Allergic Rhinitis, Allergy
Conditions
Keywords
Allergy, Birch Pollen, Immunotherapy
Brief summary
Birch pollen allergic patients are currently treated by subcutaneous injections of pollen extracts either by standard allergen specific immunotherapy (SIT) or ultra-rush immunotherapy. Such treatment is prone to side effects and has to be performed in a hospital environment due to the risk of potential anaphylactic reactions. The aim of this study is to test the new product AllerT expected to show widely reduced side effects. AllerT will be injected via two different routes, subcutaneous versus intradermal. The primary endpoint of the study is the local and systemic safety of repeated injections of the product. Since AllerT should provide patients with a pre-seasonal treatment to decrease seasonal allergic symptoms, we will also evaluate the potential efficacy of the approach using a nasal provocation test (NPT) with birch pollen
Detailed description
In addition to the initial protocol, post hoc evaluations were conducted, after new ethics committee reviews, to assess quality of life during the birch pollen season following the trial (April 2009) and to obtain blood samples for evaluation of immunology markers IgG4 and IgE after the season 2010 (July 2010) and after the season 2012 (July 2012),
Interventions
AllerT subcutaneous injections on days 1, 7, 14, 21 and 56 - cumulative dose 440 microgram)
AllerT intra-dermal injections on days 1, 7, 14, 21 and 56 - cumulative dose 440 microgram)
Placebo subcutaneous injections on days 1, 7, 14, 21 and 56
Placebo intra-dermal injections on days 1, 7, 14, 21 and 56
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Allergic rhinitis symptoms during the pollen season preceding the study, confirmed by SPT (prick tests) and/or a positive specific IgE CAP test for birch pollen (class I minimum) * Positive SPT to Bet v 1 (prick tests), negative SPT to AllerT
Exclusion criteria
* received immunotherapy against any allergen within 3 years before the start of the study. * symptomatic to perennial allergens or active seasonal allergy during the trial. * non controlled asthma (peak flow lower than 30% of predicted value). * history of any severe medical condition able to influence the course of the study * Any confirmed or suspected immunodeficiency condition, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and asplenia. * Subjects under immunosuppressive medication. * Pregnant or lactating women or women willing or intending to become pregnant during the study. * Any other significant finding which, in the opinion of the investigator, would increase the risk of having an adverse outcome from participating in this protocol or of dropping out of the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants with adverse events | 84 days | collection of local or systemic allergic reactions and any other adverse events through patient diaries and investigators' interviews during the 8-week treatment period and 4 week post-treatment follow-up (Day 84) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| change from baseline in blood levels of specific IgG4 and IgE | after 7, 14, 21, 56 and 84 days and after 16 to 18 months and 40 to 42 months | blood samples were taken at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 of the treatment period, 4 weeks later and then in July 2010 and in July 2012 |
| change from baseline in nasal provocation tests | 84 days | nasal provocation tests with birch pollen extract are assessed before treatment and at visit on day 84 of the trial, 4 weeks after completion of treatment |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Total score of the Mini-RQLQ Quality-of-life questionnaire | 4 weeks during April 2009 | weekly questionnaires are filled in by the subjects during April 2009 at the time of the birch pollen season in the trial center area |
Countries
Switzerland