Skip to content

Impact of Dialysis Modality on Hepcidin and Iron Metabolism

A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study to Evaluate the Impact of Peritoneal Dialysis Compared With Hemodialysis on Iron Metabolism and Hepcidin

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01723111
Acronym
HERMES
Enrollment
120
Registered
2012-11-07
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2017-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End-stage Renal Disease

Keywords

hepcidin, ESA, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, iron metabolism, dialysis modality

Brief summary

* Dialysis modality may influence the oxidative stress and proinflammatory cytokines in ESRD patients. * Dialysis modality may affect hepcidin * Dialysis modality may influence iron and ESA requirements.

Detailed description

It has been considered that PD patients tended to be less anemic and require lower ESA dose than HD patients. In addition, it was also known that the level of oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines tended to be lower in PD patients than HD patients. And hepcidin synthesis is markedly increased during inflammation. Altogether, Lower ESA requirement in PD patients may be associated with lower hepcidin level due to lower inflammatory state compared with HD patients.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Roche Pharma AG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Fresenius Medical Care North America
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Kyungpook National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent * Age 18 years or older * Dialysis treatment was expected over 3 months * In HD patients, regular hemodialysis 4 h a session more than two times a week * In PD patients, over 2 exchange with more than 1.5 L solution

Exclusion criteria

* Poorly controlled hypertension, i.e. sitting blood pressure exceeding 180/110 despite medication requiring hospitalization or interruption of ESA treatment * Significant acute or chronic bleeding such as overt gastrointestinal bleeding within the previous 3 months * Active malignant disease (except non-melanoma skin cancer and patients with malignant disease who have been disease-free for at least the 5 previous years are eligible) * Acute infection * Hemolysis * Hemoglobinopathies (e.g. homozygous sickle-cell disease, thalassemia of all types) * Megaloblastic anemia * Platelet count \>500 x 109/L or \<100 x 109/L * Pure red call aplasia * Epileptic seizure during previous 3 months * Women of childbearing potential without effective contraception * Known hypersensitivity to recombinant human erythropoietin, polyethylene glycol * Planned elective surgery during the study period except for cataract surgery or laser photocoagulation * Life expectancy less than 12 month

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ESA (Erythrocyte stimulating agents) dosesix monthsWe will compare ESA dose between PD patients and HD patients

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hepcidin levelsix monthsWe will compare hepcidin level between PD patients and HD patients
hs-CRPsix monthsWe will compare hs-CRP level between PD patients and HD patients
Myeloperoxidasesix monthsWe will compare myeloperoxidase between PD patients and HD patients
IV iron treatment (% of patients)six monthsWe will compare IV iron treatment (% of patients) between PD patients and HD patients
TNF-asix monthsWe will compare TNF-a between PD patients and HD patients
IL-6six monthsWe will compare IL-6 between PD patients and HD patients
Total antioxidant capacitysix monthsWe will compare total antioxidant capacity between PD patients and HD patients
Transfusion ratesix monthsWe will compare transfusion rate ( % of patients) between PD patients and HD patients

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026