Skip to content

A Study of Intravenous MK-8226 in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis (MK-8226-003)

A Phase Ib Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Multiple Rising Dose Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Immunogenicity of Intravenous MK-8226 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01732510
Enrollment
65
Registered
2012-11-22
Start date
2012-12-21
Completion date
2014-10-20
Last updated
2019-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis

Brief summary

This is a 3-part study to assess the safety, tolerability, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity of MK-8226 in participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Part 1 (multiple rising dose study) objectives were to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MK-8226 and to assess safety and PK. Part 2 objectives were to determine safety, PK, and preliminary efficacy. Part 3 objectives were to further define safety and PK, and explore MK-8226 PK/PD to model the optimal dose range for future studies. The study was terminated early due to business reasons on 08 May 2014; final results from an analysis for Part 1 (efficacy, PK, safety, immunogenicity) and Part 2 (safety, immunogenicity) are summarized.

Detailed description

Part 1 of the study is a multiple rising dose assessment of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of MK-8226 for a period of 12 weeks followed by a 20-week off-treatment follow-up period. Part 2 of the study is an assessment of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of MK-8226 for 12 weeks followed by a 20-week off-treatment follow-up period. In Part 3 of the study, participants will be treated with MK-8226 for a period of 12 weeks followed by a 20-week off-treatment follow-up period to evaluate pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic correlations to assist with modeling the dose range planned for further studies.

Interventions

DRUGMK-8226

MK-8226 administered IV at a weight-based dose every 2 weeks for 12 weeks.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo administered IV every 2 weeks for a period of 12 weeks.

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Body weight \>=40 kg * Clinical diagnosis of atopic dermatitis for at least 6 months prior * Candidate for systemic or phototherapy (i.e., failed topical treatment) * Moderate-to-severe disease as defined by Body Surface Area (BSA) ≥10%, EASI ≥12, and IGA ≥3 * No clinically significant abnormality on electrocardiogram * No history of active or latent tuberculosis (TB) and no signs or symptoms suggestive of TB * No history of active or latent TB and no signs or symptoms suggestive of TB * History of inadequate response to a stable (≥ 1 month) regimen of topical corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors within 3 months before the screening visit

