Skip to content

Multi-Reader Multi-Case Study to Identify Uterine Contractions Recorded From Laboring and Nonlaboring Patients by Practicing Clinicians

Multi-Reader Multi-Case Study to Identify Uterine Contractions Recorded From Laboring and Nonlaboring Patients by Practicing Clinicians

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01730963
Enrollment
30
Registered
2012-11-21
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2012-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy

Brief summary

This multi-reader multi-case study was designed to evaluate the performance of SureCALL® Labor Monitor® (SureCALL®) directly to the standard Tocodynamometer device (TOCO).

Detailed description

The SureCALL® Labor Monitor® (SureCALL®) is a transabdominal electromyography monitor intended to measure uterine activity. It is intended for use on pregnant women, with singleton pregnancies, using surface electrodes on the maternal abdomen. The device is intended for use by healthcare professionals in a clinical setting. This multi-reader multi-case study was designed to evaluate the performance of SureCALL® to the predicate Tocodynamometer device (TOCO). This study involved 25 women at a Gestational Age of 36 weeks or less and 5 women at a Gestation Age of greater than 36 and not in labor at five clinical sites. Each study subject was instrumented with two technologies for measuring uterine activity: 1. Standard tocodynamometer attached to the maternal abdomen, 2. SureCALL® with a set of abdominal surface electrodes for uterine electromyography attached to the maternal abdomen An assessment was obtained and quantified from masked, qualified clinical obstetrician readers for the evaluation of the equivalence of both labor monitor devices by identifying in isolation the individual uterine contraction signals and the peak of each contraction signal as recorded by each labor monitor device.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Reproductive Research Technologies, LP
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Singleton Pregnancy * Informed Consent Required

Exclusion criteria

* Multifetal Pregnancy * Informed Consent Not Given

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of SureCALL® and Tocodynamometer Detection of Contraction Events, as Identified by Readers9 - 41 MinutesAgreement will be assessed by coefficient of individual agreement (CIA) derived from a dataset of all Reader-marked contractions. In addition, sensitivity and false positive rate per hours will be estimated for each patient by each reader. If CIA ≥ 0.445 (Barnhart, 2007, section 3) or CIA\>0.8, Pan 2010), the SureCALL® is not significantly different than the TOCO.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026