Skip to content

Title: Development and Implementation of Innovative Auditory Training Methods and Verification of These Training Methods

Title: Development and Implementation of Innovative Auditory Training Methods and Verification of These Training Methods

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01737489
Enrollment
17
Registered
2012-11-29
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2017-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cochlear Implant

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if aural rehabilitation adds measurable benefit and participant satisfaction to a cochlear implant recipient's overall treatment. Also, the study is designed to compare the efficacy of a commercially available aural rehabilitation program (LACE) and an electronic program which takes advantage of a traditional form of auditory training (NOOK) for cochlear implant users.

Detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to determine if aural rehabilitation adds measurable benefit and participant satisfaction to a cochlear implant recipient's overall treatment. The secondary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of a commercially available aural rehabilitation program (LACE) and an electronic program which takes advantage of a traditional form of auditory training (NOOK) for cochlear implant users.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALLACE

commercially available LACE program which is administered by computer as daily lessons. The participants will do this program for one month

BEHAVIORALNOOK

will use an electronic reader (Barnes and Noble - NOOK device) to do speech tracking.will do this activity for approximately one hour per day for five days out of seven for a total of four weeks. The speech tracking activity will involve reading approximately two books within the one month time frame. The participants will listen to the book while reading an unabridged book in printed form.

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Criteria for Inclusion: * Willingness to participate * Ability to provide informed written consent * Willingness to follow study protocol * Eighteen years or older at the time of signing the consent form * Cochlear implant experience for 12 months or greater * Spoken English as the first language * Access to a home computer which meets the minimal requirements to run appropriate program or the ability to use an electronic reader depending on which group the participant is assigned to. * Reports being comfortable using a computer if in the LACE group Criteria for Exclusion: * Unable or unwillingness to sign informed written consent * Unable or unwillingness to follow study protocol * Non-English speaking or English as a second language * No access to a computer if assigned to the LACE study group * Reports not being comfortable using a computer if assigned to the LACE study group.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Word recognitionbaseline to 6 monthsWord recognition will be measured using the Consonant Nucleus Consonant (CNC) Test, a 50 word open set test.
Signal-to-noise ratiobaseline to 6 monthsThe signal to noise ratio will be measured using the Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of speech comprehensionbaseline to 6 monthsPercent of speech comprehension will be measured by the AzBio Sentence Lists, which were created at Arizona State University and evaluate speech understanding.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026