Exclusion criteria

* Concurrent significant skin disease * Any significant organ dysfunction within 6 months prior * History of clinically significant heart disease * History of neoplastic disease * Positive for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) * Infection requiring oral antibiotics within 2 weeks prior * Receipt of a live virus vaccine within 4 weeks prior * Inability to refrain from topical or systemic therapy during course of the study * Had major surgery or donated or lost \>=1 unit of blood within 4 weeks prior * Participation in another study within 4 weeks prior * Current or regular user of illicit drugs or a history of drug or alcohol abuse within 1 year prior * Pregnant, breast-feeding, or anticipated to conceive during the course of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) for Study Part 1Baseline, Week 12Reduction from baseline in EASI at Week 12 (interim analysis data). The EASI assesses intensity of four lesion characteristics (erythema, infiltration/population, excoriation, lichenification) each rated on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) across four regions (head, trunk, upper and lower extremities). Affected areas in each region are assessed as percentage of body surface (head \[10%\], trunk \[30%\], upper extremities \[20%\], and lower extremities \[40%\]). The total score is a sum of each region score and can range from 0 (absent disease) to 72 (severe disease).
Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse EventUp to 32 WeeksAn adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse EventUp to 12 WeeksAn AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of MK-8226 From Time 0 to Tau (AUC0-tau) Following Multiple Intravenous Dose AdministrationDays 1, 3, 5, 9, 14, 70, 72, 74, 84AUC(0-tau) defined as AUC from time zero to tau where tau is the dosing interval (312 hours) was determined for the first and last periods of MK-8226 dosing. MK-8226 was administered on Days 1, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70. Blood concentrations of MK-8226 were determined on Days 1 (incl. predose), 3, 5, 9, 14 (incl. predose), 70 (incl. predose), 72, 74, 84. The placebo group is not included; this endpoint evaluated only the MK-8226 groups. No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis.
AUC From Time 0 to Last Measurement (AUC0-last) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Intravenous Dose AdministrationDays 70, 72, 74, 84, 98, 112, 140, 168, 196, 224AUC0-last defined as AUC up to the last measured concentration was determined for the last period of dosing (starting Week 10 \[Day 70\]) up to the last measurement. MK-8226 was administered on Days 1, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70. Blood concentrations of MK-8226 were determined on Days 70 (incl. predose), 72, 74, 84, 98, 112, 140, 168, 196, and 224. The placebo group is not included; this endpoint evaluated only the MK-8226 groups. No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis.
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous AdministrationDays 1, 3, 5, 9, 14, 70, 72, 74, 84Cmax was determined for the first and last periods of MK-8226 dosing. MK-8226 was administered on Days 1, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70. Blood concentrations of MK-8226 were determined on Days 1 (incl. predose), 3, 5, 9, 14 (incl. predose), 70 (incl. predose), 72, 74, and 84. The placebo group is not included; this endpoint evaluated only the MK-8226 groups. No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis.
Clearance (CL) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous AdministrationDays 1, 3, 5, 9, 14, 28, 42, 56, 70, 72, 74, 84CL, the volume of plasma cleared of drug per unit time, was determined for the last period of dosing (starting Week 10 \[Day 70\]) in the treatment period. MK-8226 was administered on Days 1, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70. Blood concentrations of MK-8226 were determined on Days 1 (incl. predose), 3, 5, 9, 14 (incl. predose), 28 (incl. predose), 42 (incl. predose), 56 (incl. predose), 70 (incl. predose), 72, 74, and 84. The placebo group is not included; this endpoint evaluated only the MK-8226 groups. No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis.
Volume of Distribution (Vd) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Intravenous AdministrationDays 70, 72, 74, 84, 98, 112, 140, 168, 196, 224Vd, a theoretical approximation of degree to which the drug distributes in body tissue rather than plasma (higher Vd indicates greater tissue distribution), was determined for the last period of dosing (starting Week 10 \[Day 70\]) in the treatment period. MK-8226 was administered on Days 1, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70. Blood concentrations of MK-8226 were determined on Days 70 (incl. predose), 72, 74, 84, 98, 112, 140, 168, 196, and 224. The placebo group is not included; this endpoint evaluated only the MK-8226 groups. No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis.
Terminal Half Life (t1/2) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous AdministrationDays 70, 72, 74, 84, 98, 112, 140, 168, 196, 224t1/2, the time needed for the concentration of drug to reach half the initial concentration, was determined for the last period of dosing (starting Week 10 \[Day 70\]) up to the last measurement. MK-8226 was administered on Days 1, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70. Blood concentrations of MK-8226 were determined on Days 70 (incl. predose), 72, 74, 84, 98, 112, 140, 168, 196, and 224. The placebo group is not included; this endpoint evaluated only the MK-8226 groups. No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis.
Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) for Study Part 2Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 24The EASI assesses intensity of four lesion characteristics (erythema, infiltration/population, excoriation, lichenification) each rated on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) across four regions (head, trunk, upper and lower extremities). Affected areas in each region are assessed as percentage of body surface (head \[10%\], trunk \[30%\], upper extremities \[20%\], and lower extremities \[40%\]). The total score is a sum of each region score and can range from 0 (absent disease) to 72 (severe disease).
Change From Baseline in the Scoring Atopic Dermatitis Scale (SCORAD) in Study Part 2Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24The SCORAD index scale combines 1) intensity of six lesion characteristics (erythema, edema/papulation, oozing/crusts, excoriations, lichenification, dryness) as assessed by the physician on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) across four regions (head, trunk, upper and lower extremities) along with 2) subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep disturbance as reported by the patient on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 1 to 10 cm (increasing severity). Physician assessment of affected areas in each region is made as percentage of body surface (head \[10%\], trunk \[30%\], upper extremities \[20%\], and lower extremities \[40%\]). The final SCORAD index score, ranging from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease), is calculated according to the weighted formula: (0.2 x area) + (3.5 x \[sum of intensity score for each of the 6 items\]) + participant's subjective score.
Change From Baseline in Participant Pruritus in Study Part 2Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24Skin pruritus (itching) is a typical characteristic of atopic dermatitis. Participant subjective assessment of pruritus (component of SCORAD) is rated on a VAS ranging from 1 to 10 cm (increasing severity).
Change From Baseline in Participant Sleep Disturbance in Study Part 2Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24Sleep disturbance (sleep loss, disruption, or interference) due to unremitting pruritus and other causes is a quality of life issue in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Participant subjective assessment of sleep disturbance (component of SCORAD) over the past 3 days is rated on a VAS ranging from 1 to 10 cm (increasing severity).
Number of Participants Requiring As-Needed Oral Antihistamines as Rescue Medication in Study Part 2Up to Week 12Oral antihistamines (i.e., diphenhydramine, acrivastine fenistil) were provided as as-needed rescue medication for severe pruritus.
Percentage of Participants With >=50% Improvement in EASI ScoreBaseline, Week 12, Week 24The EASI assesses intensity of four lesion characteristics (erythema, infiltration/population, excoriation, lichenification) each rated on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) across four regions (head, trunk, upper and lower extremities). Affected areas in each region are assessed as percentage of body surface (head \[10%\], trunk \[30%\], upper extremities \[20%\], and lower extremities \[40%\]). The total score is a sum of each region score and can range from 0 (absent disease) to 72 (severe disease).
Number of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationDays 1 (predose) and Days 14, 28, 42, 56, 74, 112, and 224Testing for ADA positivity and neutralizing response and antibody titre quantification are performed with blood (serum) samples collected at baseline (Day 1 predose) and Days 14, 28, 42, 56, 74, 112, and 224. Neutralizing response refers to ADA neutralizing interference with study drug assessed in vitro. Non-Treatment emergent ADA refers to presence of ADAs (as determined by assay) in the absence of treatment with study drug (i.e., at predose).
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Clear or Almost Clear in Study Part 2Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24Percentage of participants achieving an IGA of atopic dermatitis of clear-0 or almost clear-1. The IGA is a six-point scale measuring the severity of disease at time of physical examination of the participant by the physician. The IGA is scored 0 (Clear) to 5 (Very severe disease).
Plasma Chemokine (C-C Motif) Ligand 17 (CCL17) Level in Study Part 2Baseline, 48 Hours, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 16CCL17 is a pro-allergic chemokine that is assessed in human plasma. Levels of CCL17 are increased in allergic disease states.
Plasma Chemokine (C-C Motif) Ligand 22 (CCL22) Level in Study Part 2Baseline, 48 Hours, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 16CCL22 is a pro-allergic chemokine that is assessed in human plasma. Levels of CCL22 are increased in allergic disease states.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Participant's Global Impression of Disease Status in Study Part 2Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24Participant subjective impression of improvement of his/her disease condition is scored on a six-point scale: 0 (Clear) to 5 (Very severe disease).

