Skip to content

Vestibular Rehabilitation and Dizziness

Vestibular Rehabilitation and Dizziness in Geriatric Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01729039
Acronym
DZO
Enrollment
49
Registered
2012-11-20
Start date
2012-11-01
Completion date
2017-02-28
Last updated
2018-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dizziness

Keywords

rehabilitation, aged, aged, 80 and over, vestibular diseases

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether vestibular exercises provide added benefit to balance rehabilitation in older adults with dizziness and normal vestibular function.

Detailed description

Dizziness is among the most prevalent complaints for which people seek medical help and the incidence increases with advancing age. Dizziness represents a diagnostic and treatment challenge because it is a subjective sensation, refers to a variety of symptoms (unsteadiness, spinning, sense of motion or lightheadedness), and has many potential contributory factors. Dizziness is often related to vestibular disease which is treated effectively with vestibular exercises. Successful management of dizziness is critical because dizziness is a major risk factor for falls in older adults. There are parallels between the effects of age-related versus disease-related loss of vestibular function - in complaints of dizziness and increased risk for falls. The investigators' question, then, is whether the same exercises that are beneficial for patients with vestibular pathology are beneficial for older patients with dizziness but normal vestibular function. Older adults with dizziness who have been referred to Audiology for vestibular evaluation will be randomized to receive either standard balance rehabilitation plus placebo eye exercises (CON) or standard balance rehabilitation plus vestibular-specific exercises (GS). Primary outcomes include symptoms, balance-related confidence, dynamic visual acuity, postural stability as measured by sensory organization test, fall risk as measured by dynamic gait index, and gait speed. Assessment will occur at baseline, discharge from physical therapy (PT), 1 and 6 months post-PT.

Interventions

All subjects perform balance and gait exercises in addition to eye exercises and receive a written home exercise program (HEP) of balance and gait exercises to improve postural stability and mobility with progressively challenging tasks. Balance exercises include maintaining stability with vision and somatosensory cues altered, dynamic weight shifts and performing ankle, hip and step strategies. Gait activities include negotiating uneven terrains and obstacles, gait with head turns, varied speed, and unpredictable starts and stops. Walking for endurance is included in the HEP. Each participant receives a customized balance and gait HEP based on identified impairments and is progressed according to ability and level of assistance at home.

BEHAVIORALgaze stability

Vestibular adaptation and substitution exercises will be performed by the experimental group (GS). Adaptation exercises involve head movement while maintaining focus on a target, which may be stationary or moving. Typical progression of adaptation exercises involve increased velocity of head movement, movement of both target and head, target placed in a distracting visual pattern and maintenance of a challenging posture. During active eye-head exercise, a large eye movement to a target is made prior to the head moving to face the target, potentially facilitating use of preprogrammed eye movements.

BEHAVIORALControl

The placebo exercises will consist of saccadic eye movements while the head is stationary and will be performed by the control group. These eye movements will be performed against a plain background in order to eliminate retinal slip and, therefore, eliminate the error signal for vestibular adaptation.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* at least 50 years of age * documented balance or mobility problems * normal vestibular function, including otolith function

Exclusion criteria

* cognitive impairment * progressive medical issues that would impact mobility (e.g., Parkinson's disease, cerebellar atrophy) * dizziness due to orthostatic hypotension or Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale - Head Movement6 weeksThis scale was used to measure perceived level of dizziness after one minute of horizontal head movement at 1 hertz (Hz). This technique uses a 10-cm line with one end being no symptoms (score = 0) and the other representing the worse possible symptoms (score = 10) and is commonly used to assess perception of pain. The subject is asked to place a mark on the 10-cm line at a point which indicates the intensity of his/her perception of symptoms of dizziness and the distance along that line is measured. Scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse perceived dizziness.
Visual Analog Scale - Disequilibrium6 weeksThis scale was used to measure perceived level of unsteadiness while walking. This technique uses a 10-cm line with one end being no symptoms (score = 0) and the other representing the worse possible symptoms (score = 10) and is commonly used to assess perception of pain. The subject is asked to place a mark on the 10-cm line at a point which indicates the intensity of his/her perception of symptoms of unsteadiness and the distance along that line is measured. Scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse perceived unsteadiness.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dynamic Gait Index6 weeksThe dynamic gait index (DGI) assesses an individual's ability to modify balance while walking in the presence of external demands. The 8 items of the DGI include walking while changing speed and turning the head, walking over and around obstacles, and stair climbing. Scoring of the DGI is based on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 with 0 indicating severe impairment and 3 indicating normal ability. A maximum total score of 24 is possible and scores of \< 20 indicate high risk for falling.
10 Meter Walk Test6 weeksThis measure assesses walking speed over a short distance. Subjects were asked to walk at their preferred gait speed for a distance of 30 feet which allowed 5 feet for acceleration and deceleration at the beginning and end of the walk. The time it took to walk 20 feet was recorded using a calibrated stopwatch and gait speed (ft/s) was calculated.
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale6 weeksAs a result of their disequilibrium, subjects report decreased confidence that they can maintain their balance in a variety of situations. The Activities-specific balance confidence scale (ABC) was developed to measure the subject's confidence with their balance across a range of 16 activities of increasing challenge. Items are rated on a rating scale that ranges from 0 - 100% with a score of zero representing no confidence and a score of 100 representing complete confidence. An overall score is calculated by averaging the items with higher scores indicating higher (better) balance confidence.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Gaze Stability (GS)
Gaze Stability group intervention includes standard balance rehabilitation plus vestibular-specific exercises. Standard balance rehabilitation: All subjects perform balance and gait exercises in addition to eye exercises and receive a written home exercise program (HEP) of balance and gait exercises to improve postural stability and mobility. Walking for endurance is included in the HEP. Each participant receives a customized balance and gait HEP based on identified impairments and is progressed according to ability and level of assistance at home. Vestibular-specific exercises: Gaze stability exercises involve head movement while maintaining focus on a target. Progression involves increased velocity of head movement and target placed in a distracting visual pattern and maintenance of a challenging posture. During active eye-head exercise, a large eye movement to a target is made prior to the head moving to face the target.
13
Control (CON)
Control group intervention includes standard balance rehabilitation plus placebo eye exercises. Standard balance rehabilitation: All subjects perform balance and gait exercises in addition to eye exercises and receive a written home exercise program (HEP) of balance and gait exercises to improve postural stability and mobility. Walking for endurance is included in the HEP. Each participant receives a customized balance and gait HEP based on identified impairments and is progressed according to ability and level of assistance at home. Control exercises: Placebo eye exercises consist of saccadic eye movements while the head is stationary. These eye movements are performed against a plain background in order to eliminate retinal slip and, therefore, eliminate the error signal for vestibular adaptation.
14
Total27

