Skip to content

Efficacy of Proximal Caries Infiltration

Efficacy of Resin Infiltration of Proximal Caries Lesions in Primary Molars: Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01726179
Enrollment
50
Registered
2012-11-14
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2022-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caries, Dental Health

Keywords

caries infiltration, caries arrest, dental anxiety, dental stress, resin infiltration

Brief summary

The goal of the project is to investigate the clinical efficacy of management of early caries lesions by resin infiltration and to further scrutinize the patient stress experiences.

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to test the clinical efficacy of caries infiltration to arrest proximal caries lesions in primary molars. It was hypothesized that infiltrated lesions (test lesions) will progress significantly less than non infiltrated lesions (control lesions). Additionally, it was hypothesized that dental anxiety and stress related to caries infiltration will be significantly less than dental anxiety related to a conventional restorative procedure. The study will be a controlled clinical trial with a split mouth design and blind evaluation of the outcome (caries progression). Caries progression will be evaluated annually, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment.

Interventions

DEVICEResin infiltration

Proximal caries lesions that are selected for this intervention will be treated with the resin infiltrant Icon according to the manufacturer's instructions. In short, local anesthesia of the gingival papila, application of rubber dam, etching of the lesion surface for 120 s using 15%HCl gel, washing the lesion with water spray for 30 s, drying the lesion with 100% ethanol for 30 s and subsequent air blowing, application of the infiltrant for 180 s using an applicator provided with the kit, removing excess material from the lesion surface by air blowing and flossing, light curing of the infiltrant for 40 s, repeated application for 60 s, light curing for 40 s, polishing, and removal of the rubber dam.

DEVICEControl

Proximal caries lesions do not recieve a placebo treatment, but simply left untreated.

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
CollaboratorOTHER
Rio de Janeiro State Research Supporting Foundation (FAPERJ)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
DMG Dental Material Gesellschaft mbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 9 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* children with one tooth surface with active caries lesions * two primary molars with proximal lesion detected on the x-ray (scores 2 (E2) or 3 (D1) in Mejàre et al. scoring system with less depth * asigned informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* children who do not cooperate during dental appointments * primary molars supposed to exfoliate in less than two years * lesions showing obvious cavitation or clear sings of inactivity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Caries progression rate1 yearRadiographic evaluation of infiltrated and control caries lesions to evaluate caries progression. This is done by pairwise comparison of digital bitewing radiographs by one calibrated, blinded examiner.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stress reaction during treatmentImmediateTo evaluate dental anxiety and stress reactions in relation to the caries infiltration procedure in comparison with a dental examination appointment and conventional resin restoration appointment. A facial image scale with five faces ranging from very happy (1) to very unhappy (5) will be used.
Caries riskBaseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 yearsCaries risk is asses based on caries index (Nyvad criteria), proximal plaque index (0 = no visible plaque; 1 = visible plaque) and gingival bleeding index (0 = no bleeding after flossing; 1 = bleeding after flossing), dietary habits, and exposition to fluorides based on the Cariogram model.
Caries progression rate2 years, 3 yearsRadiographic evaluation of infiltrated and control caries lesions to evaluate caries progression in long term. This is done by pairwise comparison of digital bitewing radiographs by one calibrated, blinded examiner.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026