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants were screened for study eligibility over 4 weeks prior to first dosing. Additional inclusion and exclusion criteria applied.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kg
MK-8226 administered intravenously (IV) at a weight-based dose every 2 weeks for a period of 12 weeks.
9
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kg
MK-8226 administered IV at a weight-based dose every 2 weeks for a period of 12 weeks.
9
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kg
MK-8226 administered IV at a weight-based dose every 2 weeks for a period of 12 weeks.
8
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kg
MK-8226 administered IV at a weight-based dose every 2 weeks for a period of 12 weeks.
10
Part 1: Placebo (Pooled)
Dose-matched placebo administered IV every 2 weeks for a period of 12 weeks.
8
Part 2: MK-8226 3 mg/kg
MK-8226 administered IV at a weight-based dose every 2 weeks for a period of 12 weeks.
13
Part 2: Placebo
Placebo administered IV every 2 weeks for a period of 12 weeks.
8
Total65

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006
Overall StudyAdverse Event0110001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0011010
Overall StudyPhysician Decision0100000
Overall StudyPregnancy0001000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0001000
Overall StudyStudy Terminated By Sponsor00010126
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1321501

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgPart 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgPart 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgPart 1: Placebo (Pooled)Part 2: MK-8226 3 mg/kgPart 2: PlaceboPart 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants8 Participants10 Participants8 Participants13 Participants8 Participants8 Participants64 Participants
Age, Continuous30.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
41.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
34.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
37.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
38.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
33.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
49.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
38.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants4 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants4 Participants4 Participants3 Participants5 Participants5 Participants5 Participants33 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 96 / 96 / 87 / 107 / 810 / 137 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 90 / 90 / 81 / 100 / 80 / 131 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) for Study Part 1

