of study drug (FAS population). Per protocol, the 200 participants enrolled prior to IA (all arms) and all participants receiving 60mg Verubecestat (Arm C) were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Score3.4 Score on a Scale
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Score3.8 Score on a Scale
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Score2.7 Score on a Scale
p-value: 0.294995% CI: [-0.6, 2.1]Longitudinal ANCOVA
p-value: 0.137295% CI: [-0.4, 2.6]Longitudinal ANCOVA
Secondary

[Part I (Base Study)] Fold Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Total Tau

Least squares mean fold change from baseline at week 78 was calculated for Total Tau concentration in CSF, a measure of brain tau pathology. Per protocol, CSF Total Tau concentration was analyzed as part of a substudy in Part I, with testing occurring only at select trial sites. Least squares mean fold change from baseline \>1 indicates increased Total Tau concentration in the CSF.

Time frame: Baseline and week 78

Population: All randomized participants with a baseline and ≥1 within-analysis-window CSF Total Tau observation subsequent to ≥1 dose of study drug (FAS population). Per protocol, the 200 participants enrolled prior to IA (all arms) and all participants receiving 60mg Verubecestat (Arm C) were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Fold Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Total Tau1.02 Fold Change
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Fold Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Total Tau1.04 Fold Change
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Fold Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Total Tau1.07 Fold Change
p-value: 0.213895% CI: [0.87, 1.04]Longitudinal ANCOVA
p-value: 0.43395% CI: [0.9, 1.05]Longitudinal ANCOVA
Secondary

[Part I (Base Study)] Percentage of Participants Achieving Responder Status

The percentage of participants achieving responder status at week 78 was assessed. To determine which participants were considered responders, a linear regression was conducted at the participant level, yielding an estimated 78-week rate of change (i.e., a slope) for each participant with respect to ADAS-Cog and ADCS-ADL. To be declared a responder, a participant must have: 1) ADAS-Cog and ADCS-ADL observations at baseline and 78 weeks of treatment; 2) an ADAS-Cog slope \> 4.0 over 78 weeks, and 3) an ADCS-ADL slope \> -6.3 over 78 weeks. A participant failing to meet any of these criteria was designated as a non-responder at Week 78.

Time frame: Week 78

Population: All randomized participants in Part I receiving ≥1 dose of trial treatment. Per protocol, the first 200 participants enrolled prior to IA (across all arms) and all participants receiving 60mg Verubecestat (Arm C) were excluded from analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Percentage of Participants Achieving Responder Status20.1 Percentage of Participants
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Percentage of Participants Achieving Responder Status19.6 Percentage of Participants
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Percentage of Participants Achieving Responder Status19.3 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

[Part I (Base Study)] Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hippocampal Volume (THV)

Least squares mean percent change from baseline at week 78 was calculated for Total Hippocampal Volume (THV) as measured by volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (vMRI). Longitudinal analysis of within-participant THV is computed using a change analysis algorithm using tensor-based morphometry. This technique produces one measure of volume change calculated from the registration of serial vMRI scans at the follow-up time point relative to baseline. Negative percent changes from baseline indicate decreases in THV (i.e. increased hippocampal atrophy).

Time frame: Baseline and week 78

Population: All randomized participants with a baseline and ≥1 within-analysis-window THV observation subsequent to ≥1 dose of study drug (FAS population). Per protocol, the 200 participants enrolled prior to IA (all arms) and all participants receiving 60mg Verubecestat (Arm C) were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hippocampal Volume (THV)-5.6 Percent Change
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hippocampal Volume (THV)-5.7 Percent Change
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II][Part I (Base Study)] Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hippocampal Volume (THV)-5.0 Percent Change
p-value: 0.000597.51% CI: [-1, -0.2]Longitudinal ANCOVA
p-value: 0.000297.51% CI: [-1.1, -0.3]Longitudinal ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026