Skip to content

PET/CT and Lymph Node Mapping in Finding Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With High-Risk Endometrial Cancer

Prospective Evaluation of Lymph Node Metastasis at the Time of Surgical Staging for High Risk Endometrial Cancer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01737619
Enrollment
101
Registered
2012-11-29
Start date
2013-04-03
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2025-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometrial Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma, Endometrial Mixed Adenocarcinoma, Endometrial Serous Adenocarcinoma, Grade 3 Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma, Malignant Mixed Mesodermal (Mullerian) Tumor

Brief summary

This clinical trial studies positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and lymph node mapping in finding lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer that is at high risk of spreading. A PET/CT scan is a procedure that combines the pictures from a PET scan and a CT scan, which are taken at the same time from the same machine. The combined scans give more detailed pictures of areas inside the body than either scan gives by itself. Lymph node mapping uses a radioactive dye, called indocyanine green solution, to identify lymph nodes that may contain cancer cells. PET/CT and sentinel lymph node mapping may be better ways than surgery to identify cancer in the lymph nodes.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate the false negative rate of PET/CT and/or sentinel lymph node mapping in the detection of positive lymph nodes in women with high risk endometrial cancers. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PET/CT and/or sentinel lymph node mapping in the detection of positive lymph nodes in women with high risk endometrial cancer. II. To determine if a molecular panel of estrogen-induced genes that we have previously identified from retrospective studies correlate with extra-uterine spread including lymph node metastasis at the time of surgical staging for endometrial cancer. III. To prospectively identify patterns of lymphatic spread of endometrial cancer. IV. To correlate cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) and WAP four-disulfide core domain 2 (HE4) levels with disease metastasis at the time of surgical staging and to explore the use of other serum biomarkers to predict recurrence. V. To prospectively collect morbidity and mortality data related to performing lymph node dissection including intra-operative and postoperative complications. VI. To determine whether metabolic parameters of the primary endometrial tumor on PET including tumor intensity (maximum standard uptake value \[SUV\] and peak SUV), metabolic tumor volume (obtained at a threshold of 40% of maximum and at a threshold of SUV=3), and total lesion glycolysis (expressed average SUV over the metabolic tumor volume) are predictive of locoregional or metastatic spread, and whether these parameters correlate with CA-125 and HE4 levels. OUTLINE: Patients undergo PET/CT prior to surgery. Patients then undergo intraoperative lymph node mapping with indocyanine green solution, given via superficial and deep cervical injection during full lymphadenectomy.

Interventions

PROCEDUREComputed Tomography

Undergo PET/CT

Given via superficial and deep cervical injection

OTHERLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

Undergo lymph node mapping

PROCEDURELymphadenectomy

Undergo full lymphadenectomy

PROCEDUREPositron Emission Tomography

Undergo PET/CT

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed high grade endometrial cancer including grade 3 endometroid, serous, clear cell, malignant mixed Mullerian tumor (MMMT) or any mixed tumor containing one of these cell types * Patients with a grade 1/2 tumors and evidence of deep myometrial invasion or cervical involvement on preoperative imaging or physical exam * Candidate for surgery * No evidence of peritoneal disease on preoperative imaging * Negative pregnancy test if of child-bearing age * No preoperative treatment for endometrial cancer including radiation or chemotherapy * Previous hormonal therapy is allowed

Exclusion criteria

* Medical co-morbidities making surgery unsafe, as determined by the primary treating physician * Any contraindications to PET/CT or lymph node mapping (inability to control serum glucose to a value of =\< 200 mg/dl for fludeoxyglucose F-18 \[FDG\]-PET/CT) * Does not meet histologic criteria * Evidence of peritoneal or distant metastasis on preoperative imaging * Baseline creatinine (necessary for imaging studies)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
False Negative Rate of PET/CT Verses Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in the Detection of Positive Lymph Nodes in Women With High Risk Endometrial Cancers.36 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
False Negative Rate and False Negative Predictive Values of Lymphatic Spread of Endometrial Spread of Endometrial Lymph Nodes From a PET/CT Versus Lymphatic Mapping Procedure36 months
Mortality Rate of Patients Undergoing Lymph Node Dissection Including Intra-operative and Postoperative Complications36 monthsMortality percentage of patients following the lymph node mapping procedure and postoperative complications.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was active from April 2013 until May 2016 and all recruitments were done in a medical clinic setting.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sentinel Node Mapping
Pre-op PET/CT scan followed by intraoperative sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy then complete pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy
101
Total101

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSentinel Node Mapping
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
37 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
64 Participants
Age, Continuous62 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
22 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
60 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
63 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
101 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
101 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 101
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 101
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 101

Outcome results

Primary

False Negative Rate of PET/CT Verses Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in the Detection of Positive Lymph Nodes in Women With High Risk Endometrial Cancers.

Time frame: 36 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sentinel Node MappingFalse Negative Rate of PET/CT Verses Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in the Detection of Positive Lymph Nodes in Women With High Risk Endometrial Cancers., sensitivity of sentinel lymph node mapping95 percentage
Sentinel Node MappingFalse Negative Rate of PET/CT Verses Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in the Detection of Positive Lymph Nodes in Women With High Risk Endometrial Cancers.false negative rate5 percentage
Sentinel Node MappingFalse Negative Rate of PET/CT Verses Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in the Detection of Positive Lymph Nodes in Women With High Risk Endometrial Cancers.false negative predictive value1.4 percentage
Secondary

False Negative Rate and False Negative Predictive Values of Lymphatic Spread of Endometrial Spread of Endometrial Lymph Nodes From a PET/CT Versus Lymphatic Mapping Procedure

Time frame: 36 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sentinel Node MappingFalse Negative Rate and False Negative Predictive Values of Lymphatic Spread of Endometrial Spread of Endometrial Lymph Nodes From a PET/CT Versus Lymphatic Mapping Procedurefalse negative rate4.3 percentage
Sentinel Node MappingFalse Negative Rate and False Negative Predictive Values of Lymphatic Spread of Endometrial Spread of Endometrial Lymph Nodes From a PET/CT Versus Lymphatic Mapping Procedurefalse negative predictive value1.4 percentage
Secondary

Mortality Rate of Patients Undergoing Lymph Node Dissection Including Intra-operative and Postoperative Complications

Mortality percentage of patients following the lymph node mapping procedure and postoperative complications.

Time frame: 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sentinel Node MappingMortality Rate of Patients Undergoing Lymph Node Dissection Including Intra-operative and Postoperative Complications0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026