Skip to content

Inspiratory Muscle Training and Asthma

Inspiratory Muscle Training as a Novel Approach in the Treatment of Asthma

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01727765
Enrollment
16
Registered
2012-11-16
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2015-05-31
Last updated
2019-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Asthma, inspiratory muscle training

Brief summary

This is a pilot study which will assess the feasibility of a follow on main study. This study will examine the impact of inspiratory muscle training on quality of life, rescue drug medication usage, and other markers of asthma in adult asthmatics in the UK.

Interventions

OTHERinspiratory muscle training

Both groups will undertake six weeks of inspiratory muscle training (POWERbreathe, H&B International Ltd, UK), six days per week, with the only difference being the load set on the inspiratory muscle training device. For the real inspiratory muscle training group this load will be set to around 50% of maximal inspiratory mouth pressure and for the sham inspiratory muscle training group this load will be set to around 5% of maximal inspiratory mouth pressure.

Sponsors

National Health Service, United Kingdom
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Portsmouth
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Asthma Control Questionnaire score of ≥ 1.5 * 10 mg or less of prednisolone (or equivalent) daily * Aged 18 to 59 years inclusive * Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Any significant heart or lung disease other than asthma including any previous history of pneumothorax * Patients with a concomitant condition (including clinically relevant cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological, endocrine, or other major systemic disease) not controlled with treatment, making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study results difficult * Women who are pregnant * Forced expiratory volume in one second of less than 50% best or predicted * A history of smoking 20 cigarettes a day for 20 years or more (or an equivalent amount) * Undertaken a structured program of inspiratory muscle training within the past three months * Currently a participant in another interventional study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximal Inspiratory Mouth Pressure (MIP)pre (after the 4 week run-in) and post 6 weeks of IMTMIP is a surrogate measure of inspiratory muscle strength and was measured pre and post 6 weeks of either experimental or sham inspiratory muscle trianing (IMT).

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental
6 weeks of inspiratory muscle training, 6 days per week. The intensity of training will be equivalent to up to 50% of pre-training maximal inspiratory mouth pressure and will be adapted weekly to reflect the improvement in inspiratory muscle strength inspiratory muscle training: Both groups will undertake six weeks of inspiratory muscle training (POWERbreathe, H&B International Ltd, UK), six days per week, with the only difference being the load set on the inspiratory muscle training device. For the real inspiratory muscle training group this load will be set to around 50% of maximal inspiratory mouth pressure and for the sham inspiratory muscle training group this load will be set to around 5% of maximal inspiratory mouth pressure.
8
Sham Comparator
6 weeks of sham inspiratory muscle training, 6 days per week. The intensity of training will be equivalent to 5% of pre-training inspiratory mouth pressure throughout the 6 week period. inspiratory muscle training: Both groups will undertake six weeks of inspiratory muscle training (POWERbreathe, H&B International Ltd, UK), six days per week, with the only difference being the load set on the inspiratory muscle training device. For the real inspiratory muscle training group this load will be set to around 50% of maximal inspiratory mouth pressure and for the sham inspiratory muscle training group this load will be set to around 5% of maximal inspiratory mouth pressure.
8
Total16

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham ComparatorExperimentalTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Age, Continuous54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
8 participants8 participants16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants2 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 80 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Maximal Inspiratory Mouth Pressure (MIP)

MIP is a surrogate measure of inspiratory muscle strength and was measured pre and post 6 weeks of either experimental or sham inspiratory muscle trianing (IMT).

Time frame: pre (after the 4 week run-in) and post 6 weeks of IMT

Population: As this was a feasibility study, statistical analysis was not required

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExperimentalMaximal Inspiratory Mouth Pressure (MIP)MIP pre training9.36 kPaStandard Deviation 2.63
ExperimentalMaximal Inspiratory Mouth Pressure (MIP)MIP post training10.55 kPaStandard Deviation 2.72
ShamMaximal Inspiratory Mouth Pressure (MIP)MIP pre training9.37 kPaStandard Deviation 2.9
ShamMaximal Inspiratory Mouth Pressure (MIP)MIP post training9.21 kPaStandard Deviation 2.66

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026