Reduction from baseline in EASI at Week 12 (interim analysis data). The EASI assesses intensity of four lesion characteristics (erythema, infiltration/population, excoriation, lichenification) each rated on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) across four regions (head, trunk, upper and lower extremities). Affected areas in each region are assessed as percentage of body surface (head \[10%\], trunk \[30%\], upper extremities \[20%\], and lower extremities \[40%\]). The total score is a sum of each region score and can range from 0 (absent disease) to 72 (severe disease).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) defined as all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment with baseline and at least one post-dose assessment (EASI) was used for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) for Study Part 1-5.77 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.17
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) for Study Part 1-8.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.39
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) for Study Part 1-10.20 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.23
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgChange From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) for Study Part 1-7.78 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.35
Part 1: Placebo (Pooled)Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) for Study Part 1-0.38 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.37
Comparison: The reduction from baseline in EASI at week 12 for participants receiving MK-8226 3 mg/kg was compared to placebo (MK-8226 3 mg - Placebo). The constrained longitudinal data analysis model used variance component covariance matrix to model correlation among repeated visits, without adjustment for interaction of treatment group by visit.p-value: 0.01595% CI: [-16.87, -2.77]Constrained longitudinal data analysis
Primary

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE.

Time frame: Up to 12 Weeks

Population: The ASaT population defined as all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug was used for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event0 participants
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event1 participants
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event1 participants
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event0 participants
Part 1: Placebo (Pooled)Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event0 participants
Part 2: MK-8226 3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event0 participants
Part 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event1 participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE.

Time frame: Up to 32 Weeks

Population: The All Subjects as Treated (ASaT) population defined as all participants who received at least one dose of investigational drug was used for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event8 participants
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event6 participants
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event6 participants
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event7 participants
Part 1: Placebo (Pooled)Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event7 participants
Part 2: MK-8226 3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event10 participants
Part 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event7 participants
Secondary

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve of MK-8226 From Time 0 to Tau (AUC0-tau) Following Multiple Intravenous Dose Administration

AUC(0-tau) defined as AUC from time zero to tau where tau is the dosing interval (312 hours) was determined for the first and last periods of MK-8226 dosing. MK-8226 was administered on Days 1, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70. Blood concentrations of MK-8226 were determined on Days 1 (incl. predose), 3, 5, 9, 14 (incl. predose), 70 (incl. predose), 72, 74, 84. The placebo group is not included; this endpoint evaluated only the MK-8226 groups. No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis.

Time frame: Days 1, 3, 5, 9, 14, 70, 72, 74, 84

Population: The Per-Protocol (PP) population defined as all participants compliant with study procedure with data available (AUC0-tau) from at least one treatment was used for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgArea Under the Concentration-time Curve of MK-8226 From Time 0 to Tau (AUC0-tau) Following Multiple Intravenous Dose AdministrationWeek 1 (n=9,7,8,10)1000 μg*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.2
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgArea Under the Concentration-time Curve of MK-8226 From Time 0 to Tau (AUC0-tau) Following Multiple Intravenous Dose AdministrationWeek 10 (n=8,5,6,6)2310 μg*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 11
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgArea Under the Concentration-time Curve of MK-8226 From Time 0 to Tau (AUC0-tau) Following Multiple Intravenous Dose AdministrationWeek 10 (n=8,5,6,6)8530 μg*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.4
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgArea Under the Concentration-time Curve of MK-8226 From Time 0 to Tau (AUC0-tau) Following Multiple Intravenous Dose AdministrationWeek 1 (n=9,7,8,10)3300 μg*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.3
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgArea Under the Concentration-time Curve of MK-8226 From Time 0 to Tau (AUC0-tau) Following Multiple Intravenous Dose AdministrationWeek 1 (n=9,7,8,10)9300 μg*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.1
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgArea Under the Concentration-time Curve of MK-8226 From Time 0 to Tau (AUC0-tau) Following Multiple Intravenous Dose AdministrationWeek 10 (n=8,5,6,6)21100 μg*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.8
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgArea Under the Concentration-time Curve of MK-8226 From Time 0 to Tau (AUC0-tau) Following Multiple Intravenous Dose AdministrationWeek 1 (n=9,7,8,10)31400 μg*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 11.2
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgArea Under the Concentration-time Curve of MK-8226 From Time 0 to Tau (AUC0-tau) Following Multiple Intravenous Dose AdministrationWeek 10 (n=8,5,6,6)82100 μg*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.2
Secondary

