Skip to content

S-ICD® System Post Approval Study

Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (S-ICD®) System Post Approval Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01736618
Enrollment
1766
Registered
2012-11-29
Start date
2013-03-12
Completion date
2021-10-15
Last updated
2024-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Arrest, Secondary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

subcutaneous implantable defibrillator, post approval study, sudden cardiac arrest, Cameron Health defibrillator

Brief summary

The purpose of the S-ICD Post Approval Study is to document long term safety and effectiveness outcomes associated with the implantation of the SQ-RX pulse generator and Q-TRAK electrode in a commercial clinical setting.

Detailed description

The S-ICD Post Approval Study is a non-randomized registry that will retrospectively enroll subjects who participated in the S-ICD Clinical Investigation (IDE G090013) and prospectively enroll new candidates for the S-ICD System. The target enrollment sample size is 1,616 subjects at up to 150 investigational sites to achieve 1,025 subjects in the analysis cohort at 60 months. * The primary safety endpoint of the study is the Type I (caused by the S-ICD System) Complication Free Rate at 60 months compared to a performance goal of 85%. * The primary effectiveness endpoint is the Overall Shock Effectiveness in Converting Spontaneous Discrete Episodes of ventricular tachycardia /ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) through 60 months compared to a performance goal of 94%. * The secondary safety endpoint of the study is the Electrode-Related Complication Free Rate at 60 months compared to a performance goal of 92.5%. * The secondary effectiveness endpoint is First Shock Effectiveness in Converting Induced (Acute) and Spontaneous Discrete Episodes of VT/VF through 60 months compared to a performance goal of 84.0%. Additional objectives include characterization of long term safety and effectiveness in subjects of varied body habitus and in traditionally underrepresented populations. Subjects must meet the following criteria to be eligible for inclusion in the study: 1. Eligible for implantation with an S-ICD System, OR previously implanted with an S-ICD System in the S-ICD System Clinical Investigation (IDE G090013) 2. Willing and able to provide written informed consent or have informed consent provided by a legal representative Subjects who meet the following criteria must be excluded from the study: 1\. Remaining life expectancy of less than 360 days Enrolled subjects will be followed at the implant procedure, pre-discharge and annual (±60 days) follow-up visits. Subjects are followed according to the standard of care at their participating investigational center. The primary and secondary safety and effectiveness endpoints will include a compilation of S-ICD IDE study and S-ICD PAS study subject data

Interventions

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Eligible for implantation with an S-ICD System, OR previously implanted with an S-ICD System in the S-ICD System Clinical Investigation (IDE G090013) AND * Willing and able to provide written informed consent or have informed consent provided by a legal representative

Exclusion criteria

* Remaining life expectancy of less than 360 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Free From Type I Complication60 months (1800 days)Type I complications are adverse events caused by a component of the S-ICD System (i.e. pulse generator, electrode, EIT or programmer) that results in permanent loss of device function, invasive intervention or death.
Overall Shock Effectiveness in Converting Spontaneous Discrete Episodes of VT/VF60 months (1825 days)Overall shock effectiveness refers to conversion of an episode following on any of the 5 shocks (maximum) that may be delivered during a single episode. Discrete episodes of VT/VF are those that are temporally independent (\<3 within a 24 hour period), unlike storm episodes, which occur in clusters (≥3 episodes within a 24 hour period). Episodes that spontaneously terminate will be excluded from this endpoint since the effectiveness of the shock cannot be evaluated in such circumstances.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Free From Electrode-related Complications60 months (1800 days)The electrode related complications analyzed for this end-point include: complications occurring less than or equal to 30 days post implant that are attributable to structural electrode failure for electrode movement, electrode impendence out of range, electrode conductor fracture, deformation or breakage or insulation failure; OR occurring greater than 30 days post implant regardless of structural failure for electrode movement, electrode impendence out of range, electrode conductor fracture, deformation/breakage or insulation failure; OR occurring greater than 30 days post implant attributable to structural electrode failure for incomplete/improper header connection, in-subject damage to electrode, electrode revision to optimize therapy, electrode movement, infection, oversensing/undersensing. Additionally, a complication is an adverse event that results in permanent loss of device function, invasive intervention or death.
First Shock Effectiveness in Converting Induced (Acute) and Spontaneous Discrete Episodes of VT/VF60 months (1825 days)The rate in first shock effectiveness in converting induced (acute) and spontaneous discrete episodes of VT/VF through 60 months (1825 days) is calculated as the number of successful first shock conversions divided by the total evaluable episodes Acute Tests included: S-ICD PAS Study: Acute tests include induced episodes during the initial implant hospitalization after enrollment. Inductions may have been done on different days, but all occurred before the patient was discharged after initial implant; IDE Study : Acute tests included induced episodes occurring during the initial implant procedure as well as subsequent hospitalization until the final system position was obtained. * Acute Test Shock Energy Levels included all energy levels in the PAS Study and only 65 Joule shocks in the IDE Study. * Acute Test Arrhythmias included all VT and VF episodes for the PAS Study and only VF episodes for the IDE Study.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
S-ICD System Implant Attempt
All subjects undergo an S-ICD System implant procedure.
1,766
Total1,766

