Skip to content

Examining How Motor Rehabilitation Promotes Brain Reorganization Following Stroke, an MRI Study

Examining Mechanisms of Neuroplasticity Following Motor Rehabilitation in Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01725919
Enrollment
31
Registered
2012-11-14
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2025-07-10
Last updated
2025-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiparesis, Stroke

Keywords

motor, stroke, hemiparesis, rehabilitation, constraint induced movement therapy, CI therapy

Brief summary

Constraint-induced movement therapy (CI therapy) is a highly efficacious treatment for residual motor disability in chronic stroke. Its effectiveness is believed to be due, at least in part, to the therapy's ability to aid the brain in rewiring itself. For example, CI therapy produces increases in the amount of grey matter (the parts of the brain where neuron cell bodies are most closely clustered) in certain areas of the human brain (Gauthier et al., 2008). The cellular and molecular mechanisms that are responsible for this increase in grey matter volume are not known, however. Thus, it is unclear how the therapy helps brains rewire themselves. This study aims to better understand the timecourse and cellular/molecular nature of brain changes during CI therapy. Because there is currently no way to directly measure cellular/molecular changes in the brain noninvasively, this study will infer what is happening on a microstructural level using new MRI techniques (three dimensional pictures of the brain). For example, by charting the timecourse of grey matter changes during CI therapy, and cross-comparing this to what is known about the timecourses of different cellular/molecular processes, the investigators can gain a greater understanding of what cellular processes may be responsible for increases in grey matter. The investigators will gain additional information about which cellular processes are important for rehabilitation-induced improvement by measuring larger-scale changes (e.g., amount of blood flow through different brain areas) that accompany cellular changes. The investigators are hopeful that by better understanding how CI therapy can change the brain, the effectiveness of rehabilitation can be improved upon. For example, insight into the mechanisms of rehabilitation-induced brain change may suggest particular drug targets to increase brain plasticity. This study will help us better understand how the brain repairs itself after injury.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCI therapy

constraint induced movement therapy

Sponsors

Ohio State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males or females 18 years of age and over * Experienced a stroke resulting in mild to moderate hemiparesis (some residual motor function, e.g. able to pick up a washcloth placed flat on a table) at least 6 months prior to enrollment. Suggested active range of motion criteria for this level of impairment include: 45° shoulder abduction and flexion, 20° elbow extension, 20° wrist extension, and 10° extension of thumb and fingers. * Preserved ability to comprehend and participate in basic elements of the therapy

Exclusion criteria

* Concurrent participation in other experimental trials for treatment of motor dysfunction * Having received botulinum toxin injection within the past 3 months * Previous intensive rehabilitation in the chronic phase post-stroke * Serious/uncontrolled medical problems (e.g., dementia, severe pain, end-stage or degenerative diseases) * Kidney disease as evidenced by eGFR\<60 * Anemia * Sickle cell disease * History of kidney transplant * Other evidence/history of renal disease * Pregnancy * Implanted metallic parts of implanted electronic devices, including pacemakers, defibrillators, aneurism clip or implant medication pump that are MRI incompatible * An implanted brain stimulator * Permanent tattoo (e.g., eye liner) containing metallic coloring * Claustrophobia precluding MRI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Brain structureParticipants will be followed for 4-6 weeks. Change in brain structure at mid-treatment (after 1 week of CI therapy), post-treatment (after 2 weeks of therapy), and at 2-week follow-up will be measured.Assessed via dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI, diffusion tensor MRI, MRI-based myelin mapping, T1-weighted MRI

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motor functionParticipants will be followed for 4-6 weeks. Change in motor function at mid-treatment (after 1 week of CI therapy), post-treatment (after 2 weeks of therapy), and at 2-week follow-up will be measured.Assessed via Wolf Motor Function Test, Action Research Arm Test, Motor Activity Log

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026