AUC From Time 0 to Last Measurement (AUC0-last) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Intravenous Dose Administration

AUC0-last defined as AUC up to the last measured concentration was determined for the last period of dosing (starting Week 10 \[Day 70\]) up to the last measurement. MK-8226 was administered on Days 1, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70. Blood concentrations of MK-8226 were determined on Days 70 (incl. predose), 72, 74, 84, 98, 112, 140, 168, 196, and 224. The placebo group is not included; this endpoint evaluated only the MK-8226 groups. No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis.

Time frame: Days 70, 72, 74, 84, 98, 112, 140, 168, 196, 224

Population: The PP population defined as all participants compliant with study procedure with data available (AUC0-last) from at least one treatment was used for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgAUC From Time 0 to Last Measurement (AUC0-last) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Intravenous Dose Administration6460 μg*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.3
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgAUC From Time 0 to Last Measurement (AUC0-last) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Intravenous Dose Administration22600 μg*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 65.8
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgAUC From Time 0 to Last Measurement (AUC0-last) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Intravenous Dose Administration47100 μg*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 97.2
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgAUC From Time 0 to Last Measurement (AUC0-last) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Intravenous Dose Administration264000 μg*hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 25.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Participant Pruritus in Study Part 2

Skin pruritus (itching) is a typical characteristic of atopic dermatitis. Participant subjective assessment of pruritus (component of SCORAD) is rated on a VAS ranging from 1 to 10 cm (increasing severity).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24

Population: No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis. The study was early terminated from a business perspective.

Secondary

Change From Baseline in Participant Sleep Disturbance in Study Part 2

Sleep disturbance (sleep loss, disruption, or interference) due to unremitting pruritus and other causes is a quality of life issue in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Participant subjective assessment of sleep disturbance (component of SCORAD) over the past 3 days is rated on a VAS ranging from 1 to 10 cm (increasing severity).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24

Population: No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis. The study was early terminated from a business perspective.

Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) for Study Part 2

The EASI assesses intensity of four lesion characteristics (erythema, infiltration/population, excoriation, lichenification) each rated on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) across four regions (head, trunk, upper and lower extremities). Affected areas in each region are assessed as percentage of body surface (head \[10%\], trunk \[30%\], upper extremities \[20%\], and lower extremities \[40%\]). The total score is a sum of each region score and can range from 0 (absent disease) to 72 (severe disease).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 24

Population: No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis. The study was early terminated from a business perspective.

Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Scoring Atopic Dermatitis Scale (SCORAD) in Study Part 2

The SCORAD index scale combines 1) intensity of six lesion characteristics (erythema, edema/papulation, oozing/crusts, excoriations, lichenification, dryness) as assessed by the physician on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) across four regions (head, trunk, upper and lower extremities) along with 2) subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep disturbance as reported by the patient on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 1 to 10 cm (increasing severity). Physician assessment of affected areas in each region is made as percentage of body surface (head \[10%\], trunk \[30%\], upper extremities \[20%\], and lower extremities \[40%\]). The final SCORAD index score, ranging from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease), is calculated according to the weighted formula: (0.2 x area) + (3.5 x \[sum of intensity score for each of the 6 items\]) + participant's subjective score.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24

Population: No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis. The study was early terminated from a business perspective.

Secondary

Clearance (CL) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous Administration

CL, the volume of plasma cleared of drug per unit time, was determined for the last period of dosing (starting Week 10 \[Day 70\]) in the treatment period. MK-8226 was administered on Days 1, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70. Blood concentrations of MK-8226 were determined on Days 1 (incl. predose), 3, 5, 9, 14 (incl. predose), 28 (incl. predose), 42 (incl. predose), 56 (incl. predose), 70 (incl. predose), 72, 74, and 84. The placebo group is not included; this endpoint evaluated only the MK-8226 groups. No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis.