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyChange in indication or condition78
Overall StudyDeath294
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up193
Overall StudyPhysician Decision33
Overall StudyStudy device explant103
Overall StudySubject unable to be followed at study location223
Overall StudyTransplant or removal of target organ19
Overall StudyUnable to complete implant2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject54

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicS-ICD System Implant Attempt
Age, Continuous53.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
Body Mass Index29.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
Creatinine Level1.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
Device Indication
Primary prevention
1359 Participants
Device Indication
Secondary prevention
407 Participants
History of Atrial Fibrillation732 Participants
History of Cancer28 Participants
History of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)284 Participants
History of Diabetes592 Participants
History of Hypertension1089 Participants
History of Kidney Disease432 Participants
History of Myocardial Infarction582 Participants
History of Percutaneous Revascularization484 Participants
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction32.3 % of LV volume ejected per heart beat
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race and Ethnicity
American Indian or Alaska Native
16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race and Ethnicity
Asian
22 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race and Ethnicity
Black, of African heritage
508 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race and Ethnicity
Caucasian
1048 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race and Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
104 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race and Ethnicity
Multi-racial
9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race and Ethnicity
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race and Ethnicity
Not Disclosed
46 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race and Ethnicity
Other
5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1766 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
542 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1224 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
294 / 1,766
other
Total, other adverse events
247 / 1,766
serious
Total, serious adverse events
638 / 1,766

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Free From Type I Complication

Type I complications are adverse events caused by a component of the S-ICD System (i.e. pulse generator, electrode, EIT or programmer) that results in permanent loss of device function, invasive intervention or death.

Time frame: 60 months (1800 days)

Population: S-ICD PAS enrolled de novo implant subjects as well as prior IDE participants. Primary Safety endpoint includes subjects enrolled in S-ICD PAS combined with the subjects from the S-ICD IDE (NCT# 01064076). S-ICD PAS had 1643 de novo implant attempts and 123 prior IDE implant subjects, for endpoint analyses this was combined with the data from the 198 IDE implant attempt subjects that did not participate in S-ICD PAS, totaling 1964 subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
S-ICD System Implant AttemptNumber of Participants Free From Type I Complication1869 Participants
Comparison: Ho: The Type I Complication Free Rate at 60 months (p1) does not exceed the performance goal of 85.0%.~Ho: p1 ≤ 85.0% Ha: The Type I Complication Free Rate at 60 months (p1) does exceed the performance goal of 85.0%.~Ha: p1 \> 85.0% The null hypothesis will be rejected if the lower one-sided 95% confidence bound of the proportional means model estimate, using the Peto method for standard error, exceeds the performance goal of 85.0%.
Primary

Overall Shock Effectiveness in Converting Spontaneous Discrete Episodes of VT/VF

Overall shock effectiveness refers to conversion of an episode following on any of the 5 shocks (maximum) that may be delivered during a single episode. Discrete episodes of VT/VF are those that are temporally independent (\<3 within a 24 hour period), unlike storm episodes, which occur in clusters (≥3 episodes within a 24 hour period). Episodes that spontaneously terminate will be excluded from this endpoint since the effectiveness of the shock cannot be evaluated in such circumstances.

