Skip to content

Comparison Between White Light Endoscopy and Bright Narrow Band Imaging in Diagnosis Colonic Adenomas.

A Randomised Comparison Between White Light Endoscopy (WLE) and Bright Narrow Band Imaging (B-NBI) in the Diagnosis of Colonic Adenomas in Asymptomatic Subjects Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy.

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01737567
Acronym
WLEvB-NBI
Enrollment
0
Registered
2012-11-29
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2025-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonic Adenomas

Brief summary

Removal of colorectal adenomas prevents the occurence of colorectal cancers. The use of chromo-endoscopy has been shown to improve the detection of flat adenomas. Narrow band imaging enables endoscopists to accurately describe the pit pattern of adenomas. By comparing White Light Endoscopy and Bright Narrow Band Imaging it will show if there is any comparable advantage to using one or the other for lesion detection and assessment.

Detailed description

Removal of colorectal adenomas prevents occurrence of cancers \[1\]. It is recognized that colonoscopy can miss colorectal adenomas and early cancers \[2\]. There is a need to further improve performance of colonoscopy. The use of chromoendoscopy has been shown to improve detection of flat adenomas \[3\]. Narrow band imaging was introduced in year 2006. It is similar to chromoendoscopy in that it provides more mucosal details. This enables endoscopists to accurately describe the pit pattern of adenomas. NBI has been used as a substitute to chromoendoscopy. In pooled analysis, NBI is comparable to chromoendoscopy in their sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of malignant colorectal adenomas \[4\]. Unfortunately, the use of NBI has not been shown to conclusively improve rate of colorectal adenoma detection. Two of 3 randomized trials that compared WLE to NBI showed a higher adenoma detection rate with the use of NBI \[5, 6\]. In a study by Rex et al., the rate was however similar with either modality. In a pooled analysis, NBI was only marginally better than WLE \[7\]. The effective use of NBI depends on the quality of bowel preparation and the experience of endoscopist. In the presence of fecal matters, NBI tends to be dark and detection of small adenomas becomes difficult. The prototype bright NBI coupled with high definition resolution is likely to overcome this drawback of original NBI.

Interventions

OTHERBright Narrow Band Imaging.

Using Bright Narrow Band Imaging to detect colonic adenomas.

Use of White Light Endoscopy to detect colonic adenomas.

Sponsors

Professor Michael Bourke
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Asymptomatic subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy, age \> 50, average risk subjects and, ability to provide a written consent to trial participation.

Exclusion criteria

* personal history of inflammatory bowel disease, colon adenoma or cancer * family history of FAP or Familial nonpolyposis syndrome * first degree relatives having diagnosed to have colorectal carcinoma * no colonoscopy in past 5 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in detection of colorectal adenomas.One yearIt is anticipated that colorectal adenomas will be more easily identifiable using Bright Narrow Band Imaging.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement of histological predictionOne yearIt is anticipated that the use of Bright Narrow Band Imaging will significantly improve the histological detection of colonic adenomas when detected as opposed to White Light Endoscopy.

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026