Time frame: Days 1, 3, 5, 9, 14, 28, 42, 56, 70, 72, 74, 84

Population: The PP population defined as all participants compliant with study procedure with data available (CL) from at least one treatment was used for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgClearance (CL) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous Administration3.04 mL/day/kgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 11
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgClearance (CL) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous Administration2.81 mL/day/kgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.4
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgClearance (CL) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous Administration3.33 mL/day/kgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.8
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgClearance (CL) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous Administration2.9 mL/day/kgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.2
Secondary

Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous Administration

Cmax was determined for the first and last periods of MK-8226 dosing. MK-8226 was administered on Days 1, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70. Blood concentrations of MK-8226 were determined on Days 1 (incl. predose), 3, 5, 9, 14 (incl. predose), 70 (incl. predose), 72, 74, and 84. The placebo group is not included; this endpoint evaluated only the MK-8226 groups. No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis.

Time frame: Days 1, 3, 5, 9, 14, 70, 72, 74, 84

Population: The PP population defined as all participants compliant with study procedure with data available (Cmax) from at least one treatment was used for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous AdministrationWeek 10 (n=8,6,6,6)11.7 μg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 9.63
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous AdministrationWeek 1 (n=9,8,8,10)7.12 μg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.9
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous AdministrationWeek 1 (n=9,8,8,10)21.6 μg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 26
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous AdministrationWeek 10 (n=8,6,6,6)42.4 μg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.1
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous AdministrationWeek 10 (n=8,6,6,6)106 μg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.6
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous AdministrationWeek 1 (n=9,8,8,10)60.3 μg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous AdministrationWeek 10 (n=8,6,6,6)398 μg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.1
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous AdministrationWeek 1 (n=9,8,8,10)200 μg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 12.1
Secondary

Number of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Formation

Testing for ADA positivity and neutralizing response and antibody titre quantification are performed with blood (serum) samples collected at baseline (Day 1 predose) and Days 14, 28, 42, 56, 74, 112, and 224. Neutralizing response refers to ADA neutralizing interference with study drug assessed in vitro. Non-Treatment emergent ADA refers to presence of ADAs (as determined by assay) in the absence of treatment with study drug (i.e., at predose).

Time frame: Days 1 (predose) and Days 14, 28, 42, 56, 74, 112, and 224

Population: The ADA evaluable population defined as all participants with at least one ADA sample available after treatment with MK-8226 or placebo was used for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Neutralizing response positive0 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationNon Treatment emergent ADA positive0 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationTreatment emergent ADA positive0 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Max titer 1:100 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Max titer 1:500 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationNon Treatment emergent ADA positive1 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Max titer 1:100 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Neutralizing response positive0 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Max titer 1:500 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationTreatment emergent ADA positive0 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationTreatment emergent ADA positive1 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Max titer 1:100 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationNon Treatment emergent ADA positive0 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Neutralizing response positive1 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Max titer 1:501 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationTreatment emergent ADA positive0 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Neutralizing response positive0 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Max titer 1:100 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationNon Treatment emergent ADA positive0 Participants
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Max titer 1:500 Participants
Part 2: MK-8226 3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Neutralizing response positive1 Participants
Part 2: MK-8226 3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Max titer 1:501 Participants
Part 2: MK-8226 3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationTreatment emergent ADA positive2 Participants
Part 2: MK-8226 3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationNon Treatment emergent ADA positive0 Participants
Part 2: MK-8226 3 mg/kgNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Max titer 1:100 Participants
Part 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Neutralizing response positive0 Participants
Part 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Max titer 1:500 Participants
Part 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationNon Treatment emergent ADA positive0 Participants
Part 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationTreatment emergent ADA positive0 Participants
Part 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) FormationADA positive: Max titer 1:100 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Requiring As-Needed Oral Antihistamines as Rescue Medication in Study Part 2

Oral antihistamines (i.e., diphenhydramine, acrivastine fenistil) were provided as as-needed rescue medication for severe pruritus.