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studydisqualified25
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject87

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalControl (CON)Gaze Stability (GS)
10 Meter Walk Test3.00 ft/s
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.57
2.96 ft/s
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.58
3.05 ft/s
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.58
Activities-specific balance confidence scale74.00 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.42
78.03 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.68
69.64 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.12
Age, Continuous71.15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.47
72.36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.07
69.85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
Dynamic Gait Index18.41 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.83
18.36 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.62
18.46 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.15
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants14 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
25 Participants12 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants9 Participants9 Participants
Visual Analog Scale - Disequilibrium2.29 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.95
2.74 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
1.77 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.69
Visual Analog Scale - Head Movement2.33 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.68
2.58 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.74
2.06 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.69

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 230 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 231 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 230 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Visual Analog Scale - Disequilibrium

This scale was used to measure perceived level of unsteadiness while walking. This technique uses a 10-cm line with one end being no symptoms (score = 0) and the other representing the worse possible symptoms (score = 10) and is commonly used to assess perception of pain. The subject is asked to place a mark on the 10-cm line at a point which indicates the intensity of his/her perception of symptoms of unsteadiness and the distance along that line is measured. Scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse perceived unsteadiness.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Repeated Measure (RM) ANOVA

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gaze StabilityVisual Analog Scale - Disequilibrium1.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
ControlVisual Analog Scale - Disequilibrium1.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.37
p-value: 0.17ANOVA
p-value: 0.297ANOVA
Primary

Visual Analog Scale - Head Movement

This scale was used to measure perceived level of dizziness after one minute of horizontal head movement at 1 hertz (Hz). This technique uses a 10-cm line with one end being no symptoms (score = 0) and the other representing the worse possible symptoms (score = 10) and is commonly used to assess perception of pain. The subject is asked to place a mark on the 10-cm line at a point which indicates the intensity of his/her perception of symptoms of dizziness and the distance along that line is measured. Scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse perceived dizziness.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gaze StabilityVisual Analog Scale - Head Movement1.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
ControlVisual Analog Scale - Head Movement1.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
p-value: 0.356ANOVA
p-value: 0.84ANOVA
Secondary

10 Meter Walk Test

This measure assesses walking speed over a short distance. Subjects were asked to walk at their preferred gait speed for a distance of 30 feet which allowed 5 feet for acceleration and deceleration at the beginning and end of the walk. The time it took to walk 20 feet was recorded using a calibrated stopwatch and gait speed (ft/s) was calculated.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gaze Stability10 Meter Walk Test3.15 ft/sStandard Deviation 0.54
Control10 Meter Walk Test3.28 ft/sStandard Deviation 0.69
p-value: 0.009ANOVA
p-value: 0.146ANOVA
Secondary

Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale

As a result of their disequilibrium, subjects report decreased confidence that they can maintain their balance in a variety of situations. The Activities-specific balance confidence scale (ABC) was developed to measure the subject's confidence with their balance across a range of 16 activities of increasing challenge. Items are rated on a rating scale that ranges from 0 - 100% with a score of zero representing no confidence and a score of 100 representing complete confidence. An overall score is calculated by averaging the items with higher scores indicating higher (better) balance confidence.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gaze StabilityActivities-specific Balance Confidence Scale83.98 percentageStandard Deviation 14.4
ControlActivities-specific Balance Confidence Scale83.37 percentageStandard Deviation 6.3
p-value: 0.005ANOVA
p-value: 0.172ANOVA
Secondary

Dynamic Gait Index

The dynamic gait index (DGI) assesses an individual's ability to modify balance while walking in the presence of external demands. The 8 items of the DGI include walking while changing speed and turning the head, walking over and around obstacles, and stair climbing. Scoring of the DGI is based on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 with 0 indicating severe impairment and 3 indicating normal ability. A maximum total score of 24 is possible and scores of \< 20 indicate high risk for falling.

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gaze StabilityDynamic Gait Index21.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
ControlDynamic Gait Index21.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
p-value: <0.001ANOVA
p-value: 0.817ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026