Skip to content

Copenhagen Study of Obese Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease Undergoing Low Energy Diet or Interval Training

Copenhagen Study of Obese Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease Undergoing Low Energy Diet or Interval Training: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01724567
Acronym
CUT-IT
Enrollment
70
Registered
2012-11-12
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2014-04-30
Last updated
2014-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemic Heart Disease, Obesity

Keywords

Interval Training, Weight Loss, Secondary Prevention, Rehabilitation, Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to make a head-to-head comparison of weight loss and interval training as methods of secondary prevention in overweight patients with ischemic heart disease.

Detailed description

In western countries 80 % of patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) are overweight (BMI \> 25). Weight loss using a low energy diet (LED, 800 - 1000 kcal/day) has been shown to induce a considerable weight loss in obese but otherwise healthy patients and to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes in these subjects. Additionally, a British study using a very low energy diet (VLED, 600 kcal/day) to obtain weight loss, has shown that subject with diagnosed type 2 diabetes had their blood glucose normalized after an 8 week VLED. However, the effect of LED has never been examined in overweight patients with IHD. Several studies have shown that patients with IHD have a beneficial effect of exercise training regarding mortality and reduction in cardiovascular risk factors. A Norwegian group has shown that aerobic interval training results in the biggest increase in maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). A high VO2max is correlated to decreased mortality in patients with IHD. In conclusion, weight loss and exercise are known strategies in preventing progression of IHD and development of type 2 diabetes in these patients, however a head-to-head comparison of the two methods has never been made and it is unknown which intervention is the most effective in improving cardiovascular risk profile. Furthermore, several mechanisms behind the known beneficial effect of these interventions are unknown.

Interventions

OTHERInterval Training

Interval training (IT) on an exercise bike 3 times a week, for the first 12 weeks, followed by 40 weeks of IT 2 times a week on exercise bike. Each training session consists of active intervals with a total duration of 16 minutes (durations intervals between 1 and 4 minutes) at 90% of maximal heart rate. Active intervals are separated by active pauses at 60% of maximal heart rate.

OTHERWeight Loss

Low calorie diet approx. 1000 kcal/day for 8 - 10 weeks to obtain a 10 - 15 % weight loss.

Sponsors

University of Copenhagen
CollaboratorOTHER
Amager Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Bispebjerg Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
CollaboratorOTHER
Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
CollaboratorOTHER
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, Davis
CollaboratorOTHER
Texas A&M University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Aarhus
CollaboratorOTHER
Eva Prescott
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stable Ischemic Heart Disease * BMI 28 - 40 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

* Known Diabetes Mellitus * Repeated Fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7 mmol/L or Hba1c \> 7 % * Severe or moderate valve disease * Main stem stenosis * Severe heart failure, Ejection Fraction \< 35 % * Physical or mental disability which are expected to prevent completion of intervention * Severe Chronic obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (FEV1 \< 50 % of expected) or asthma * Active cancer * Severe kidney (GFR \< 40 ml/hour) or severe liver disease * Severe ischemia or arrhythmias during exercise test * 2\. or 3. degree atrio-ventricular (AV) block, not protected by pacemaker * Organised training more than 2 times a week prior to inclusion * Significant weight loss or weight gain (\> 5 %)3 month prior to inclusion * Not able to comprehend written and oral informed consent * Hormone treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Coronary Flow Reserve following the diet or training intervention and a maintenance period0, 12 and 52 weeksAssessed by a non-invasive echocardiographic Doppler measurement

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Heart Rate Variability and silent ischemia following the diet or training intervention and a maintenance period0, 12 and 52 weeksAssessed by Holter Monitoring for 24 - 48 hours
Change in endothelial function following the diet or training intervention and a maintenance period0, 12 and 52 weeksUsing the Endopat 2000 from Itamar
Change in systolic and diastolic function following the diet or training intervention and a maintenance period0, 12 and 52 weeksAssessed by echocardiography resting and during physiological and medical stress.
Change in body composition following the diet or training intervention and a maintenance period0, 12 and 52 weeksAssessed by anthropometry, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (lean body mass, percentage adipose tissue) and abdominal MRI (liver fat, muscle fat, subcutaneous fat and visceral fat at the level of L3).
Change in myocardial blood flow following the diet or training intervention and a maintenance period0, 12 and 52 weeksAssessed by positron emission tomography of the heart
Change in insulin action, beta cell function and incretin secretion following the diet or training intervention and a maintenance period0, 12 and 52 weeksA Oral Glucose Tolerance Test is performed.
Change in oxidized lipids and lipoprotein particle size following the diet or training intervention and a maintenance period0, 12 and 52 weeks
Change in peak oxygen uptake (VO2max) following the diet or training intervention and a maintenance period0, 12 and 52 weeksAssessed using a bicycle ergometer
Change in blood pressure following the diet or training intervention and a maintenance period0, 12 and 52 weeks
Change in inflammatory markers in urin, blood and adipose tissue following the diet or training intervention and a maintenance period0, 12 and 52 weeks
Change in quality of life following the diet or training intervention and a maintenance period0, 12 and 52 weeks
Change in ceramides, diacylglycerol og endocannabinoid (CB)-1 receptors in adipose tissue following the diet or training intervention and a maintenance period0, 12 and 52 weeks
Change in hormones derived from adipose tissue following the diet or training intervention and a maintenance period0, 12 and 52 weeks

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026