Time frame: Up to Week 12

Population: No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis. The study was early terminated from a business perspective.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants With >=50% Improvement in EASI Score

The EASI assesses intensity of four lesion characteristics (erythema, infiltration/population, excoriation, lichenification) each rated on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) across four regions (head, trunk, upper and lower extremities). Affected areas in each region are assessed as percentage of body surface (head \[10%\], trunk \[30%\], upper extremities \[20%\], and lower extremities \[40%\]). The total score is a sum of each region score and can range from 0 (absent disease) to 72 (severe disease).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis. The study was early terminated from a business perspective.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Clear or Almost Clear in Study Part 2

Percentage of participants achieving an IGA of atopic dermatitis of clear-0 or almost clear-1. The IGA is a six-point scale measuring the severity of disease at time of physical examination of the participant by the physician. The IGA is scored 0 (Clear) to 5 (Very severe disease).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24

Population: No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis. The study was early terminated from a business perspective.

Secondary

Plasma Chemokine (C-C Motif) Ligand 17 (CCL17) Level in Study Part 2

CCL17 is a pro-allergic chemokine that is assessed in human plasma. Levels of CCL17 are increased in allergic disease states.

Time frame: Baseline, 48 Hours, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 16

Population: No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from Baseline \[BL\] in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis. The study was early terminated from a business perspective.

Secondary

Plasma Chemokine (C-C Motif) Ligand 22 (CCL22) Level in Study Part 2

CCL22 is a pro-allergic chemokine that is assessed in human plasma. Levels of CCL22 are increased in allergic disease states.

Time frame: Baseline, 48 Hours, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 16

Population: No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis. The study was early terminated from a business perspective.

Secondary

Terminal Half Life (t1/2) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous Administration

t1/2, the time needed for the concentration of drug to reach half the initial concentration, was determined for the last period of dosing (starting Week 10 \[Day 70\]) up to the last measurement. MK-8226 was administered on Days 1, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70. Blood concentrations of MK-8226 were determined on Days 70 (incl. predose), 72, 74, 84, 98, 112, 140, 168, 196, and 224. The placebo group is not included; this endpoint evaluated only the MK-8226 groups. No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis.

Time frame: Days 70, 72, 74, 84, 98, 112, 140, 168, 196, 224

Population: The PP population defined as all participants compliant with study procedure with data available (t1/2) from at least one treatment was used for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgTerminal Half Life (t1/2) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous Administration23.6 daysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.5
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgTerminal Half Life (t1/2) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous Administration30 daysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.9
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgTerminal Half Life (t1/2) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous Administration24.7 daysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 51.3
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgTerminal Half Life (t1/2) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Dose Intravenous Administration28.7 daysGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.7
Secondary

Volume of Distribution (Vd) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Intravenous Administration

Vd, a theoretical approximation of degree to which the drug distributes in body tissue rather than plasma (higher Vd indicates greater tissue distribution), was determined for the last period of dosing (starting Week 10 \[Day 70\]) in the treatment period. MK-8226 was administered on Days 1, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70. Blood concentrations of MK-8226 were determined on Days 70 (incl. predose), 72, 74, 84, 98, 112, 140, 168, 196, and 224. The placebo group is not included; this endpoint evaluated only the MK-8226 groups. No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis.

Time frame: Days 70, 72, 74, 84, 98, 112, 140, 168, 196, 224

Population: The PP population defined as all participants compliant with study procedure with data available (Vd) from at least one treatment was used for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: MK-8226 0.3 mg/kgVolume of Distribution (Vd) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Intravenous Administration103 mL/kgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.6
Part 1: MK-8226 1 mg/kgVolume of Distribution (Vd) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Intravenous Administration122 mL/kgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 26.8
Part 1: MK-8226 3 mg/kgVolume of Distribution (Vd) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Intravenous Administration102 mL/kgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 62.1
Part 1: MK-8226 10 mg/kgVolume of Distribution (Vd) of MK-8226 Following Multiple Intravenous Administration120 mL/kgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 25.3
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in the Participant's Global Impression of Disease Status in Study Part 2

Participant subjective impression of improvement of his/her disease condition is scored on a six-point scale: 0 (Clear) to 5 (Very severe disease).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24

Population: No analysis was performed for Part 2 non-safety secondary endpoints after the Part 1 primary endpoint (Change from BL in EASI) did not demonstrate adequate effect in an interim futility analysis. The study was early terminated from a business perspective.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026