Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Conditions
Keywords
Proliferative Diabetic retinopathy, Pan-retinal photocoagulation
Brief summary
To determine the safety and efficacy of a single session of low-fluence panretinal photocoagulation when compared to full-fluence PRP. Hypothesis: a single-session of low-fluence PRP will be safe regarding the progression of macular edema and the presence of adverse events, and will efficiently induce regression of neovascularization.
Interventions
To administer low-fluence PRP in a single session for PDR
To administer full-fluence PRP in two sessions for PDR
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Type 1 or type 2 diabetics * Proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Exclusion criteria
* Previous treatment with PRP * Media opacities * Previous treatment for macular edema (LASER or intravitreal injections) * Recent (less than 6 months) ophthalmic surgery * Only eyes * Intra-retinal or sub-retinal fluid with foveal involvement * Chronic renal failure * History of liver or pancreatic transplant
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Macular thickness change | Base-line, 1 week, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks | Measurement of macular thickness changes by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Adverse events | 16 weeks | Presence or absence of adverse events |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Regression of neovessels, change over time | Base-line, 1 week, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks | Regression of neovessels observed by fluorescein angiography |
Countries
Mexico