Skip to content

Improving Outcomes After PICU Admission: A Pilot Study

A Psycho-educational Intervention to Improve Family Mental Health and Child Educational Outcomes Following Admission to PICU: A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01737021
Enrollment
31
Registered
2012-11-29
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2022-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Keywords

PICU, Critical illness, Outcomes, Mental health, Education, Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT), Pilot, Feasibility

Brief summary

1. Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of an information based intervention delivered to parents following their child's admission to paediatric intensive care; 2. Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the study design and procedures; 3. Explore the effects of the intervention on parent and child psychological outcomes 3-6 months post discharge from PICU; 4. Explore the effects of parental stress experienced during PICU admission on the effectiveness of the intervention; 5. To provide data that, combined with results from other studies, could inform the sample size for a future multi-site RCT.

Detailed description

Most children are now expected to make a complete medical recovery following admission to PICU. However, research suggests that some children will go on to develop psychological difficulties, such as problems with emotions, behaviour, and learning. In addition, parents themselves may suffer with emotional difficulties. Although the follow-up of survivors is recommended, there are currently no specific guidelines in place. Intervention in the early stages of recovery could help families pull through without long lasting after-effects.

Interventions

The information given to parents will cover expected reactions that follow a PICU admission; how parents can help their child cope with these reactions; how to recognise warning signs; and sign-posting of appropriate follow-up services (if relevant). There will also be a follow-up telephone call to reinforce the information and to support parents in putting it in to practice, if appropriate.

Sponsors

Children of St Mary's Intensive Care
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Imperial College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Unplanned emergency admissions to PICU for at least 12 hours * Parent or primary carer speaks and can read English

Exclusion criteria

* Child dies whilst on ward * Child discharged with a terminal illness * Child has had multiple PICU admission in the past * Staff feel it is inappropriate to approach family * Family live overseas

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Number of Feasibility Criteria Successfully Met3-6 months post discharge from PICUFeasibility success criteria have been defined a priori for the intervention and study design. There are six feasibility criteria related to the intervention, covering aspects of the timing of the intervention, compliance, and evaluation. There are also six feasibility criteria related to the study design, covering recruitment rate; participation rate; acceptability of procedures; attrition rate; and the time-scale of data collection. Dependent on the number of criteria successfully met, the following classification will be used: \* 0-2/6 criteria met - Stop; intervention and/or study design not feasible. \* 3-4/6 criteria met - Continue with modifications; feasible intervention and/or study design with modifications. \* 5/6 criteria met - Continue without modifications, but monitor closely; feasible intervention and/or study design with close monitoring. \* 6/6 criteria met - Continue without modifications; feasible intervention and/or study design as is.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Impact of Events Scale (IES)3-6 months post discharge from PICUValidated measure of post-traumatic stress symptoms in the parent.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)3-6 months post discharge from PICUValidated measure of anxiety and depression in the parent.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Psycho-educational Intervention
Received psycho-educational intervention.
17
Treatment as Usual
There is no existing standard follow up for parents of children discharged from PICU.
6
Total23

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up53

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPsycho-educational InterventionTreatment as UsualTotal
Age, Continuous6.00 years9.00 years6.00 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants3 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 220 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

The Number of Feasibility Criteria Successfully Met

Feasibility success criteria have been defined a priori for the intervention and study design. There are six feasibility criteria related to the intervention, covering aspects of the timing of the intervention, compliance, and evaluation. There are also six feasibility criteria related to the study design, covering recruitment rate; participation rate; acceptability of procedures; attrition rate; and the time-scale of data collection. Dependent on the number of criteria successfully met, the following classification will be used: \* 0-2/6 criteria met - Stop; intervention and/or study design not feasible. \* 3-4/6 criteria met - Continue with modifications; feasible intervention and/or study design with modifications. \* 5/6 criteria met - Continue without modifications, but monitor closely; feasible intervention and/or study design with close monitoring. \* 6/6 criteria met - Continue without modifications; feasible intervention and/or study design as is.

Time frame: 3-6 months post discharge from PICU

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
InterventionThe Number of Feasibility Criteria Successfully Met3 Number of criteria successfully met
Study DesignThe Number of Feasibility Criteria Successfully Met1 Number of criteria successfully met
Secondary

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

Validated measure of anxiety and depression in the parent.

Time frame: 3-6 months post discharge from PICU

Secondary

Impact of Events Scale (IES)

Validated measure of post-traumatic stress symptoms in the parent.

Time frame: 3-6 months post discharge from PICU

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026