Time frame: 60 months (1825 days)

Population: Primary effectiveness endpoint includes subjects in S-ICD PAS combined with the subjects from the S-ICD IDE (NCT# 01064076). S-ICD PAS had 1637 de novo implants and 123 prior IDE implant subjects, for endpoint analyses this was combined with the data from the 191 IDE implanted subjects that did not participate in S-ICD PAS, totaling 1951 subjects. This endpoint analyzes all appropriate shocks.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
S-ICD System Implant AttemptOverall Shock Effectiveness in Converting Spontaneous Discrete Episodes of VT/VF505 S-ICD Shocks
Comparison: Ho: Overall Shock Effectiveness in Converting Spontaneous Discrete Episodes of VT/VF through 60 months (p1) does not exceed the performance goal of 94.0%.~Ho: p1 ≤ 94.0% Ha: Overall Shock Effectiveness in Converting Spontaneous Discrete Episodes of VT/VF through 60 months (p1) does exceed the performance goal of 94.0%.~Ha: p1 \>94.0% The null hypothesis will be rejected if the lower one-sided 95% exact confidence bound of the estimate exceeds the performance goal of 94.0%.
Secondary

First Shock Effectiveness in Converting Induced (Acute) and Spontaneous Discrete Episodes of VT/VF

The rate in first shock effectiveness in converting induced (acute) and spontaneous discrete episodes of VT/VF through 60 months (1825 days) is calculated as the number of successful first shock conversions divided by the total evaluable episodes Acute Tests included: S-ICD PAS Study: Acute tests include induced episodes during the initial implant hospitalization after enrollment. Inductions may have been done on different days, but all occurred before the patient was discharged after initial implant; IDE Study : Acute tests included induced episodes occurring during the initial implant procedure as well as subsequent hospitalization until the final system position was obtained. * Acute Test Shock Energy Levels included all energy levels in the PAS Study and only 65 Joule shocks in the IDE Study. * Acute Test Arrhythmias included all VT and VF episodes for the PAS Study and only VF episodes for the IDE Study.

Time frame: 60 months (1825 days)

Population: The secondary effectiveness endpoint includes subjects in S-ICD PAS combined with the subjects from the S-ICD IDE (NCT# 01064076). S-ICD PAS had 1637 de novo implants and 123 prior IDE implant subjects, for endpoint analyses this was combined with the data from the 191 IDE implanted subjects that did not participate in S-ICD PAS, totaling 1951 subjects. This endpoint analyzes all induced (acute) or spontaneous appropriately treated discrete VT/VF shocks.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
S-ICD System Implant AttemptFirst Shock Effectiveness in Converting Induced (Acute) and Spontaneous Discrete Episodes of VT/VF2071 S-ICD Shocks
Comparison: Ho: The 1st Shock Effectiveness in Converting Induced (Acute) \& Spontaneous Discrete VT/VF Episodes to 60 months (p1) does not exceed the performance goal of 84.0%.~Ho: p1 ≤ 84.0% Ha: The 1st Shock Effectiveness in Converting Induced (Acute) \& Spontaneous Discrete VT/VF Episodes to 60 months (p1) does exceed the performance goal of 84.0%.~Ha: p1 \>84.0% The null hypothesis will be rejected if lower one-sided 95% exact confidence bound of the estimate exceeds the performance goal of 84.0%.
Secondary

Number of Participants Free From Electrode-related Complications

The electrode related complications analyzed for this end-point include: complications occurring less than or equal to 30 days post implant that are attributable to structural electrode failure for electrode movement, electrode impendence out of range, electrode conductor fracture, deformation or breakage or insulation failure; OR occurring greater than 30 days post implant regardless of structural failure for electrode movement, electrode impendence out of range, electrode conductor fracture, deformation/breakage or insulation failure; OR occurring greater than 30 days post implant attributable to structural electrode failure for incomplete/improper header connection, in-subject damage to electrode, electrode revision to optimize therapy, electrode movement, infection, oversensing/undersensing. Additionally, a complication is an adverse event that results in permanent loss of device function, invasive intervention or death.

Time frame: 60 months (1800 days)

Population: Secondary safety endpoint includes subjects in S-ICD PAS combined with the subjects from the S-ICD IDE (NCT# 01064076). S-ICD PAS had 1643 de novo implant attempts and 123 prior IDE implant subjects, for endpoint analyses this was combined with the data from the 198 IDE implant attempt subjects that did not participate in S-ICD PAS, totaling 1964 subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
S-ICD System Implant AttemptNumber of Participants Free From Electrode-related Complications1953 Participants
Comparison: Ho: The Electrode-Related Complication Free Rate at 60 months (p1) does not exceed the performance goal of 92.5%.~Ho: p1 ≤ 92.5% Ha: The Electrode-Related Complication Free Rate at 60 months (p1) does exceed the performance goal of 92.5%.~Ha: p1 \> 92.5% The null hypothesis will be rejected if the lower one-sided 95% confidence bound of the proportional means model estimate, using the Peto method for standard error, exceeds the performance goal of 92.5%.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026