Skip to content

A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Evaluation of MediENT® Middle Turbinate Implant Versus MeroPack®, a Bioresorbable Nasal Dressing / Sinus Stent After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Evaluation of MediENT® Middle Turbinate Implant Versus MeroPack®, a Bioresorbable Nasal Dressing / Sinus Stent After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01733667
Acronym
MISTY
Enrollment
60
Registered
2012-11-27
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2013-02-28
Last updated
2013-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Synechia

Keywords

synechia, Fess, sinus surgery

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of MediENT to MeroPack after FESS.

Detailed description

MediENT is designed to minimize lateralization of the middle turbinate, which can cause scarring and obstruction of key sinus openings after endoscopic sinus surgery.

Interventions

DEVICEMediENT

MediENT will be assigned to either the right or left side and positioned between the turbinate and nasal wall of the side assigned. MeroPack will be place in between the turbinate and nasal wall of the side not assigned to MediENT

DEVICEMeroPack

MediENT will be assigned to either the right or left side and positioned between the turbinate and nasal wall of the side assigned. MeroPack will be place in between the turbinate and nasal wall of the side not assigned to MediENT

Sponsors

ENTrigue Surgical, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is between the ages of 18 and 65 years 2. Subject scheduled to undergo bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery 3. Subject signs IRB-approved informed consent form 4. Subject agrees to comply with all study-related procedures

Exclusion criteria

1. History of removal of one or both middle turbinates 2. Significant sinonasal polyps 3. Presence of marked septal asymmetry 4. Presence of significant concha bullosa, which requires surgical excision 5. Presence of non-viable tissue at the implantation site 6. Has an autoimmune disease, e.g., lupus, Graves' disease, myasthenia gravis, Wegener's granulomatosis 7. Known or suspected allergy to device components 8. Participating in another clinical trial which could affect the healing of the middle turbinate 9. Uncontrolled diabetes 10. Known or suspected use of illicit drugs 11. Known or suspected alcoholism 12. Other medical illness that could prevent follow-up or increase the risk of surgery 13. Pregnant or unwilling to take pregnancy prevention measures 14. Subject is currently using CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) for sleep apnea

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Miller synechia score at 8 weeks8 weeks post endoscopic sinus surgeryMiller synechia score at 8 weeks (Number and degree of synechia present between middle turbinate and lateral nasal wall at 8 weeks judged by an independent evaluator)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Miller Score at 4 & 8 weeks4 & 8 weeks post endoscopic sinus surgery* Miller synechia score at 4 weeks (Number and degree of synechia present between middle turbinate and lateral nasal wall at 4 weeks judged by an independent evaluator) * Total mean Miller score at 8 weeks

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026